This episode details the appellate journey of State v. Valencia-Lacayo, a criminal case concerning the denial of a motion to suppress evidence and statements following an investigatory stop. The first source, an opinion from the Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, reversed the district court's judgment, finding that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop Arial Valencia-Lacayo because the officers relied only on an unsubstantiated "tip" from a sergeant. However, the second source shows that the Supreme Court of Louisiana granted the State's writ application and reversed the Court of Appeal's ruling. The Supreme Court reinstated the trial court's judgment denying the motion to suppress, concluding that the Court of Appeal improperly substituted its findings for those of the trial court, which had deemed the officers' collective knowledge and testimony credible. This final decision affirmed that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the suppression motion.