Episode 9: Court reports and demonstrator sports

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/84/a4/b5/84a4b5d6-1363-716a-c72b-7708e3cb00e7/mza_1980119952155564718.jpg/600x600bb.jpg

Is That a Convenient Time?

A Convenient Time

10 episodes

6 hours ago

Three South Australian barristers from Nexus Chambers discuss legal and other topics

Business

RSS

All content for Is That a Convenient Time? is the property of A Convenient Time and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Three South Australian barristers from Nexus Chambers discuss legal and other topics

Business

https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/38138675/38138675-1689834898720-3cc4c2d88af9d.jpg

Episode 9: Court reports and demonstrator sports

Is That a Convenient Time?

39 minutes 2 seconds

1 year ago

Episode 9: Court reports and demonstrator sports

Darren, Will and Scott do a recent High Court case wrap up and ask the burning question: should noodling come back as an Olympic demonstrator sport at the Brisbane Games?

Cases reviewed:

Tesseract International Pty Ltd v Pascale Construction Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 24
Mallonland Pty Ltd v Advanta Seeds Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 25
Moore (a pseudonym) v The King [2024] HCA 30
BQ v the King [2024] HCA 29
Chu v Lin, in the matter of Cold Stone Capital Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 766
Productivity Partners Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; Wills v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2024] HCA 27