Join us as we explore the heated debate surrounding artificial intelligence in creative domains, addressing the "not fair" sentiment and anxieties about AI's "genuine creative spark". We'll demonstrate how these debates are not new, but echo historical disruptions like photography challenging painting, synthesizers redefining music, and digital art tools like Photoshop being criticised as "cheating". In each instance, technology forced a redefinition of artistic skill, shifting focus from manual execution to conceptualisation, curation, and the intelligent application of new instruments.

While AI excels at algorithmic ingenuity and rapid iteration, it lacks subjective experience, emotions, and consciousness – qualities central to the human "creative spark". This means AI output reflects patterns from existing works, risking aesthetic stagnation. The "not fair" sentiment is also driven by economic anxieties (job displacement) and copyright concerns, as AI often trains on copyrighted material and purely AI-generated work is generally not copyrightable under current U.S. law without human contribution.

The podcast argues that AI functions as a powerful tool that augments, rather than replaces, human creativity. The future of art will involve sophisticated human-AI partnerships where human judgment, curation, and the ability to imbue art with meaning remain paramount. The value of human art will increasingly lie in its authenticity, emotional depth, and the unique connection it fosters. This era demands new skillsets like "prompt engineering" and "AI artistry," reinforcing that artistic expertise adapts and evolves, but the human element remains irreplaceable for art that truly resonates.