This podcast uses government documents to illuminate the workings of the American government, and offer context around the effects of government agencies in your everyday life.
All content for Civil Discourse is the property of Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
This podcast uses government documents to illuminate the workings of the American government, and offer context around the effects of government agencies in your everyday life.
Nia and Aughie discuss the recent arguments before the US Supreme Court in the case Watson v The National Republican Party. This case questions whether states can allow counting of mail-in ballots after Election Day.
Civil Discourse
This podcast uses government documents to illuminate the workings of the American government, and offer context around the effects of government agencies in your everyday life.
