An anonymous source, ‘Whistling Mike,’ has asserted possession of a functional Tic-Tac power source, escalating debates over UAP data transparency and congressional oversight. The claim intersects with a renewed focus on historical crash retrieval documents, including the controversial SOM 1-01 manual, and coincides with a critical analysis of remote viewing protocols, which cautions against conflating speculation with verifiable psi data. These developments challenge the foundations of UAP secrecy, pushing for tangible evidence over managed narratives.