Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
TV & Film
History
Technology
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/55/4f/9a/554f9aad-160e-adb7-311f-87d3fb4d7269/mza_7481912942923426576.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Condensed IP
Randy Noranbrock
66 episodes
4 days ago
This episode is about an Opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding a patent infringement case between Wonderland Switzerland AG and Evenflo Company, Inc. The central conflict involves Evenflo appealing a district court's judgment that its convertible car seats infringed upon two of Wonderland's patents, the '043 and '951 patents, which cover car seat technology. The Court of Appeals affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the c...
Show more...
Entrepreneurship
Business,
Management
RSS
All content for Condensed IP is the property of Randy Noranbrock and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
This episode is about an Opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding a patent infringement case between Wonderland Switzerland AG and Evenflo Company, Inc. The central conflict involves Evenflo appealing a district court's judgment that its convertible car seats infringed upon two of Wonderland's patents, the '043 and '951 patents, which cover car seat technology. The Court of Appeals affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the c...
Show more...
Entrepreneurship
Business,
Management
Episodes (20/66)
Condensed IP
Wonderland Switzerland AG v Evenflo Company (Fed. Cir., December 17, 2025) 2023-2043
This episode is about an Opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding a patent infringement case between Wonderland Switzerland AG and Evenflo Company, Inc. The central conflict involves Evenflo appealing a district court's judgment that its convertible car seats infringed upon two of Wonderland's patents, the '043 and '951 patents, which cover car seat technology. The Court of Appeals affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the c...
Show more...
4 days ago
10 minutes

Condensed IP
Game Plan v. Uninterrupted IP (Fed. Cir., December 10, 2025) 2024-1407
This episode concerns a United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opinion, dated December 10, 2025, concerning a trademark dispute between Game Plan, Inc., the appellant, and Uninterrupted IP, LLC (UNIP), the appellee. The core issue is an appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decision that canceled Game Plan's registration for its stylized mark, which includes the phrase "I AM MORE THAN AN ATHLETE." The Federal Circuit considered two main arguments from Game Pl...
Show more...
1 week ago
8 minutes

Condensed IP
In Re Bayou Grande Coffee Roasting (Fed. Cir., December 9, 2025) 2024-1118
This episode presents an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Bayou Grande Coffee Roasting Co. concerning the registration of the trademark KAHWA. The court reviewed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's decision, which had affirmed the examiner's refusal to register KAHWA for use in cafés and coffee shops. The initial refusals were based on arguments that KAHWA was generic or merely descriptive because it meant "coffee" in Arab...
Show more...
1 week ago
10 minutes

Condensed IP
IBM v. Zillow (Fed. Cir., December 9, 2025) 2024-1170
This episode covers an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding a patent dispute between International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), the appellant, and Zillow Group, Inc., and Zillow, Inc. (Zillow), the cross-appellants. The appeal and cross-appeal stem from a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) concerning the patentability of claims in IBM’s ’346 patent, which relates to single sign-on (SSO) operations. The court ultimately af...
Show more...
1 week ago
10 minutes

Condensed IP
Coda v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber (Fed. Cir., December 8, 2025) 2023-1880
This episode is about an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding the appeal in the case of Coda Development S.R.O. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, which revolves around claims of trade secret misappropriation and a denial for the correction of inventorship for a Goodyear patent related to self-inflating tire (SIT) technology. The plaintiffs, collectively referred to as "Coda," were appealing a district court's decision that granted Goodyear jud...
Show more...
1 week ago
9 minutes

Condensed IP
Adnexus v Meta Platforms (Fed. Circ., December 5, 2025) 2024-1551
This episode is about an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding the case of Adnexus Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc., which concerns a patent infringement lawsuit. Adnexus, the plaintiff-appellant, appealed the dismissal of its lawsuit against Meta for failure to state a claim, specifically focusing on whether Meta’s "Lead Ads" product infringed on a patent for an online advertising system. The core of the dispute revolves around the interpretation of th...
Show more...
2 weeks ago
10 minutes

Condensed IP
Seagen v Daiichi Sankyo (Fed. Cir., December 2, 2025) 2023-2424
This episode presents an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, resolving a patent dispute between Seagen Inc. and Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd. concerning an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) cancer treatment. Seagen had previously secured a jury verdict in the Eastern District of Texas finding that Daiichi's drug, Enhertu®, willfully infringed the ’039 patent and awarded Seagen over $41 million in damages. However, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court...
Show more...
2 weeks ago
12 minutes

Condensed IP
In Re Gesture Technology (Fed. Cir., December 1, 2025) 2025-1075
This episode is about an Opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in 2025, addressing an appeal by Gesture Technology Partners, LLC concerning the unpatentability of its ’431 patent. The case centered on an ex parte reexamination that proceeded despite the existence of two related inter partes reviews (IPRs) that had already found most claims invalid. Gesture challenged the Patent Office’s denial of its petition to terminate the review, arguing that IPR e...
Show more...
2 weeks ago
9 minutes

Condensed IP
EscapeX v. Google (Fed. Cir., November 25, 2025) 2024-1201
This episode concerns an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressing the appeal filed by EscapeX IP, LLC against a series of sanction rulings granted in favor of Google LLC. The court affirmed the district court’s determination that the patent infringement case against Google was "exceptional" under 35 U.S.C. § 285, largely because EscapeX failed to conduct an adequate pre-suit investigation and proceeded with frivolous claims even after being repeatedly...
Show more...
3 weeks ago
9 minutes

Condensed IP
Akamai Technologies v. Mediapointe, Inc., AMHC, Inc. (Fed. Cir., November 25, 2025) 2024-1571
This episode presents an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a patent dispute involving Akamai Technologies, Inc. and MediaPointe, Inc. The appeal centered on patents describing an "intelligent distribution network" for streaming media, with the appellate court affirming the lower court’s final judgment on all contested issues. The court upheld the invalidity of multiple claims containing terms like "optimal" or "best" because the specification lacked th...
Show more...
3 weeks ago
9 minutes

Condensed IP
Duke University v. Sandoz Inc. (Fed. Cir., November 18, 2025) 2024-1078
This episode regards an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case of Duke University v. Sandoz Inc., decided on November 18, 2025. The core issue is an appeal from Sandoz regarding a lower court's judgment that upheld the validity of claim 30 of U.S Patent No. 9,579,270, which relates to using specific prostaglandin F analogs for treating hair loss. Duke University and Allergan Sales, LLC, the owners of the patent, had previously won a jury trial find...
Show more...
1 month ago
8 minutes

Condensed IP
Smartrend v. Opti-Luxx Patent Appeals (Fed. Cir., November 13, 2025) 2024-1616
This episode covers an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding a patent infringement case between Smartrend Manufacturing Group (SMG), Inc., and Opti-Luxx Inc. This judicial decision addresses two separate patents related to illuminated school bus signs, a design patent (D930) and a utility patent (’491). For the D930 patent, the appellate court vacates the infringement judgment and orders a new trial because the lower court incorrectly construed the ...
Show more...
1 month ago
7 minutes

Condensed IP
Canatex Completion Solutions v. Wellmatics (Fed. Cir., November 12, 2025) 2024-1466
This episode is about an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case of Canatex Completion Solutions, Inc. v. Wellmatics, LLC, decided on November 12, 2025. The core issue of the appeal is whether the U.S. Patent No. 10,794,122, owned by Canatex, is invalid for indefiniteness due to an alleged clerical error in the claims. Specifically, the patent uses the phrase “the connection profile of the second part,” which Canatex argued should be corrected to “f...
Show more...
1 month ago
11 minutes

Condensed IP
In Re Motorola Solutions, Inc (Fed. Cir., November 6, 2025) 2025-134
This episode is about a judicial order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dated November 6, 2025, concerning the case In Re MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. The court addresses Motorola Solutions' Petition for Writ of Mandamus against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) following the PTO's de-institution of several inter partes reviews (IPRs) involving patents held by Stellar, LLC. The core of the dispute involves the Acting Director's rescission of prior ...
Show more...
1 month ago
10 minutes

Condensed IP
Merck Serono v. Hopewell Pharma (Fed. Cir., October 30, 2025) 2025-1210
This episode regards a United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opinion, dated October 30, 2025, concerning a patent dispute between Merck Serono S.A. and Hopewell Pharma Ventures, Inc. The case involves Merck's appeal of two consolidated inter partes reviews (IPRs) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board), which had found certain claims of two Merck patents related to an oral cladribine regimen for treating multiple sclerosis (MS) unpatentable as obvious. The primary le...
Show more...
1 month ago
11 minutes

Condensed IP
Aortic Innovations v. Edwards Lifesciences (Fed. Cir., October 27, 2025) 2024-1145
This episode relates to a United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opinion regarding a patent infringement case, Aortic Innovations LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation decided October 27, 2025. The core dispute involves the correct claim construction of the term "outer frame" in patents concerning transcatheter aortic valve replacement devices. The Plaintiff-Appellant, Aortic Innovations, appealed a stipulated judgment of non-infringement, which was based on the District Cou...
Show more...
1 month ago
11 minutes

Condensed IP
Centripetal Networks v. Palo Alto Networks (Fed. Cir., October 22, 2025) 2023-2027
This episode concerns a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al., decided on October 22, 2025. The core of the case involves Centripetal Networks appealing a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that held certain claims of their patent unpatentable as obvious. A significant issue addressed is Centripetal’s claim that the PTAB’s decision was "tainted" due to the belated recusa...
Show more...
1 month ago
12 minutes

Condensed IP
Barrette Outdoor Living v. Fortress Iron (Fed. Cir., October 17, 2025) 2024-1231
This episode focuses on an opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, concerning a patent infringement case between Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc. (Plaintiff-Appellant) and Fortress Iron, LP, et al. (Defendants-Cross-Appellants). Barrette appealed a lower court's finding of non-infringement related to four of its patents, while Fortress cross-appealed the finding that the claims were not indefinite. The central issue on appeal revolved around the construction of ter...
Show more...
2 months ago
10 minutes

Condensed IP
Causam v. ecobee (Fed. Cir., October 15, 2025) 2024-1958
This episode concerns the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's opinion in the case of Causam Enterprises, Inc. v. ecobee Technologies ULC, decided on October 15, 2025. The core issue is an appeal from a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board), which had ruled that several claims of Causam's U.S. Patent No. 10,394,268 were unpatentable due to obviousness following an inter partes review (IPR) initiated by ecobee. The court addresses two main arguments raised b...
Show more...
2 months ago
12 minutes

Condensed IP
Causam v. ITC (Fed. Cir., October 15, 2025) 2023-1769
This episode details an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding an appeal in the case of Causam Enterprises, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (ITC). The core issue originated from Causam's complaint to the ITC alleging that various companies, including Resideo Smart Homes Technology and ecobee Technologies ULC, were violating a section of the Tariff Act by importing and selling "smart" thermostats that infringed upon Causam's '268 patent related...
Show more...
2 months ago
10 minutes

Condensed IP
This episode is about an Opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding a patent infringement case between Wonderland Switzerland AG and Evenflo Company, Inc. The central conflict involves Evenflo appealing a district court's judgment that its convertible car seats infringed upon two of Wonderland's patents, the '043 and '951 patents, which cover car seat technology. The Court of Appeals affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the c...