A week of careful pressure can change more than a month of flashy advances. We break down how strategic strikes against industry, energy nodes, and transport hubs—paired with relentless depot targeting—are shrinking the sustainment window and forcing hard choices across the theater. From Sumy and Kharkov to the Dnipro axis, fixing actions and rear-area shaping have turned maps into ledgers, where the most meaningful entries are fuel stocks destroyed, EW suites silenced, and reserves committed under duress.Our conversation with Colonel A.C. Oguntoye digs into why Central Donetsk remains the operational center of gravity and how encirclement dynamics are reaching a decisive phase. We explore the logic behind doctrinal patience on the western front, where positional gains and steady fires deliver more lasting effects than risky breakthroughs. We also unpack the rising tempo of air defense—intercepting guided munitions and mass UAV attacks—to protect maneuver units and logistics hubs so deep strikes can continue without disruption. The picture that emerges is one of cumulative attrition: rather than seeking a single decisive battle, commanders are tightening every screw that keeps an army fighting.Listeners will come away with a grounded sense of how modern campaigns are decided: not only by who holds a village, but by who can repair vehicles faster, replenish artillery shells, secure energy for factories, and keep ISR flowing under electronic and kinetic pressure. When Abrams and Leopard losses show up alongside depot strikes and EW suppression, it signals more than tactical success—it points to a strategic squeeze where manpower, sustainment, and industrial capacity outweigh local maneuvers. If you value clear, systems-level analysis of the war, this briefing connects the dots.If the episode helped clarify the state of the campaign, subscribe, share it with a friend who follows military strategy, and leave a review so we can keep bringing you rigorous, on-the-ground insights.