The United States is entering one of its most volatile political moments in decades, defined by two high-profile acts of political violence: the July assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Both cases have ignited national debate, fueled distrust in institutions, and amplified concerns about political rhetoric ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The attempted assassination of Trump by 20-year-old Thomas Crooks remains clouded in controversy. Tucker Carlson alleges the FBI is concealing Crooks’ digital history — including violent threats, assassination fantasies, and ideological shifts — while the FBI asserts it conducted an exhaustive investigation involving thousands of interviews, digital forensics, and review of 25 social media accounts. The White House says Americans “deserve answers,” and a New York Post investigation claims Crooks had online activity across 17 accounts dating back five years. Senator Ron Johnson accuses the FBI of stonewalling.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk has magnified these tensions. Suspect Tyler Robinson faces deep public skepticism about whether he acted alone. Kirk’s security chief, Brian Harpole, publicly released messages showing he warned UVU police about rooftop vulnerabilities days before the shooting — warnings he says went unheeded. The speaker wonders whether the timing of these disclosures is organic or engineered to shift blame.
A new poll reveals 61% of Americans believe political rhetoric contributed to Kirk’s killing, with bipartisan agreement not seen since the Gabby Giffords shooting. The speaker expresses personal exhaustion, distrust of the FBI and CIA, and concern over possible AI-generated misinformation. With midterms approaching and threats against public figures rising, fear, confusion, and institutional distrust are reshaping civic life.
The speaker ultimately calls for stepping back from the noise, focusing on family, and awaiting clear information — while acknowledging the seriousness of the moment.
All content for The Rock of Talk is the property of Eddy Aragon and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The United States is entering one of its most volatile political moments in decades, defined by two high-profile acts of political violence: the July assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Both cases have ignited national debate, fueled distrust in institutions, and amplified concerns about political rhetoric ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The attempted assassination of Trump by 20-year-old Thomas Crooks remains clouded in controversy. Tucker Carlson alleges the FBI is concealing Crooks’ digital history — including violent threats, assassination fantasies, and ideological shifts — while the FBI asserts it conducted an exhaustive investigation involving thousands of interviews, digital forensics, and review of 25 social media accounts. The White House says Americans “deserve answers,” and a New York Post investigation claims Crooks had online activity across 17 accounts dating back five years. Senator Ron Johnson accuses the FBI of stonewalling.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk has magnified these tensions. Suspect Tyler Robinson faces deep public skepticism about whether he acted alone. Kirk’s security chief, Brian Harpole, publicly released messages showing he warned UVU police about rooftop vulnerabilities days before the shooting — warnings he says went unheeded. The speaker wonders whether the timing of these disclosures is organic or engineered to shift blame.
A new poll reveals 61% of Americans believe political rhetoric contributed to Kirk’s killing, with bipartisan agreement not seen since the Gabby Giffords shooting. The speaker expresses personal exhaustion, distrust of the FBI and CIA, and concern over possible AI-generated misinformation. With midterms approaching and threats against public figures rising, fear, confusion, and institutional distrust are reshaping civic life.
The speaker ultimately calls for stepping back from the noise, focusing on family, and awaiting clear information — while acknowledging the seriousness of the moment.
The High Cost of Free Rides: What Albuquerque and Kansas City Teach New York About Fare-Free Transit
The Rock of Talk
10 minutes 15 seconds
3 weeks ago
The High Cost of Free Rides: What Albuquerque and Kansas City Teach New York About Fare-Free Transit
As New York City considers implementing a universal free bus system under incoming mayor Zoran Mamdani, cities like Albuquerque, Kansas City, and Portland provide cautionary evidence that “zero-fare” transit programs come with significant social, financial, and safety costs.
Albuquerque’s experience with free fares—initiated by Mayor Tim Keller during COVID-19 and extended indefinitely—has led to widespread public concern. Once envisioned as a tool for equity and mobility, the policy is now linked to increased homelessness, panhandling, and public safety issues along major corridors such as Central Avenue and Downtown. The city’s earlier ART (Albuquerque Rapid Transit) project under Mayor Richard Berry compounded these challenges, costing over $125 million while reducing roadway capacity and damaging local businesses. Combined with abandoned scooters and deteriorating infrastructure, the city’s transit system has become emblematic of failed urban mobility planning.
Kansas City’s “Zero-Fare Transit” program, launched in 2020 and later discontinued, mirrors these struggles. Bus operators there reported a sharp rise in assaults, intoxication, and unsanitary conditions—including public defecation and vandalism. Security costs soared as route cuts and losses mounted, prompting the city council to reinstate fares to restore order and accountability. Surveys of drivers overwhelmingly supported the return of paid fares as a means of improving safety and rider behavior.
For New York, Mamdani’s proposed fare-free system carries a projected annual price tag of $800 million—a cost comparable to large infrastructure projects. Critics, including the Amalgamated Transit Union, warn that it could attract crime, strain taxpayers, and divert funds from targeted programs like “Fair Fares” that assist low-income commuters. As past examples show, free transit may sound equitable but often undermines both fiscal sustainability and public safety—transforming buses into shelters and city corridors into unintended zones of disorder.
The Rock of Talk
The United States is entering one of its most volatile political moments in decades, defined by two high-profile acts of political violence: the July assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Both cases have ignited national debate, fueled distrust in institutions, and amplified concerns about political rhetoric ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The attempted assassination of Trump by 20-year-old Thomas Crooks remains clouded in controversy. Tucker Carlson alleges the FBI is concealing Crooks’ digital history — including violent threats, assassination fantasies, and ideological shifts — while the FBI asserts it conducted an exhaustive investigation involving thousands of interviews, digital forensics, and review of 25 social media accounts. The White House says Americans “deserve answers,” and a New York Post investigation claims Crooks had online activity across 17 accounts dating back five years. Senator Ron Johnson accuses the FBI of stonewalling.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk has magnified these tensions. Suspect Tyler Robinson faces deep public skepticism about whether he acted alone. Kirk’s security chief, Brian Harpole, publicly released messages showing he warned UVU police about rooftop vulnerabilities days before the shooting — warnings he says went unheeded. The speaker wonders whether the timing of these disclosures is organic or engineered to shift blame.
A new poll reveals 61% of Americans believe political rhetoric contributed to Kirk’s killing, with bipartisan agreement not seen since the Gabby Giffords shooting. The speaker expresses personal exhaustion, distrust of the FBI and CIA, and concern over possible AI-generated misinformation. With midterms approaching and threats against public figures rising, fear, confusion, and institutional distrust are reshaping civic life.
The speaker ultimately calls for stepping back from the noise, focusing on family, and awaiting clear information — while acknowledging the seriousness of the moment.
