KEYWORDS

Thanksgiving, politics, social psychology, cognitive biases, in-group, out-group, morality, social media, political division, bridging divides

SUMMARY

In this episode, Dr. Tom Kiely explores the psychological factors contributing to political division, particularly during family gatherings like Thanksgiving. He delves into social psychology, cognitive biases, in-group versus out-group dynamics, and the role of morality in political judgment. The discussion also highlights the impact of social media algorithms on political discourse and offers pathways for bridging divides through empathy, critical thinking, and intergroup dialogue.

SUBSCRIBE:

🔔 Subscribe to access bi-weekly podcast episodes: 

[PODCAST LINK] 

GET IN TOUCH WITH DR. KIELY:

PRIVATE PRACTICE WEBSITE

PSYCHOLOGY TODAY

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

SUICIDE AND CRISIS HOTLINE: 

Dial 988

https://988lifeline.org/

MUSIC:

Sketchbook: Prigida

https://uppbeat.io/t/prigida/sketch-book

License code: XQEICUBN8C43SY4Q

Poem: Soundroll

https://uppbeat.io/t/soundroll/poem

License code: IF5E7OHG2FZLQTRN

Street Cred: Anteros

https://uppbeat.io/t/anteros/street-cred

License code: W7XEHCU0U6DSGN9Q

Stellar: Jeff Kaale

https://uppbeat.io/t/jeff-kaale/stellar

License code: DQGJCF9J0TGLSPLZ

Throng: Swoop

https://uppbeat.io/t/swoop/throng

License code: FB1EMQLHBUNI0LXU

New Chapter: Jeffrey Kaale

https://uppbeat.io/t/jeff-kaale/new-chapter

License code: PDH53KC9G10HLCGS

Summer Pop Lemonade: SonicMood

https://audiojungle.net/item/summer-pop-lemonade/53371178

License code: 14a92b7e-e924-4c82-9de5-f8aa3518b752

Rock Your Surfboard: Yeti Music

https://uppbeat.io/t/yeti-music/rock-your-surfboard

License code: 343U0UCD8ZHJYTR

SELECTED REFERENCES:

• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M.6 (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236.
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley.

• Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2023, September 5). Polarization, Democracy, and Political Violence in the United States: What the Research Says. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/09/polarization-democracy-and-political-violence-in-the-united-states-what-the-research-says?lang=en
• DePaul University. (n.d.). Bridging the Divide: 30 Strategies for Reducing Polarization at the Neighborhood Level. https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/publications/publications-and-learnings/Documents/Bridging%20the%20Divide%2030%20Strategies%20for%20Reducing%20Polarization%20at%20the%20Neighborhood%20Level.pdf

• Levy, R. (2021).7 Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment. American Economic Review, 111(3), 831-870.

• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
• Number Analytics. (n.d.). Cognitive Biases in Politics. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/cognitive-biases-in-politics
• Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press.
• ResearchGate.net. (n.d.). Politics makes bastards of us all: Why moral judgment is politically situational. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377439620_Politics_makes_bastards_of_us_all_Why_moral_judgment_is_politically_situational
• Stanford Graduate School of Business. (n.d.). 10 Tips for Tackling Political Polarization in the Workplace and Beyond. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/10-tips-tackling-political-polarization-workplace-and-beyond8
• Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Ginn and Company.
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism9 in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Journal of Social Psychology, 33(3), 47-63.