An intellectual property perspective from the IP Consultancy, Byte Law®, criticizes several published patent applications assigned to OpenAI OpCo, LLC, arguing that they are legally vulnerable and likely unpatentable. The analysis asserts that these applications—covering automated metadata generation, personalized AI memory, and universal API integration—fail the Alice/Mayo legal framework because they attempt to patent abstract human cognitive processes and organizational methods. Specifically, the patents are deemed ineligible because they claim automation of mental acts like summarizing or selective remembering, relying only on conventional computing elements rather than providing a fundamental technical improvement to computer functionality. Ultimately, the perspective concludes that OpenAI is attempting to monopolize abstract concepts without demonstrating the required non-conventional technological advancement. the full analysis is available, here MAYBE SAM ALTMANS INVESTORS SHOULD JUST GO ASK ALICE WHY OPENAIS MOST RECENT CLAIMS ARE LOST IN THE PATENT WONDERLAND