
Is your prime saying they can’t award the PO until your CMMCstatus shows in SPRS? In this QT9 Q‑Cast episode, host Christian Reyes interviews Rhea Dancel (Senior Manager of Information Security at NSF, a C3PAO) to demystify CMMC compliance—who needs it, how Levels 1–3 map to NIST SP 800‑171/172, and exactly what assessors expect.
Guest: Rhea Dancel, NSF (C3PAO &certification body).Host: Christian Reyes, QT9.
Chapters 00:00 Why your PO is gated by SPRS + CMMC’s purpose01:06 Meet guest Rhia Dancel (NSF, C3PAO)01:42 Why CMMC replaced self‑attestation; 320 objectives03:03 Verified assessments vs. self‑assessments03:21 Levels 1–3 overview (FCI vs. CUI; NIST 800‑171/172)04:14 CMMC as both security framework and contract gate05:01 Who needs CMMC? Prime → sub flow‑down06:03 32 CFR program rule; 48 CFR clauses; rollout through Nov202807:04 FCI vs. CUI (plain‑English examples)08:30 COTS scope discussion09:10 Do SaaS vendors need CMMC? (depends on CUI & flow‑down)10:18 Scoping Level 2: SSP, network diagram, asset inventory10:54 C3PAO vs. consultant; mock assessments11:21 What counts as evidence; why technical proof wins12:09 Level 3 path (after Level 2 with C3PAO → DoD/DIBCAC)12:49 FedRAMP Moderate / equivalent for cloud CUI13:19 First 5 tasks to start (gap analysis → remediation → docs)14:36 Minimum viable evidence (SSP + network + inventory)15:21 When software vendors should pursue CMMC; scheduling realities17:26 Level 1 as a trust signal; annual affirmation18:40 How primes view vendors without CMMC in SPRS19:23 Level 2 timeline; enclaves; control inheritance22:16 Where to find NSF (Cyber AB Marketplace) & wrap‑up
DisclaimerThis episode shares general information—not legal advice. Always verifyrequirements in your specific solicitations and contracts.
If this helped, please like 👍,subscribe 🔔, and share with ateammate who owns security, contracts, or compliance.
Hashtags#CMMC #NIST800171 #NIST800172 #CUI #SPRS #FedRAMP #DefenseIndustrialBase #DIB#C3PAO #QT9QCast #NSF