F*ck Your Sensitivity - The Mad Ramblings of a Gen X-er
Online Big Blue Entertainment LLC
132 episodes
1 week ago
Politics and space rarely share a headline, but today they collide. We open with the House’s 427–1 vote to push more Epstein files into the light and ask the hard question: how do we balance public transparency with the legal duty to protect victims, witnesses, and grand jury secrecy? We lay out why one member voted no, what “privacy safeguards” actually mean, and how media clarifications shifted the narrative after early attempts to tie names and emails to people who weren’t accused of crime...
All content for F*ck Your Sensitivity - The Mad Ramblings of a Gen X-er is the property of Online Big Blue Entertainment LLC and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Politics and space rarely share a headline, but today they collide. We open with the House’s 427–1 vote to push more Epstein files into the light and ask the hard question: how do we balance public transparency with the legal duty to protect victims, witnesses, and grand jury secrecy? We lay out why one member voted no, what “privacy safeguards” actually mean, and how media clarifications shifted the narrative after early attempts to tie names and emails to people who weren’t accused of crime...
Start with a sharp laugh and end with a sharper pencil—that’s the ride. We open on the “No Kings” protests and ask the one question that keeps getting dodged: what exactly makes a leader a “king,” and where’s the proof? The more we push for a concrete example, the more the answers dissolve into vibes. That gap matters, because movements that can’t define their claims can’t measure their wins, and policy built on fog tends to become expensive fast. From there, we move into the meat: pandemic-...
F*ck Your Sensitivity - The Mad Ramblings of a Gen X-er
Politics and space rarely share a headline, but today they collide. We open with the House’s 427–1 vote to push more Epstein files into the light and ask the hard question: how do we balance public transparency with the legal duty to protect victims, witnesses, and grand jury secrecy? We lay out why one member voted no, what “privacy safeguards” actually mean, and how media clarifications shifted the narrative after early attempts to tie names and emails to people who weren’t accused of crime...
