The sources for this Deep Dive podcast detail the specifics and subsequent rejection of a zoning variance request submitted by the Newtown Athletic Club (NAC). to the Newtown Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) on 4 December 2025 . The request was to legalize an improperly located sign.
The NAC was seeking relief to allow a wall sign, installed in 2019, to remain in its current location facing the Newtown Bypass, violating size restrictions and the distance requirements stipulated in the municipal code.
According to the briefing document, the NAC claimed the placement was due to an "inadvertent installation error" that contradicted a previous 2014 decision, which led to a zoning violation notice issued in 2025.
During the hearing where the application was ultimately denied, the board chair expressed concern on the record about the Township's unusual silence on the matter, suggesting a potential issue with selective enforcement of sign ordinances.
All content for Mack's Newtown Voice is the property of Mack's Newtown Voice and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The sources for this Deep Dive podcast detail the specifics and subsequent rejection of a zoning variance request submitted by the Newtown Athletic Club (NAC). to the Newtown Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) on 4 December 2025 . The request was to legalize an improperly located sign.
The NAC was seeking relief to allow a wall sign, installed in 2019, to remain in its current location facing the Newtown Bypass, violating size restrictions and the distance requirements stipulated in the municipal code.
According to the briefing document, the NAC claimed the placement was due to an "inadvertent installation error" that contradicted a previous 2014 decision, which led to a zoning violation notice issued in 2025.
During the hearing where the application was ultimately denied, the board chair expressed concern on the record about the Township's unusual silence on the matter, suggesting a potential issue with selective enforcement of sign ordinances.
Documents and audio recordings detail matters brought before the Newtown Township Planning Commission at its 18 November 2025 meeting. The Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) applications under consideration primarily concern zoning variances for local businesses.
The most extensive discussion concerns a signage application for Melange on Sycamore, where the applicants sought approval for nine etched glass signs, a significant increase over the permitted two, which sparked considerable debate among the board regarding both zoning compliance and the unauthorized removal of historic windows from the building.
The overall consensus from the meeting excerpts suggests a strong opposition to granting the requested variances for Melange due to the number of signs and past noncompliance with historical preservation standards.
Other ZHB applications were First Trust Bank, Community Veterinary Partners, and Vecchia Osteria. First Trust Bank requested variances regarding signage along Durham Road. Community Veterinary Partners is seeking permission for an expansion of a nonconforming veterinary clinic use at 228 N. Sycamore Street. The final case of the night, from the restaurant Vecchia Osteria, offered a straightforward and surprising path to approval: strategic growth.
Mack's Newtown Voice
The sources for this Deep Dive podcast detail the specifics and subsequent rejection of a zoning variance request submitted by the Newtown Athletic Club (NAC). to the Newtown Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) on 4 December 2025 . The request was to legalize an improperly located sign.
The NAC was seeking relief to allow a wall sign, installed in 2019, to remain in its current location facing the Newtown Bypass, violating size restrictions and the distance requirements stipulated in the municipal code.
According to the briefing document, the NAC claimed the placement was due to an "inadvertent installation error" that contradicted a previous 2014 decision, which led to a zoning violation notice issued in 2025.
During the hearing where the application was ultimately denied, the board chair expressed concern on the record about the Township's unusual silence on the matter, suggesting a potential issue with selective enforcement of sign ordinances.
