Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
TV & Film
Technology
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/c5/88/5f/c5885fcc-6c63-8630-cdb5-5e4077e977b5/mza_4945431322742059637.png/600x600bb.jpg
What You Will
Charlotte Ahlin and Danielle Cohn
38 episodes
1 week ago
Welcome back to the freshly Normanized England of King John! We go through the play's major characters and debate what type of animated Robin Hood animal they would be. (Except King John, who is OBVIOUSLY a pathetic little cuck lion without a mane and therefore needs no debate.)
Show more...
Performing Arts
Arts,
Comedy
RSS
All content for What You Will is the property of Charlotte Ahlin and Danielle Cohn and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Welcome back to the freshly Normanized England of King John! We go through the play's major characters and debate what type of animated Robin Hood animal they would be. (Except King John, who is OBVIOUSLY a pathetic little cuck lion without a mane and therefore needs no debate.)
Show more...
Performing Arts
Arts,
Comedy
https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/55838b70e4b069ce52d06d11/1542567892807-LVO71O5IU76YFUS3CMXN/What+You+Will+logo+official+size-01.png?format=1500w
Halloween Spooktacular (2025)
What You Will
1 month ago
Halloween Spooktacular (2025)
It's double, double podcast and trouble! In this year's Spooktacular, we discuss spooky Shakespearian Halloween costumes, rank the Bard's ghosts on a tier list, and build our ideal Shakespeare-themed haunted house.
What You Will
Welcome back to the freshly Normanized England of King John! We go through the play's major characters and debate what type of animated Robin Hood animal they would be. (Except King John, who is OBVIOUSLY a pathetic little cuck lion without a mane and therefore needs no debate.)