Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
Music
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/81/48/2a/81482a18-3223-a3c7-3285-bfffec80bc77/mza_17066979910753137591.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Perspectives with Neilo
PwNeilo
81 episodes
1 week ago
There’s a metaphor often used in diplomatic and academic circles to describe China’s influence — the anaconda in the chandelier. Everyone can see it. Everyone knows it’s there. But no one wants to acknowledge it, because naming it would mean having to act. The phrase was coined in 2002 by the American scholar Perry Link, in an essay for The New York Review of Books. One of the world’s foremost experts on Chinese language, literature, and political expression, Link used the metaphor to describe the quiet but pervasive power of the Chinese Communist Party — a system that enforces obedience not only through censorship, but through fear and self-censorship. He wrote that the Chinese state’s authority doesn’t resemble a roaring tiger or a fire-breathing dragon, but a massive anaconda coiled silently overhead. It rarely moves. It doesn’t need to. Its message is implicit: you decide. And under its shadow, people — journalists, academics, politicians — instinctively adjust what they say and do, often without being told. The fear this creates isn’t dramatic or overt. It’s subtle, normalized, and deeply ingrained — a quiet calculation that becomes part of the landscape. And it is precisely that psychological control that makes the anaconda so effective. Legend tells us that St Patrick banished all the snakes from Ireland. But by the early 1990s, it appears that one very large snake had quietly found its way back into the Oireachtas — not as a myth, but as a political reality. In this special episode of Perspectives with Neilo, we examine how fear of offending Beijing has shaped Irish government behaviour for decades. From Ireland’s muted response to China’s human rights abuses, to its cautious stance on Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan, we explore how economic pressure and political self-censorship have influenced policy, limited transparency, and raised serious questions about Ireland’s democratic resilience. This is a conversation about power, fear, and silence — and about what happens to a democracy when everyone sees the anaconda, but no one dares to say its name. Music Credits: Cinematic Piano Ambient Trailer Soundtrack by Open-Music-for-Videos via Pixabay Sound Soul (This Logo Reveal) by Diamond_Tunes via Pixabay Slow immersion by SamuelFJohanns via Pixabay Tibet by AdvGold via Pixabay Shining Bright Dusk by FreeSoundServer via Pixabay Enter the realm - no Piano by SamuelFJohanns via Pixabay Speeches: Excerpt from Closing statement by Josep Borrell Fonelles, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission on Sept 13th, 2022, provided courtesy of the European Parliament Multimedia Centre. © European Union, 2022 – Source: EP. / Excerpts from Senator Michael McDowell's speech at Seanad Eireann, Human Rights in China: Motion, Dec 1st, 2021 provided courtesy of the Houses of the Oireachtas. © Houses of the Oireachtas, 2021.
Show more...
News
RSS
All content for Perspectives with Neilo is the property of PwNeilo and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
There’s a metaphor often used in diplomatic and academic circles to describe China’s influence — the anaconda in the chandelier. Everyone can see it. Everyone knows it’s there. But no one wants to acknowledge it, because naming it would mean having to act. The phrase was coined in 2002 by the American scholar Perry Link, in an essay for The New York Review of Books. One of the world’s foremost experts on Chinese language, literature, and political expression, Link used the metaphor to describe the quiet but pervasive power of the Chinese Communist Party — a system that enforces obedience not only through censorship, but through fear and self-censorship. He wrote that the Chinese state’s authority doesn’t resemble a roaring tiger or a fire-breathing dragon, but a massive anaconda coiled silently overhead. It rarely moves. It doesn’t need to. Its message is implicit: you decide. And under its shadow, people — journalists, academics, politicians — instinctively adjust what they say and do, often without being told. The fear this creates isn’t dramatic or overt. It’s subtle, normalized, and deeply ingrained — a quiet calculation that becomes part of the landscape. And it is precisely that psychological control that makes the anaconda so effective. Legend tells us that St Patrick banished all the snakes from Ireland. But by the early 1990s, it appears that one very large snake had quietly found its way back into the Oireachtas — not as a myth, but as a political reality. In this special episode of Perspectives with Neilo, we examine how fear of offending Beijing has shaped Irish government behaviour for decades. From Ireland’s muted response to China’s human rights abuses, to its cautious stance on Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan, we explore how economic pressure and political self-censorship have influenced policy, limited transparency, and raised serious questions about Ireland’s democratic resilience. This is a conversation about power, fear, and silence — and about what happens to a democracy when everyone sees the anaconda, but no one dares to say its name. Music Credits: Cinematic Piano Ambient Trailer Soundtrack by Open-Music-for-Videos via Pixabay Sound Soul (This Logo Reveal) by Diamond_Tunes via Pixabay Slow immersion by SamuelFJohanns via Pixabay Tibet by AdvGold via Pixabay Shining Bright Dusk by FreeSoundServer via Pixabay Enter the realm - no Piano by SamuelFJohanns via Pixabay Speeches: Excerpt from Closing statement by Josep Borrell Fonelles, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission on Sept 13th, 2022, provided courtesy of the European Parliament Multimedia Centre. © European Union, 2022 – Source: EP. / Excerpts from Senator Michael McDowell's speech at Seanad Eireann, Human Rights in China: Motion, Dec 1st, 2021 provided courtesy of the Houses of the Oireachtas. © Houses of the Oireachtas, 2021.
Show more...
News
https://i1.sndcdn.com/artworks-ywMhK7HZ3HCJmHoz-PgRKow-t3000x3000.png
Resist Transnational Repression, Defy Totalitarianism
Perspectives with Neilo
27 minutes 18 seconds
6 months ago
Resist Transnational Repression, Defy Totalitarianism
On June 4th 1989, student-led demonstrations which had been brewing across China for a few months were violently crushed by the Chinese Communist Party who declared martial law and sent their troops onto the streets of Beijing to end the protests Estimates of the death toll vary from several hundred to several thousand, with thousands more wounded. While the massacre has been downplayed and deleted from public record in China, it has been commemorated outside of China in the intervening years. Prior to 2020 the biggest Tiananmen Commemorations used to take place in Victoria Park in Hong Kong. However, after the introduction of the National Security Law on June 30th, 2020 and the subsequent CCP clamp down on democracy - any hint of remembrance has been rigorously stamped out and forbidden. In nearby Taiwan where freedom and democracy prevail, the Tiananmen Square Massacre is commemorated each year on June 4th. However, this year, even Taipei was not free from threat. A number of Taiwan’s news outlets reported that eight government offices, including the Presidential Office and Executive Yuan received bomb threats by email on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square crackdown. The messages warned of attacks if memorial events were held. Police traced the sender’s IP address to the U.S.but it is expected the real location was masked through a VPN and searches of government buildings did not yield any suspicious devices. Despite the threats and the inclement weather, the Tiananmen commemoration still went ahead in Taipei. According to local media, about 3,000 people gathered for a candlelight vigil organized by the New School for Democracy and other human rights groups. The event took place on Democracy Boulevard outside Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall, with the theme "Resist Transnational Repression, Defy Totalitarianism." It featured brief speeches by human rights advocates from Taiwan, Tibet, China and Hong Kong, as well as other nations. This is our report from the event. #TiananmenSquare #TiananmenMassacre #June4thMassacre #1989Protests #BeijingMassacre #CCPViolence #TiananmenCrackdown #RememberJune4 #HumanRights #FreeSpeech #DemocracyNow #FreedomMatters #TransnationalRepression #StandWithHongKong #StandWithTaiwan #ChinaCensorship #NeverForgetTiananmen #HistoryPodcast #HumanRightsPodcast #ChinaPodcast #PoliticalPodcast #PodcastEpisode #TrueStoriesPodcast #FreedomOfSpeech
Perspectives with Neilo
There’s a metaphor often used in diplomatic and academic circles to describe China’s influence — the anaconda in the chandelier. Everyone can see it. Everyone knows it’s there. But no one wants to acknowledge it, because naming it would mean having to act. The phrase was coined in 2002 by the American scholar Perry Link, in an essay for The New York Review of Books. One of the world’s foremost experts on Chinese language, literature, and political expression, Link used the metaphor to describe the quiet but pervasive power of the Chinese Communist Party — a system that enforces obedience not only through censorship, but through fear and self-censorship. He wrote that the Chinese state’s authority doesn’t resemble a roaring tiger or a fire-breathing dragon, but a massive anaconda coiled silently overhead. It rarely moves. It doesn’t need to. Its message is implicit: you decide. And under its shadow, people — journalists, academics, politicians — instinctively adjust what they say and do, often without being told. The fear this creates isn’t dramatic or overt. It’s subtle, normalized, and deeply ingrained — a quiet calculation that becomes part of the landscape. And it is precisely that psychological control that makes the anaconda so effective. Legend tells us that St Patrick banished all the snakes from Ireland. But by the early 1990s, it appears that one very large snake had quietly found its way back into the Oireachtas — not as a myth, but as a political reality. In this special episode of Perspectives with Neilo, we examine how fear of offending Beijing has shaped Irish government behaviour for decades. From Ireland’s muted response to China’s human rights abuses, to its cautious stance on Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan, we explore how economic pressure and political self-censorship have influenced policy, limited transparency, and raised serious questions about Ireland’s democratic resilience. This is a conversation about power, fear, and silence — and about what happens to a democracy when everyone sees the anaconda, but no one dares to say its name. Music Credits: Cinematic Piano Ambient Trailer Soundtrack by Open-Music-for-Videos via Pixabay Sound Soul (This Logo Reveal) by Diamond_Tunes via Pixabay Slow immersion by SamuelFJohanns via Pixabay Tibet by AdvGold via Pixabay Shining Bright Dusk by FreeSoundServer via Pixabay Enter the realm - no Piano by SamuelFJohanns via Pixabay Speeches: Excerpt from Closing statement by Josep Borrell Fonelles, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission on Sept 13th, 2022, provided courtesy of the European Parliament Multimedia Centre. © European Union, 2022 – Source: EP. / Excerpts from Senator Michael McDowell's speech at Seanad Eireann, Human Rights in China: Motion, Dec 1st, 2021 provided courtesy of the Houses of the Oireachtas. © Houses of the Oireachtas, 2021.