Welcome to the supplementary episode to episode 4 that we published two weeks ago. The goal of these episodes is not fixed at this point, it is my little experiment to see what value can I extract from our main episode and what other additional content that can we package for you that makes the podcast more than just audio entertainment.

For this particular episode, as promised from the main episode, my goal is to have a look at some of the claims that the three of us made during our main episode, and to unpack them and link them to some underlying research or data. When we are recording, we try by all means to keep the conversation as natural as possible and unscripted, and as an unavoidable consequences of this, we are bout to utter some things that we are not a 100% sure of, or refer to events that we don’t exactly remember the details of, or make claims in passing that are worth exploring a little bit further. So in this episode, we are going to slow things down a bit and do some fact checking and deconstructing some arguments, providing some other necessary contexts, and other means of just enriching the original conversation we had.

I am going to take it for granted that you have already listened to the original episode, so I wont be reiterating anything verbatim or in great details, so if you have not listened to the main episode.