Read our Digital & Print Editions
And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is reportedly planning to launch a major Government reset, next year, starting with a King's speech in May.
Few would dispute the need. Under current polling the party is on course for a historic routing at next year's local elections.
So far, Labour's response to the threat posed by Reform has been to harden its language and policy on migration, to frame human rights as impediments to tackling the issue, and to signal "toughness" at almost any cost.
The overwhelming logic behind this strategy has been the idea that Labour needs to chase Reform voters in order to survive.
However, new polling suggests the opposite could be true.
Research carried out by Survation for Compassion in Politics, and shared exclusively with Byline Times, shows that if Keir Starmer leaned into his stated values of compassion, tolerance and care, Labour could achieve a net gain of as many as 3.2 million votes at the next election. That is roughly one sixth of the turnout at the last general election and, on similar turnout next time, could be enough to overturn Reform's projected majority.
An electoral drubbing, in other words, is not inevitable. The votes are there. Labour is simply looking for them in the wrong direction.
EXCLUSIVE
'They've Ruined Christmas': Nigerian Student Blocked By Home Office From Visiting UK Family for Holidays
British academic and his Nigerian wife repeatedly stopped from hosting family members, including at their own wedding, due to visa restrictions brought in by Keir Starmer's Government
Nicola Kelly
The biggest gains from this approach would not be from Reform, but from the progressive voters Labour is currently haemorrhaging. According to the polling, an estimated net 1.5 million voters say they would be more likely to switch from the Greens and 1.1 million from the Liberal Democrats were Starmer to be more clearly guided by compassion.
Labour is sitting on a vast pool of voters who broadly share its historic values but who no longer trust its leadership to stand up for them. That erosion of trust matters. Of respondents who currently expect to vote Labour, 50% say they would be more likely to do so if Starmer showed greater compassion. A further 1.5 million voters say they would consider switching to Labour if Keir Starmer came across as more sincere.
This is not just about rhetoric. It is about congruence.
What the polling exposes is something many Westminster commentators have missed. Despite the noise around Reform, Britain remains a predominantly progressive country. Using Survation's segmentation, developed with 38 Degrees, 54% of the electorate falls into what is described as the progressive majority.
These voters are diverse, but they are not incoherent. They include what are known as "open hearted collectivists", "guarded localists", "pragmatic youth", "rooted traditionalists" and "cosmopolitan optimists". They differ on tone and emphasis, but they share core commitments to fairness, dignity, decency and social responsibility.
Crucially, across the whole of this progressive majority, 44% say they would be more likely to vote Labour if Starmer backed more compassionate policies. Just 11% say they would be less likely.
This directly challenges the fatalism that has taken hold in Westminster, the idea that voters are inexorably moving rightwards, and that the only way to defeat the far right is to mimic its language or legitimise its framing. The evidence tells a different story.
As CEO of Compassion in Politics, I have spent years arguing that compassion is not an add on to politics, but a governing principle grounded in evidence, effectiveness and trust.
This polling makes that case in electoral terms. Failing to heed it does not just damage Labour's electoral prospects but also feeds the forces that would undermine democracy.
Adopting the rhetoric...