Title: Evaluating the Reverse Slide Embedding Method vs. Heat Extractor Embedding in the Mohs Laboratory: A Comparative Quality Review of 100 Cases Authors: Tashsa Cromedy, Heather Frye, Ochsner MD Anderson Cancer Center, St. Tammany Cancer Center A Campus of Ochsner Medical Center Abstract:  Overview Accurate tissue embedding is critical in Mohs micrographic surgery for complete margin assessment. This study evaluates the efficacy of a reverse slide embedding method compared to the conventional heat extractor technique. The goal was to determine which method yields fewer artifacts or discrepancies that may compromise histologic interpretation and margin assessment. Methods A total of 100 Mohs cases were retrospectively reviewed in a controlled laboratory setting. Two embedding techniques were compared:Reverse Slide Method: 50 cases were embedded by placing the tissue on a chilled slide before embedding, ensuring orientation preservation and minimizing heat exposure.Heat Extractor Method: 50 cases were embedded using the traditional heat extractor to flatten and orient tissue in the embedding medium.All slides were reviewed by a Mohs surgeon for processing artifacts, orientation challenges, and histologic discrepancies. Validation The Mohs surgeon identified a total of 17 artifact inconsistencies or discrepancies across all cases:13 instances were associated with the heat extractor method.4 instances occurred with the reverse slide method.These findings suggest that the reverse slide method may reduce artifacts and improve embedding accuracy compared to the heat extractor, offering potential benefits for tissue integrity and diagnostic confidence in the Mohs laboratory. Conclusion The reverse slide embedding method demonstrated a significant reduction in embedding-related artifacts compared to the heat extractor technique. These findings support its use in the Mohs laboratory to enhance tissue quality, reduce the risk of diagnostic errors, and improve patient outcomes. Further studies with larger sample sizes and multi-lab validations are recommended to confirm these results.