False Claims Act Insights explores how the U.S. government uses the False Claims Act (FCA) to stamp out fraud and corruption in government contracts. Each episode, Jonathan Porter, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and currently a partner with Husch Blackwell’s White Collar, Internal Investigations & Compliance team, chats with preeminent guests to provide listeners with an up-to-date understanding of the FCA, including trends in recent litigation and compliance efforts. The show also explores those elements of the FCA that make it a uniquely powerful tool for the government against private business, including the Act’s utilization of whistleblowers and its qui tam provisions, as well as evolving theories of FCA liability that expand the boundaries of what the Act covers, including cybersecurity and so-called reverse FCA claims.
All content for False Claims Act Insights is the property of Jonathan Porter and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
False Claims Act Insights explores how the U.S. government uses the False Claims Act (FCA) to stamp out fraud and corruption in government contracts. Each episode, Jonathan Porter, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and currently a partner with Husch Blackwell’s White Collar, Internal Investigations & Compliance team, chats with preeminent guests to provide listeners with an up-to-date understanding of the FCA, including trends in recent litigation and compliance efforts. The show also explores those elements of the FCA that make it a uniquely powerful tool for the government against private business, including the Act’s utilization of whistleblowers and its qui tam provisions, as well as evolving theories of FCA liability that expand the boundaries of what the Act covers, including cybersecurity and so-called reverse FCA claims.
Host Jonathan Porter welcomes Abe Souza, a new member of Husch Blackwell’s White Collar, Internal Investigations, & Compliance team, to the podcast to discuss newly released Department of Justice data regarding qui tam litigation, as well as DOJ’s False Claims Act priorities and best practices for defusing FCA investigations. There was a record number of qui tam lawsuits filed in 2024, and while whistleblower filings hit an all-time high, DOJ’s recoveries and investigative resources have remained mostly flat, leading to a crucial question—how does DOJ decide which qui tams to pursue?
Jonathan and Abe use their experience serving within DOJ to shed light on how DOJ prioritizes FCA investigations. The discussion touches on the time-management aspects of an Assistant U.S. Attorney’s job and how these time limitations force AUSAs to focus on cases where there is a potential to secure a significant settlement or judgment and where the underlying allegations detail egregious conduct accompanied by strong evidence that can be marshaled at trial. Additionally, DOJ is more apt to end an investigation when there is some evidence of a violation, but the violation was immaterial to the government’s payment decision.
The conversation then shifts to explore how qui tam complaints make their way through the legal system and how defendants can best defend these types of investigations. There is often a substantial degree of investigative activity already ongoing when defendants learn of an FCA investigation, usually via a civil investigative demand. Jonathan and Abe discuss the importance of the tone of initial and subsequent communications between defendants and the government, as they can play an important role in whether the government ultimately elects to join the lawsuit. While not dispositive, declinations are hugely influential, as many whistleblowers will voluntarily dismiss FCA actions if the government decides not to join the suit. Jonathan and Abe explain the inflection points of qui tam litigation and how DOJ approaches declination and dismissal requests based on how the case is proceeding.
Jonathan and Abe also cover what happens in qui tam cases after DOJ declines to join a lawsuit and how defendants can manage litigation risk in these instances.
False Claims Act Insights
False Claims Act Insights explores how the U.S. government uses the False Claims Act (FCA) to stamp out fraud and corruption in government contracts. Each episode, Jonathan Porter, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and currently a partner with Husch Blackwell’s White Collar, Internal Investigations & Compliance team, chats with preeminent guests to provide listeners with an up-to-date understanding of the FCA, including trends in recent litigation and compliance efforts. The show also explores those elements of the FCA that make it a uniquely powerful tool for the government against private business, including the Act’s utilization of whistleblowers and its qui tam provisions, as well as evolving theories of FCA liability that expand the boundaries of what the Act covers, including cybersecurity and so-called reverse FCA claims.
