The provided analysis from ByteLaw® Why the Headwater v Amazon case Rests on Seemingly Fatally Flawed Patents critiques a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Headwater Research LLC against Amazon see Case 7-25-cv-00286 Headwater v Amazon et al. The core argument is that the two patents central to Headwater's claim—U.S. Patent Nos. 9,615,192 and 10,321,320—are fundamentally flawed and invalid. ByteLaw contends these patents should not have been granted because they represent obvious combinations of existing technologies and describe abstract ideas without an inventive concept, failing to meet legal patentability standards. Specifically, the analysis details how the '192 patent concerning a message link server, and the '320 patent covering a wireless network buffered message system, both lack novelty and inventiveness by merely applying well-known communication and data management principles to electronic messaging. Consequently, ByteLaw concludes that Headwater's lawsuit, which targets Amazon's crucial push notification services, lacks merit and should be dismissed.