The United States Department of Justice is moving aggressively against Apple, accusing the tech giant of running a monopoly in the smartphone market—a case that has escalated rapidly in recent days and is sending shockwaves through the broader tech industry. The focus is not on ancient history but rather on a live battle now drawing in top officials, industry rivals, and billions of dollars.

On the government side, the case is spearheaded by Antitrust Division chief Gina Slater, a key player in the Biden administration’s so-called “America First Antitrust” push. Slater and her team formally brought suit against Apple in early spring, joined by attorneys general from sixteen states and the District of Columbia. Their main charge is that Apple—under the leadership of CEO Tim Cook—uses its control over hardware and software ecosystems to illegally block competition from rival apps, cloud gaming services, and third-party digital wallets.

Apple’s counterpunch came this week with a formal legal response that doubled down on its previous stance. The company argues that DOJ’s claims “fundamentally misunderstand” the market and threaten iPhone’s very identity, warning that attempts to force open Apple’s system would erode privacy, security, and the user experience that, in Cook’s words, sets Apple apart.

Legal maneuvering is moving fast on multiple fronts, including a courtroom in California where Apple is now pushing to decertify a nationwide class of more than one hundred eighty-five million consumers hoping to sue for damages. Apple’s legal team is working to shut down these claims before they ever see trial.

But the big news is what’s at stake for Apple’s earning power. Apple currently receives an estimated fifteen billion to twenty billion dollars a year from Google in exchange for setting Google as the default search engine on Apple’s devices. Major banks and analysts, including JPMorgan, are warning that the outcome of this case—alongside the Department of Justice’s related blockbuster suit targeting Google—could strip Apple of this extraordinary revenue stream. Worse still for Apple, there is now the real possibility that remedies could force Google to stop paying Apple or even break up some of Google’s core businesses, including its Chrome browser. The impact would directly threaten up to twelve billion dollars annually in services income, potentially slashing Apple’s earnings per share by nearly ten percent.

The Department of Justice is dead-set on creative remedies. One idea is for regulators to prohibit Google from paying Apple at all for default search placement, a move that would strike at the heart of both companies’ business models. Apple, meanwhile, is preparing for the worst by diversifying partnerships and investing billions of dollars in artificial intelligence platforms, such as those developed by OpenAI and Anthropic, attempting to shore up new revenue opportunities if the Google pipeline dries up.

Industry watchers say this is a tipping point not just for Apple but for the smartphone and software sectors as a whole. If the Department of Justice prevails, it could force Apple to allow wide-open access to its App Store, enable cross-platform messaging and payment services, and create new competitive lanes for cloud gaming and wearable tech.

A ruling with broad implications is expected sometime over the next several months. Whatever the outcome, the case promises to shape how American tech giants do business for years to come and could spill over into the regulatory battles now brewing in artificial intelligence and online commerce across the globe.

One thing is clear: whether you are an Apple loyalist, a frustrated app developer, or a regulator in Brussels or Beijing, what happens in this suit will echo for years far beyond the iPhone.

Some great Deals Back to Episodes