Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Sports
Society & Culture
Business
News
History
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts211/v4/7c/43/b3/7c43b363-4f09-dc82-2f5e-1e891a63cc66/mza_8773837813585210483.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
The InventionSession Podcast by ByteLaw®
bytelaw
51 episodes
3 days ago
Observations and Opinions regarding Patents and Inventions of Current Interest
Show more...
Technology
RSS
All content for The InventionSession Podcast by ByteLaw® is the property of bytelaw and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Observations and Opinions regarding Patents and Inventions of Current Interest
Show more...
Technology
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts211/v4/7c/43/b3/7c43b363-4f09-dc82-2f5e-1e891a63cc66/mza_8773837813585210483.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
The Patent That Almost Wasn't: Why the Kaifi v Apple Lawsuit Should Be Silenced
The InventionSession Podcast by ByteLaw®
14 minutes
3 months ago
The Patent That Almost Wasn't: Why the Kaifi v Apple Lawsuit Should Be Silenced
The provided text The Patent That Almost Wasn't Why the Kaifi v Apple Lawsuit Should Be Silenced, argues for the invalidation and dismissal of the Kaifi LLC v. Apple Inc. lawsuit, see KAIFI LLC vs Apple which centers on U.S. Patent No. 8,930,196 (the '196 patent) related to voice assistant wake word technology. The source contends that the patent is unmerited because its core concept was obvious from the outset, combining existing technologies in a predictable way. Furthermore, it asserts that the patent's claims merely cover an abstract idea implemented with generic computing components for a known purpose, making it ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court's Alice framework. The text highlights the patent's troubled journey through the USPTO, where it faced repeated rejections for obviousness and was only granted after its claims were significantly narrowed to a specific, non-inventive implementation detail. Ultimately, the author believes the lawsuit represents an attempt to exploit a dubious patent to stifle innovation, advocating for its dismissal.
The InventionSession Podcast by ByteLaw®
Observations and Opinions regarding Patents and Inventions of Current Interest