Dear Listeners,
In this episode your hosts discuss the question of shame.
[0:24] Intro
[3:28] Different kind of shame
[05:47] Guilt and shame
[06:34] Shame by interpretation
[13:19] Did patients change?
[14:33] Shame and defense
[22:08] Perversions
[31:18] The analyst's shame
[44:27] Shame and castration
[46:38] Shame and anger directed at the Institute
[48:05] Shame and hiding
[50:11] More intense for analysts?
[54:38] Shame between students
[57:59] Peer group to counter shame
[01:01:33] Ending
You can follow us on BlueSky:
@discussionsonpsya.bsky.social
We stopped updating our profile on Tweeter/X because we do not want to support the owner of this application, and we encourage you to do the same. We'll maintain the FB page, but nothing else, for the same reasons.
Thank you for listening, and if you like the podcast, give us 5 stars and mention us to your friends and colleagues.
All content for Discussions On Psychoanalysis is the property of Grégoire Pierre & Edgard Danielsen and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Dear Listeners,
In this episode your hosts discuss the question of shame.
[0:24] Intro
[3:28] Different kind of shame
[05:47] Guilt and shame
[06:34] Shame by interpretation
[13:19] Did patients change?
[14:33] Shame and defense
[22:08] Perversions
[31:18] The analyst's shame
[44:27] Shame and castration
[46:38] Shame and anger directed at the Institute
[48:05] Shame and hiding
[50:11] More intense for analysts?
[54:38] Shame between students
[57:59] Peer group to counter shame
[01:01:33] Ending
You can follow us on BlueSky:
@discussionsonpsya.bsky.social
We stopped updating our profile on Tweeter/X because we do not want to support the owner of this application, and we encourage you to do the same. We'll maintain the FB page, but nothing else, for the same reasons.
Thank you for listening, and if you like the podcast, give us 5 stars and mention us to your friends and colleagues.
#53 On Choosing a Psychoanalytic Institute & a Supervisor
Discussions On Psychoanalysis
59 minutes 20 seconds
1 year ago
#53 On Choosing a Psychoanalytic Institute & a Supervisor
Dear Listeners,
In this episode, your hosts discuss different ways to choose a psychoanalytic institute and a supervisor.
[0:25] Intro
[3:44] How we chose our institute
[9:08] Institutes & Academia
[13:16] What is the point of a psychoanalytic institute?
[17:31] The infamous 800 level at NPAP
[18:17] Why do we need a place to train?
[24:15] A personal analysis is not enough
[27:22] Why would eclectic be better?
[30:18] The pros of a specialized institute
[36:42] Choosing a supervisor or many
[46:29] Important but hard to know aspects of an institute
[51:00] Limited amount of staff members
[52:08] Ability to integrate the conflicts in the present and the past
[56:51] Ending
Discussions On Psychoanalysis
Dear Listeners,
In this episode your hosts discuss the question of shame.
[0:24] Intro
[3:28] Different kind of shame
[05:47] Guilt and shame
[06:34] Shame by interpretation
[13:19] Did patients change?
[14:33] Shame and defense
[22:08] Perversions
[31:18] The analyst's shame
[44:27] Shame and castration
[46:38] Shame and anger directed at the Institute
[48:05] Shame and hiding
[50:11] More intense for analysts?
[54:38] Shame between students
[57:59] Peer group to counter shame
[01:01:33] Ending
You can follow us on BlueSky:
@discussionsonpsya.bsky.social
We stopped updating our profile on Tweeter/X because we do not want to support the owner of this application, and we encourage you to do the same. We'll maintain the FB page, but nothing else, for the same reasons.
Thank you for listening, and if you like the podcast, give us 5 stars and mention us to your friends and colleagues.
