The MAGA and MAHA alliance, not to mention the MAGA base, is in bad shape. Trump himself continues to do some amazing work, but he has moved from supporting the wrong things, mRNA, digital ID, privatized CBDCs, foreign food over American ranchers, and so on. Trump has always been MAGA and America First, but something really seems different and we need to talk about it. Why is he spending more time attacking MTG than Lindsey Graham? How is that MAGA? If Trump has ever had a weakness it is the people he surrounds himself with, and that is the best explanation I have at the moment. We know he picked people like Bill Barr and Mike Pence in the past, and my question is whether people like Susie Wiles and Pam Bondi are any better. If it is not them, then what is the problem, because things are not adding up. That is the heart of this discussion: not a personality fight, but a principle fight. Infighting At The Top, Not Just At The Bottom For years people on our side warned against “infighting” among influencers and grassroots activists. I agreed. I have always tried not to attack my own side. But what we are seeing now is not a few crank accounts going at each other in comment sections. We are watching the top of the movement start to fracture: Trump attacking Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) and Rep. Thomas Massie. MTG and others responding publicly about threats and rhetoric. Major pro-Trump influencers like Laura Loomer begging everyone to “stop the infighting” while at the same time taking hard lines on foreign policy fights. All of these people are, in different ways, MAGA. The question is not whether they are “in the club.” The question is what MAGA even means now. If the movement forgets its principles, the infighting is a symptom, not the disease. What Does It Mean To Be MAGA Or MAHA? I use “MAGA” for the political movement and “MAHA” for the medical-freedom, health-freedom alliance that rose up against COVID tyranny and Big Pharma. At its best, MAGA / MAHA meant: America First over globalist institutions Medical freedom and informed consent Opposition to forced digital control systems Real justice for corruption and child trafficking Protecting American workers and producers So let us ask some hard questions: Is mRNA MAGA or MAHA? Is digital ID MAGA? Are privatized CBDCs and tokenized control systems MAGA? Is bailing out foreign agriculture while American ranchers struggle MAGA? Is protecting the powerful from exposure in the Epstein network MAGA? Those are not side issues. For many of us, they are lines in the sand. Operation Warp Speed, mRNA, And The Swine Flu Lesson One of the clearest MAHA issues is mRNA. In 1976, the federal government rolled out a swine flu vaccination campaign. About 24 percent of Americans received the shot before the program was halted. Reports of Guillain–Barré syndrome and at least 25 associated deaths led officials to suspend the program after only a few months. Compare that to the COVID-19 mRNA rollout: Pfizer’s own post-authorization safety report (the famous “5.3.6” document, released via FOIA and litigation) recorded 1,223 reported deaths in the first three months after rollout for its vaccine worldwide, based on spontaneous reports to its pharmacovigilance system. Instead of pulling back, governments around the world expanded mandates, marketing, and pressure. Whatever you think about causation in any given case, the point is simple: Any other product with that kind of early safety signal would have been pulled or frozen. Yet mRNA shots were treated as untouchable. Many of us spent years in the trenches fighting mandates, hospital protocols, and censorship. To then watch a Trump aligned administration continue to praise Operation Warp Speed and keep mRNA on the shelves feels like a betrayal of what MAHA fought for. You cannot be a medical-freedom movement and pretend this does not matter. PREP Act Immunity And The Refusal To Reckon Wi