Raimundo, A., Ferreira-Pereira, L. C., & Jokela, J. (2025). Small European states and Brexit: comparing the coping strategies of Portugal and Finland. International Politics, 62(3), 634–652. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00608-2

This article compares how Portugal and Finland, two small and peripheral yet core EU member states, strategically responded to Brexit. Both countries relied on EU sheltering—aligning with EU institutions and key member states—to mitigate external shocks. However, they also pursued hedging strategies in domains where Brexit created specific vulnerabilities. For Portugal, hedging was strongest in foreign and security policy, as it sought to counterbalance a potentially less Atlantic-oriented EU by strengthening bilateral ties with the UK and the transatlantic alliance beyond the EU framework. In contrast, Finland’s hedging was most visible in the political economy domain, where the loss of the UK as a liberal ally pushed Finland to form new coalitions, such as the New Hanseatic League, to safeguard economic interests. Ultimately, the study shows that coping strategies depend on each state’s exposure to Brexit, the institutional context of the policy area, and their commitment to EU integration.