Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The GvHD Hub held a virtual symposium on October 21, 2025, titled, Guidance vs practice: How can we improve treatment of SR-GvHD? Here, we share a presentation by Daniel Wolff, University Hospital Regensburg, DE, discussing the early treatment strategies for SR-GvHD.
Wolff provided an overview of the treatment options for second-line treatment after steroids and subsequent advanced-line options, emphasizing that early detection of disease progression and sufficient treatment intervention are crucial, as advanced disease is often nonreversible. Wolff discussed response assessments to first-line steroid treatment and second-line treatments, and outlined the treatment options for patients with SR-cGvHD, including ruxolitinib, belumosudil, axatilimab, ibrutinib, and extracorporeal photopheresis.
This educational resource is independently supported by Sanofi.
All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The GvHD Hub held a virtual symposium on October 21, 2025, titled, Guidance vs practice: How can we improve treatment of SR-GvHD. Here, we share a presentation by Steven Pavletic, Bethesda, US, discussing quality of life and symptoms in cGvHD.
Pavletic discussed the importance of the assessment of quality of life using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in both clinical trials and clinical practice in cGvHD, outlining the frequently used PROMs in GvHD, including cGvHD-specific and dimension-specific measures. Pavletic highlighted that incorporation of PROMs into standard of care practice may ultimately lead to more tailored and effective clinical assessments.
This educational resource is independently supported by Sanofi. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The GvHD Hub was pleased to speak with Mohamad Mohty. We asked, What are the treatment options for ruxolitinib-refractory acute GvHD?
In this interview, Mohamad Mohty discusses the evolving management of steroid-refractory acute GvHD, highlighting ruxolitinib as the standard of care and the importance of robust supportive measures. Mohty explores treatment options for ruxolitinib-refractory disease – including extracorporeal photopheresis, mesenchymal stromal cells, and emerging targeted approaches. Mohty highlights the value of referral to specialized centers and clinical trial enrolment as treatment shifts toward precision-guided, biology-driven strategies.
This educational resource is independently supported by Medac. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The GvHD Hub held a virtual symposium on October 21, 2025, titled, Guidance vs practice: How can we improve treatment of SR-GvHD? Here, we share a presentation by Mohamad Mohty, Sorbonne University Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, FR, discussing the importance of real-world data (RWD) in allogeneic stem cell transplantation with a focus on cGvHD.
Mohty provided an overview of RWD, including their use in regulatory decision-making, types of RWD, study designs, and limitations. Mohty explored whether results of pivotal clinical trial results can be reproduced with RWD, highlighting the consistent outcomes observed in a French compassionate use program of belumosudil.
This educational resource is independently supported by Sanofi.
All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The GvHD Hub was pleased to speak with Robert Zeiser. We asked, What are the current treatment options for steroid-refractory chronic GvHD (SR-cGvHD)?
In this interview, Zeiser explores the current treatment options for SR-cGvHD, such as ruxolitinib, ibrutinib, belumosudil, and axatilimab, and discusses the different mechanisms of action involved in targeting distinct pathways involved in cGvHD pathogenesis. Zeiser notes that future directions may focus on identifying optimal combination therapies for patients with SR-cGvHD.
This educational resource is independently supported by Sanofi. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Despite advances in preventing chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), transplant recipients continue to be affected, with steroid-refractoriness associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality.1
The GvHD Hub spoke with Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, US. We asked, What are the major challenges in the treatment of steroid-refractory GvHD (SR-GvHD), and how can clinicians overcome these?
This educational resource is independently supported by Sanofi. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
During the GvHD Hub Steering Committee Meeting on May 12, 2025, key opinion leaders met to discuss how to improve measurement of quality of life (QoL) and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cGvHD. The discussion was preceded by a presentation by Mohamad Mohty, and the discussion featured Nico Gagelmann, Bipin Savani, Ali Bazarbachi, Corey Cutler, and Andrew Harris.
Mohty began by explaining the necessity of measuring QoL in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and the current use of PROs in trials and clinical practice. During the discussion, the steering committee members provided insight into the difficulties implementing QoL assessment in clinical practice, and potential solutions.
This independent educational activity is supported by Sanofi. All content was developed independently. The funder was allowed no influence on the content of this activity.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
During the GvHD Hub Steering Committee Meeting on May 12, 2025, key opinion leaders met to discuss the use of extracorporeal photopheresis + ruxolitinib to prevent cGvHD in patients with SRaGvHD. The discussion was preceded by a presentation by Nico Gagelmann, chaired by Mohamad Mohty, and featured Robert Zeiser, Bipin Savani, Daniel Wolff, Corey Cutler, and Andrew Harris.
Gagelmann began by presenting the design and rationale of a real-world retrospective study in Germany, response and survival outcomes, and key takeaways. During the discussion, the steering committee members provided their thoughts on the use of combination therapies, specifically ECP + ruxolitinib, in SR-GvHD, and potential directions for future studies.
This independent educational activity was supported by Therakos. All content was developed independently. The funder was allowed no influence on the content of this activity.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Real-world evidence (RWE) and randomized controlled trial (RCT) data each have both advantages and disadvantages, and they can be complementary. In general, outcomes of real-world studies are given lower credibility compared with RCT research, which is characterized as having the highest reliability. However, real-world studies can be particularly advantageous in specific patient populations, for instance in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), which may have a lack of RCT data.
The GvHD Hub spoke to Steven Pavletic, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, US, about his perspectives on how RWE can complement RCTs, and why it may be important for small patient populations.
RCT vs RWE
Ideally, RCTs and real-world studies should be developed to be complementary. For example, if an RCT investigates the efficacy of a drug, the real-world studies can focus on the epidemiology, effectiveness, safety, or costs of treatment related to that drug.
Real-world data in cGvHD
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
This educational resource is independently supported by Medac. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee; funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential therapy option in patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GvHD).1 MSCs do not express human leukocyte antigen class II and can therefore be administered without the need for matching, giving them a distinct advantage over other cellular therapies.
The GvHD Hub spoke to Robert Zeiser, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Freiburg, DE, about his key insights into MSCs for aGvHD, and the current clinical trial landscape.
The MSC clinical trial landscape
Recent developments
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The GvHD Hub was pleased to speak to Andrew Gennery, Newcastle University and Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, and Chair of the UK Photopheresis Society, about the future directions of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD).
View on the GvHD Hub here: https://gvhdhub.com/medical-information/future-perspectives-of-ecp-for-gvhd-treatment
Gennery begins by providing a background to using ECP in pediatric patients, including the potential complications involved and how to mitigate these. He then discusses the process of ECP, including treatment scheduling, and its efficacy in different types of GvHD.
Gennery goes on to speak about how the treatment landscape for GvHD has changed in the last 5 years, how it might change in the future, and where ECP fits in as an immunomodulatory agent. In the future, ECP may be combined with the newer immunosuppressive agents that are approved, or in development, for the treatment of GvHD to deliver positive outcomes for patients.
This independent educational activity was supported by Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. All content was developed independently by the faculty. The funder was allowed no influence on the content of this activity.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
On April 14, 2024, the GvHD Hub held a symposium at the 50th European Society for Bone and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Annual Meeting on the role of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in the management of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD).
Zinaida Perić, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, HR, shared her thoughts on patient eligibility, treatment optimization, and follow-up after treatment with ECP for cGvHD. She also discussed a case report of a patient with steroid-refractory (SR)-cGvHD, plus retrospective and prospective data on the use of ECP in cGvHD. In addition, she shared the Nordic ECP Quality Group treatment guidelines for SR-cGvHD.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
On April 14, 2024, the GvHD Hub held a symposium at the 50th European Society for Bone and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Annual Meeting on the role of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in the management of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD).
Here, we share the presentation by Florent Malard, Hôpital Saint-Antoine and Sorbonne Université, Paris, FR, that explored early intervention and ECP-based combinations. Mallard covered use of ECP first-line, as well as ECP combinations in patients with steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent cGvHD, including recent approvals and findings from clinical trials.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
On April 14, 2024, the GvHD Hub held a symposium at the 50th European Society for Bone and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Annual Meeting on the role of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in the management of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD).
Here, we share the presentation by Bipin Savani, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, US, which explored the long-term burden of cGvHD. Savani discussed organs frequently affected by cGvHD, comorbidities and mortality in patients with cGvHD, and recent progress made in improving the safety of transplantation. He highlighted that mental health disorders, such as anxiety and depression, are prevalent in patients with cGvHD and that the physical burden of symptomscontributes to limitation of daily activities in these patients.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
On April 14, 2024, the GvHD Hub held a symposium at the 50th European Society for Bone and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Annual Meeting on the role of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in the management of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD).
Here, we share the presentation by Mohamad Mohty, Hôpital Saint-Antoine and Sorbonne Université, Paris, FR, which explored a brief history of ECP, outlined the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and ECP procedures, and also included two cGvHD patient case studies.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
During the GvHD Hub Steering Committee meeting in November 2022, key opinion leaders met to discuss what supportive care should look like for patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The recorded discussion was chaired by Professor Amin Alousi (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, US) and featured Mutlu Arat (Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, TR), Ali Bazarbachi (American University of Beirut, Beirut, LB), Hildegard Greinix (Medical University of Graz, Graz, AT), and Attilio Olivieri (Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, IT).
Professor Alousi opens by highlighting the importance of supportive care in GvHD and the challenges in ensuring this is delivered effectively. This discussion focusses on the side effects and adverse events associated with GvHD treatments, including those that may have a negative impact on a patient’s quality of life.
The steering committee members discuss the need for a multidisciplinary approach to GvHD treatment through communication with other healthcare professionals (HCPs). For example, mental health professionals, pharmacists, and ophthalmologists may all be involved in the treatment of a patient with GvHD depending on the manifestation of the disease. The discussion concludes that cross-functional collaboration of HCPs may have a positive impact on quality of life and requires further research.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
During the 2022 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings of ASTCT and CIBMTR (Tandem Meetings), the GvHD Hub was pleased to speak to Gérard Socié, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, FR. We asked, How would you treat acute GvHD (aGvHD) in your clinic (an EU perspective)?
Socié begins by highlighting the main differences between aGvHD treatment in the EU and in the US. Socié then discusses the use of steroids in aGvHD treatment, despite 40–50% of patients becoming steroid-resistant. Finally, Socié talks about the current standard of care in steroid-resistant aGvHD.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
During the 48th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), the GvHD Hub was pleased to speak to Zinaida Perić, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, HR, and Bipin Savani, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, US. We asked, What should supportive care look like for patients with GvHD? What role does physical activity play in these patients?
Savani begins by highlighting the importance of supportive care for patients with GvHD. Perić then discusses how, if local therapy is effective enough, systemic treatment can be avoided, and how there should always be an aim to use the least immunosuppression possible. Savani goes on to talk about pain and fatigue management in these patients and how physical therapy could play a role. Finally, both Perić and Savani emphasize that supportive care should be a priority, and more data on the use of physical exercise and therapy is key to improving the quality of life for patients with GvHD.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
During the 48th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), the GvHD Hub was pleased to speak to Daniel Weisdorf, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, US. We asked, How do we stratify risk in patients with GvHD?
Weisdorf begins by discussing the Minnesota Risk Score (M. MacMillan, et al.), which uses the stage of skin, liver, and gut involvement in GvHD to predict the response to therapy. Weisdorf then talks about the potential of incorporating biomarkers into the Minnesota Risk Score in the future.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
During the 63rd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, the GvHD Hub was pleased to speak to steering committee member Mohamad Mohty, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, FR. We asked, What's the latest in treatment of steroid-refractory acute GvHD at ASH 2021?
In this podcast, Mohty highlights the latest advances in the field of steroid-refractory acute GvHD and emphasizes the importance of prevention, commenting on anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT), and posttransplant cyclophosphamide. Mohty also mentions the HERACLES trial (NCT03225937) and the use of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.