The United States is entering one of its most volatile political moments in decades, defined by two high-profile acts of political violence: the July assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Both cases have ignited national debate, fueled distrust in institutions, and amplified concerns about political rhetoric ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The attempted assassination of Trump by 20-year-old Thomas Crooks remains clouded in controversy. Tucker Carlson alleges the FBI is concealing Crooks’ digital history — including violent threats, assassination fantasies, and ideological shifts — while the FBI asserts it conducted an exhaustive investigation involving thousands of interviews, digital forensics, and review of 25 social media accounts. The White House says Americans “deserve answers,” and a New York Post investigation claims Crooks had online activity across 17 accounts dating back five years. Senator Ron Johnson accuses the FBI of stonewalling.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk has magnified these tensions. Suspect Tyler Robinson faces deep public skepticism about whether he acted alone. Kirk’s security chief, Brian Harpole, publicly released messages showing he warned UVU police about rooftop vulnerabilities days before the shooting — warnings he says went unheeded. The speaker wonders whether the timing of these disclosures is organic or engineered to shift blame.
A new poll reveals 61% of Americans believe political rhetoric contributed to Kirk’s killing, with bipartisan agreement not seen since the Gabby Giffords shooting. The speaker expresses personal exhaustion, distrust of the FBI and CIA, and concern over possible AI-generated misinformation. With midterms approaching and threats against public figures rising, fear, confusion, and institutional distrust are reshaping civic life.
The speaker ultimately calls for stepping back from the noise, focusing on family, and awaiting clear information — while acknowledging the seriousness of the moment.
All content for The Rock of Talk is the property of Eddy Aragon and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The United States is entering one of its most volatile political moments in decades, defined by two high-profile acts of political violence: the July assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Both cases have ignited national debate, fueled distrust in institutions, and amplified concerns about political rhetoric ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The attempted assassination of Trump by 20-year-old Thomas Crooks remains clouded in controversy. Tucker Carlson alleges the FBI is concealing Crooks’ digital history — including violent threats, assassination fantasies, and ideological shifts — while the FBI asserts it conducted an exhaustive investigation involving thousands of interviews, digital forensics, and review of 25 social media accounts. The White House says Americans “deserve answers,” and a New York Post investigation claims Crooks had online activity across 17 accounts dating back five years. Senator Ron Johnson accuses the FBI of stonewalling.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk has magnified these tensions. Suspect Tyler Robinson faces deep public skepticism about whether he acted alone. Kirk’s security chief, Brian Harpole, publicly released messages showing he warned UVU police about rooftop vulnerabilities days before the shooting — warnings he says went unheeded. The speaker wonders whether the timing of these disclosures is organic or engineered to shift blame.
A new poll reveals 61% of Americans believe political rhetoric contributed to Kirk’s killing, with bipartisan agreement not seen since the Gabby Giffords shooting. The speaker expresses personal exhaustion, distrust of the FBI and CIA, and concern over possible AI-generated misinformation. With midterms approaching and threats against public figures rising, fear, confusion, and institutional distrust are reshaping civic life.
The speaker ultimately calls for stepping back from the noise, focusing on family, and awaiting clear information — while acknowledging the seriousness of the moment.
Albuquerque’s Mayoral Runoff: Cost, Conflict, and the Case for Reform
The Rock of Talk
8 minutes 2 seconds
1 week ago
Albuquerque’s Mayoral Runoff: Cost, Conflict, and the Case for Reform
Albuquerque is heading into a high-stakes December mayoral runoff after neither incumbent Tim Keller nor challenger Darren White secured the 50% majority required under the city charter. Keller led the first round with 36%, while White received 31%—meaning 64% of voters cast ballots against the incumbent, a clear sign of dissatisfaction despite his plurality lead. The 2013 charter amendment mandates a majority winner, forcing a runoff that now places both campaigns—and taxpayers—under new financial pressures.
The runoff is expected to cost the city nearly $2 million, and that figure does not include the additional public financing Keller qualified for under Albuquerque’s campaign rules. Keller has used public funding successfully in all three of his mayoral bids, including the upcoming runoff. When combined with the runoff’s operational costs, the total price tag for this election cycle approaches $3 million. White, who did not qualify for public funding, faces a significant financial disadvantage—one that Eddy argues could effectively determine the outcome before a single additional vote is cast.
This local contest also highlights broader problems in New Mexico’s election landscape. Due to constitutional changes in the early 2000s and the 2018 Local Election Act, municipalities can design their own systems, resulting in a fragmented “patchwork.” Some cities use plurality (Roswell), others use runoffs (Albuquerque, Rio Rancho, Gallup), and others use ranked-choice voting (RCV) (Santa Fe, Las Cruces). Rules around voter ID and campaign financing vary as well.
Although Eddy is not usually a supporter of RCV, he argues it would have produced a clearer reflection of voter sentiment in this election. Because 64% voted against Keller, an RCV system may have delivered a majority winner on election night, possibly Darren White. Supporters believe RCV ensures majority legitimacy and minimizes the impact of spoiler candidates, though critics cite its complexity and unpredictability.
The Rock of Talk
The United States is entering one of its most volatile political moments in decades, defined by two high-profile acts of political violence: the July assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Both cases have ignited national debate, fueled distrust in institutions, and amplified concerns about political rhetoric ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The attempted assassination of Trump by 20-year-old Thomas Crooks remains clouded in controversy. Tucker Carlson alleges the FBI is concealing Crooks’ digital history — including violent threats, assassination fantasies, and ideological shifts — while the FBI asserts it conducted an exhaustive investigation involving thousands of interviews, digital forensics, and review of 25 social media accounts. The White House says Americans “deserve answers,” and a New York Post investigation claims Crooks had online activity across 17 accounts dating back five years. Senator Ron Johnson accuses the FBI of stonewalling.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk has magnified these tensions. Suspect Tyler Robinson faces deep public skepticism about whether he acted alone. Kirk’s security chief, Brian Harpole, publicly released messages showing he warned UVU police about rooftop vulnerabilities days before the shooting — warnings he says went unheeded. The speaker wonders whether the timing of these disclosures is organic or engineered to shift blame.
A new poll reveals 61% of Americans believe political rhetoric contributed to Kirk’s killing, with bipartisan agreement not seen since the Gabby Giffords shooting. The speaker expresses personal exhaustion, distrust of the FBI and CIA, and concern over possible AI-generated misinformation. With midterms approaching and threats against public figures rising, fear, confusion, and institutional distrust are reshaping civic life.
The speaker ultimately calls for stepping back from the noise, focusing on family, and awaiting clear information — while acknowledging the seriousness of the moment.
