The source, an essay by language philosopher Bry Willis, explores how everyday grammar subtly enforces deep philosophical assumptions and contributes to institutional "gatekeeping" within philosophy. Willis uses the seemingly trivial example of how different languages express feeling cold—as something one "is" (I am cold) versus something one "has" (I have cold)—to argue that grammatical structures are never neutral. These linguistic habits, which the author calls "ontological scaffolding," predispose speakers toward certain metaphysical commitments regarding identity, possession, and consciousness. The essay suggests that this subtle influence of language makes certain philosophical traditions, like the Analytic or Continental divide, feel intuitively correct to their practitioners, and further argues that institutional peer review systems maintain these divisions by rejecting hybrid work as a "genre violation." Ultimately, the text proposes that philosophers must examine the linguistic foundations of their questions, especially because grammatical comfort is often mistaken for ontological agreement.

👉 https://philosophics.blog/2025/12/19/cold-grammar-and-the-quiet-gatekeeping-of-philosophy/