Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Business
Society & Culture
Sports
History
News
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
Β© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/30/72/53/307253a5-4b5f-0a39-dfee-d4543ac1cac7/mza_2063193576530305344.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Not On Record Podcast
Possibly Correct Media
195 episodes
3 weeks ago
Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord ## Episode Description In Episode 194 of Not on Record, seasoned Canadian criminal defense lawyers Joseph Neuberger and Michael Lacy dive deep into the realities of jury trials in Canada. Sparked by a recent National Post article exploring the inner workings of juries, they debate whether they'd choose a jury or a judge-alone trial if charged with a serious offense. The discussion covers the impact of the 2019 abolition of peremptory challenges, the challenges of selecting an impartial jury in today's polarized climate, the importance of storytelling and engagement in jury addresses, cultural shifts affecting civic duty and bias, and why many defense lawyers now lean toward bench trials especially in sexual assault cases. With candid insights from decades of trial experience, dog interruptions, and a call to restore peremptory challenges, this episode is a raw look at the strengths, flaws, and uncertainties of Canada's jury system.
Show more...
Education
RSS
All content for Not On Record Podcast is the property of Possibly Correct Media and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord ## Episode Description In Episode 194 of Not on Record, seasoned Canadian criminal defense lawyers Joseph Neuberger and Michael Lacy dive deep into the realities of jury trials in Canada. Sparked by a recent National Post article exploring the inner workings of juries, they debate whether they'd choose a jury or a judge-alone trial if charged with a serious offense. The discussion covers the impact of the 2019 abolition of peremptory challenges, the challenges of selecting an impartial jury in today's polarized climate, the importance of storytelling and engagement in jury addresses, cultural shifts affecting civic duty and bias, and why many defense lawyers now lean toward bench trials especially in sexual assault cases. With candid insights from decades of trial experience, dog interruptions, and a call to restore peremptory challenges, this episode is a raw look at the strengths, flaws, and uncertainties of Canada's jury system.
Show more...
Education
https://i1.sndcdn.com/artworks-NPZyRSik7RzqrnRn-ZN2Gkg-t3000x3000.png
EP#181 | Self Defence Laws: Canada vs. The United States
Not On Record Podcast
40 minutes 28 seconds
4 months ago
EP#181 | Self Defence Laws: Canada vs. The United States
Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord πŸ”ΉShort Description: πŸ’ EP#181 Joseph and Alper Yulmaz contrast Canada’s self-defence (s.34) with U.S. castle doctrineβ€”no duty to retreat, proportionality/necessity, and the modified objective test for homeowners. βš–οΈπŸ“’πŸŽ™οΈ πŸ“Meta Description: πŸ“’ In EP#181 Not On Record explains Canada’s self-defence s.34 vs U.S. castle doctrineβ€”no duty to retreat, proportionality, stand-your-ground myths, and how courts assess reasonableness. πŸŽ§πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈπŸ’ |Not On Record 😍 𝐈 π‡πŽππ„ π˜πŽπ” π†π”π˜π’ π„ππ‰πŽπ˜ π“π‡πˆπ’! β–Ά If you enjoy this video, please like it and share it. β–Ά Don't forget to subscribe to this channel for more updates. β–Ά Subscribe now: https://www.youtube.com/@NotOnRecord?sub_confirmation=1 ⚠️ πƒπˆπ’π‚π‹π€πˆπŒπ„π‘: We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of watching any of my publications. You acknowledge that you use the information I provide at your own risk. do your own research. βœ–οΈ π‚πŽππ˜π‘πˆπ†π‡π“ ππŽπ“πˆπ‚π„: This video and my YouTube channel contain dialog, music, and image that are property of " Not On Record " You are authorized to share the video link and channel and embed this video in your website or others as long as a link back to my YouTube Channel is provided @NotOnRecord β–Ά 𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐃 πŠπ„π˜π–πŽπ‘πƒπ’:- #ep176 #notonrecord #hockeycanadatrial #hockeycanada #trialverdict #sportsandjustice #courtroomanalysis #legalpodcast #truecrimepodcast #canadianjustice #athletesandaccountability #legalverdict #sportslaw #highprofiletrial #realcasebreakdown #legalcommentary #truthandjustice #courtroomdrama #canadianlegalnews #justiceinspotlight #sportscontroversy #legaldiscussion #lawandorderpodcast #consentinsports #hockeynews2025 #legalanalysis #justiceforvictims #publicreaction #caseverdict #crimeandlaw #sportsintegrity Please share with your friends and family. Also don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell to notify you if I post a new video. Much love and God bless Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord In this episode Joseph walks through Canada’s self-defence law (Criminal Code s.34) and contrasts it with U.S. β€œcastle doctrine” and stand-your-ground frameworks. With articling student Alper Yulmaz joining, they unpack proportionality and necessity, why Canada has no duty to retreat yet still weighs available options, and how courts apply a modified subjective objective test, considering the accused’s size, experience, trauma history, and the context inside a home. Recent tragedies and high-profile charges are discussed without trial-by-media, along with Supreme Court guidance (e.g., Hodgson, Khill), to show that Canadian law is broader and more flexible than many think; designed to protect homeowners while avoiding blanket presumptions that can produce unjust outcomes. R. v. Hodgson, 2024 SCC 25 - https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024canlii11123/2024canlii11123.html?resultId=faf026722dfb4b3a9e3dc803930bbd9b&searchId=2025-09-07T08:08:30:114/750c412190cc49eba6030d6a4fba89fa R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37 (CanLII), [2021] 2 SCR 948 - https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2021/2021scc37/2021scc37.html?resultId=106af67b2fdf4afd82ff35a092a71ebc&searchId=2025-09-07T08:11:40:226/e117a95adc244d88b9ab89e6f5053778
Not On Record Podcast
Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord ## Episode Description In Episode 194 of Not on Record, seasoned Canadian criminal defense lawyers Joseph Neuberger and Michael Lacy dive deep into the realities of jury trials in Canada. Sparked by a recent National Post article exploring the inner workings of juries, they debate whether they'd choose a jury or a judge-alone trial if charged with a serious offense. The discussion covers the impact of the 2019 abolition of peremptory challenges, the challenges of selecting an impartial jury in today's polarized climate, the importance of storytelling and engagement in jury addresses, cultural shifts affecting civic duty and bias, and why many defense lawyers now lean toward bench trials especially in sexual assault cases. With candid insights from decades of trial experience, dog interruptions, and a call to restore peremptory challenges, this episode is a raw look at the strengths, flaws, and uncertainties of Canada's jury system.