In the journey of building a startup, there is arguably no decision more critical, more emotionally charged, and more foundational to a company's future than how the co-founders decide to divide equity. This conversation goes far beyond just assigning numbers on a spreadsheet; it's a profound reflection of each founder's perceived value, a significant test of the strength of their professional and personal relationships, and a predictive measure of their future commitment to the venture. If you get this conversation right, you establish a solid foundation of fairness and mutual alignment that can help your partnership weather any storm the startup world throws at you. However, if you get it wrong, you risk planting the subtle seeds of resentment and discord that can eventually tear a company apart from the inside, even when it appears successful from the outside. Far too many founders shy away from this admittedly difficult conversation, choosing instead to default to what seems like an easy and fair solution: a 50/50 split. They do this without deeply considering the many nuances of each individual's contribution, the different levels of risk they're taking on, and their expected long-term involvement. This avoidance is certainly understandable—it's a tough talk to have—but it's a critical mistake that can lead to devastating consequences down the road, particularly when you start bringing venture capital into the picture and outside stakeholders begin scrutinizing your cap table. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.