Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
TV & Film
Technology
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/1f/b0/cf/1fb0cf06-1f77-677c-50c6-275b38dd445d/mza_16781166238813276942.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Free Speech Press
IG: gerardozurvan
83 episodes
5 days ago
I upload United States Supreme Court Oral Arguments so that the average American can listen on their smartphone. I do not modify the audios. Each episode is identical to the MP3 file provided at supremecourt.gov. This podcast has no affiliation with the Supreme Court of the United States.
Show more...
Government
RSS
All content for Free Speech Press is the property of IG: gerardozurvan and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
I upload United States Supreme Court Oral Arguments so that the average American can listen on their smartphone. I do not modify the audios. Each episode is identical to the MP3 file provided at supremecourt.gov. This podcast has no affiliation with the Supreme Court of the United States.
Show more...
Government
https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/42183946/42183946-1728416841022-8b9c4708354af.jpg
Landor v. LA DOC (2025)
Free Speech Press
1 hour 50 minutes 48 seconds
2 weeks ago
Landor v. LA DOC (2025)

Docket Number: 23-1197
Date Argued: 11/10/25

23-1197 LANDOR V. LA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

DECISION BELOW: 82 F.4th 337

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 22-30686

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Congress has enacted two "sister" statutes to protect religious exercise: the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq ., and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. 2000cc et seq . In Tanzin v. Tanvir , 592 U.S. 43 (2020), this Court held that an individual may sue a government official in his individual capacity for damages for violations of RFRA. RLUIPA's relevant language is identical.

The question presented is whether an individual may sue a government official in his individual capacity for damages for violations of RLUIPA.

CERT. GRANTED 6/23/2025



https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/23-1197_3d9g.pdf

Free Speech Press
I upload United States Supreme Court Oral Arguments so that the average American can listen on their smartphone. I do not modify the audios. Each episode is identical to the MP3 file provided at supremecourt.gov. This podcast has no affiliation with the Supreme Court of the United States.