Balance Lagging and Leading Indicators
Too often, teams focus only on lagging indicators like weekly output or monthly quality scores. Leading indicators (e.g., plan vs. actual by hour) give you early warning signals, helping you influence outcomes before they happen.
Across manufacturing, warehousing, and supply chain industries, there is a growing trend toward balancing lagging and leading indicators to drive more agile and predictive operations. According to a report by the Lean Enterprise Institute, organizations that integrate leading indicators—such as hourly plan vs. actual performance or first-time-through rates—alongside traditional lagging metrics like monthly output and customer defect rates see a 20% improvement in proactive problem-solving and a 15% reduction in production delays. Leaders are shifting from focusing solely on after-the-fact metrics to emphasizing real-time, forward-looking data that enables early intervention before issues escalate.
In engineering and supply chain environments, balancing both types of indicators is helping teams better manage project risks and operational variability. A Deloitte study shows that engineering teams tracking leading indicators like design cycle times, change request backlogs, and early-phase quality metrics reduce project overruns by up to 14%. In the supply chain sector, companies that monitor leading metrics such as supplier lead times, inventory accuracy rates, and transportation delays in real time have improved on-time delivery rates by 18%. By monitoring these early signals, leaders can adjust processes and resources proactively, reducing costly last-minute corrective actions.
Marketing and service-based industries are also benefiting from a more balanced approach. Research from McKinsey found that marketing teams using leading indicators—such as real-time engagement rates or pipeline conversion ratios—achieve 16% higher campaign success rates compared to teams relying solely on lagging measures like post-campaign ROI. Similarly, service organizations that monitor early-warning metrics such as customer wait times or first-response rates improve customer satisfaction scores by 12%. This trend highlights the growing recognition that leading indicators provide actionable insights to influence results before performance gaps widen.
Industry-wide, leadership insights are increasingly pointing to the importance of creating balanced scorecards that include both real-time (leading) and historical (lagging) metrics. This shift aligns with the rise of Lean, Agile, and Industry 4.0 practices, where dynamic decision-making and data visibility are crucial to sustaining competitive advantage.
Timestamps:
00:00 – Introduction
01:15 – Defining the Purpose Of the Episode
03:45 – Industry Research
06:30 – Real-World Example
08:00 – Key Differences and Application
10:00 – Conclusion and Takeaway
Resources:
The Continuous Improvement Lab: https://www.karassinnovations.com/blog
Book: Shift Happens - How To Lead with Purpose and Discipline Every Day: https://a.co/d/0JZ8auW
Subscribe for more insights:
https://open.spotify.com/show/6MqoJ1aZM1VA5cgeWvjlnX?si=86901c0534b14403
https://open.spotify.com/show/3YqjoH6AZg7AdDYHyCwDY0?si=ecc12289b5e84f29
Connect with Us:
Website: https://www.karassinnovations.com
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/lenierjohnson
Meta:https://www.facebook.com/share/1AZorbNg72/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Substack: https://karassinnovations.substack.com
Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/karassinnovations.bsky.social
#ContinuousImprovement #Podcast #ProcessExcellence #Leadership #Lean #SixSigma #TheContinuousImprovementLab #TheSystemThinkerShow #MOS #Management Operating Systems #Project2025 #Sludge #scottgalloway #karaswisher