Threat informed defense means using knowledge about real attacks to guide security work, so defensive choices stay connected to how adversaries actually behave in the world. For a beginner, this idea matters because it turns cybersecurity from a pile of disconnected tools into a story about attackers, their steps, and the ways defenders can interrupt those steps. In threat informed defense, the starting point is not a catalog of products or buzzwords, but a simple description of how someone might break into a system, move around, and reach something valuable. That description becomes a map that shows which defenses should exist, where they should sit, and which events defenders must notice quickly when something suspicious happens. Thinking this way keeps learning grounded in real attacker behavior instead of abstract checklists and slogans, which helps every new concept feel like another piece of the same overall picture. This episode uses that map based thinking to connect several popular models so a new learner sees how they support threat informed defense together.

Alert triage is the first pass an analyst makes on incoming security alerts. In those first few minutes, the analyst decides whether something needs fast action or patient investigation. The goal is not to solve every detail immediately, but to understand whether the situation is dangerous, harmless, or still unclear. For beginners, this moment can feel stressful because alarms sound serious and tools use unfamiliar language. A simple, repeatable mental checklist helps replace panic with calm, steady thinking and clear steps. In this episode, we walk slowly through those first minutes after a new alert appears on the screen. We focus on a single example, a suspicious login from a country the user has never visited before. Using that small story, we look at which details matter most and why they matter. You will hear how analysts confirm basic facts, pull more context, and weigh possible risks. By the end, you can picture a straightforward triage flow that you can practice and adapt later.

Logs are the raw notes that help turn messy digital activity into clear security stories. Every website, device, and application constantly writes these notes in the background, even when people barely notice them. Security teams use logs to understand what really happened when something breaks or looks suspicious, instead of guessing based on incomplete memories or vague reports. A single log entry is like one sentence, recording who did something, what they did, when they did it, and how it turned out. Many entries together form events and alerts that highlight important patterns worth human attention. When beginners learn to read logs, they gain a powerful way to see behind the user interface and watch systems actually behaving. That skill lets them move from vague worries toward evidence based understanding of risk. Step by step, raw data becomes a readable security story.

Security controls are the many small and large actions, tools, and rules that organizations use to keep information, systems, and people safe from harm. When someone installs a lock, sets up a password, turns on monitoring, or writes a policy, they are putting a control in place to shape what can happen and how problems are handled. At first, the idea of controls can feel abstract because the word appears often in cybersecurity discussions without much explanation or context for beginners. A simple way to make controls easier to understand is to recognize that each one has a job, such as stopping trouble, spotting trouble, or fixing damage after trouble occurs. In this episode, the focus stays on those jobs, not on fancy product names or complex technical diagrams that can distract from the basics. By the end, you will be able to look at common protections and clearly describe which type of control they represent.

Defense in depth is a simple idea that quietly shapes strong cybersecurity for real organizations. Instead of trusting one perfect barrier, defense in depth stacks several ordinary protections so mistakes stay small. A beginner might hear about firewalls, antivirus, passwords, and backups as separate topics, without seeing how they support each other. The defense in depth mindset connects these pieces into layers that catch problems at different points in an attack. This idea matters because even the best tool will miss something eventually, and people will always make occasional mistakes. When multiple layers exist, one missed click or misconfigured setting becomes a minor incident, not a complete disaster. A small community fundraiser website, a campus bookstore, or a medical clinic can all benefit from this layered way of thinking. They rarely have huge security teams, yet layers let them survive common attacks with much less drama. Learning defense in depth early helps beginners understand tools as cooperating teammates, not magical products that somehow fix everything alone. This episode explores those teammates one by one and shows how they share the work of protecting real systems.

Network segmentation sounds like a complex expert topic, but it starts very simply. If you understand that computers send messages over shared roads, segmentation shapes those roads. Earlier episodes described basic networks and architectures, the maps connecting devices and services together. This episode builds on that foundation and zooms in on how traffic is separated. Segmentation is the practice of breaking one big network into smaller, safer neighborhoods. Each neighborhood has its own rules, doors, and guards, controlling who may visit inside. For beginners, segmentation explains why office computers, guest Wi-Fi, and production servers should never mingle freely. It also explains why attackers love flat networks, where everything can reach everything else easily. Understanding segmentation gives you a mental picture for containing damage and guiding sensible security decisions. We will use a simple office story to make these ideas concrete and easy to remember.

Welcome to our exploration of why you cannot secure what you cannot see in cybersecurity. This episode focuses on asset inventory, the simple idea of knowing exactly what technology you depend on every day. Before anything else, you need to understand what security professionals mean when they say the word assets. In security, assets are anything valuable that supports how a business works, including laptops, servers, cloud accounts, and important data. When those assets are visible and counted, it becomes much easier to protect them in a deliberate way. When they are invisible or forgotten, they turn into quiet openings that attackers can discover before defenders even know something exists. Beginners often jump straight into tools, alerts, or headlines without first building this basic map of their environment. Without that map, every later security effort rests on a shaky foundation that can surprise people. In this episode, you will learn how different kinds of assets fit together as one picture. You will also see why even small gaps in that picture can make logging, patching, and incident response much less effective.

Patch and update management is where earlier vulnerability concepts finally turn into concrete daily security actions. When you scan for weaknesses or read about new flaws, the story only becomes real when something actually changes on your systems. A patch is a small piece of software code that fixes a known flaw in an existing product, closing a door an attacker could use. An update is a broader bundle of improvements, which might include security fixes, stability improvements, or minor features. An upgrade is usually a bigger jump, such as moving to a new major version that changes behavior more significantly. For a beginner, these words can blur together, which makes planning and communication very confusing and stressful. This episode slowly connects those terms to simple everyday tasks like installing phone updates or restarting a point-of-sale terminal. By the end, patching should feel like an organized habit instead of a mysterious, chaotic fire drill.

Vulnerabilities sit at the center of almost every cybersecurity story people read about today. A vulnerability is a weakness in hardware, software, or a process that an attacker can misuse to cause harm. When organizations understand their vulnerabilities clearly, they can fix the most dangerous ones before someone takes advantage of them in the real world. When they do not understand them, small weaknesses quietly build up until one incident becomes unavoidable and very costly. This episode brings together three ideas that appear in nearly every security advisory, which are vulnerabilities, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (C V E), and the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (C V S S). By the end, a beginner should feel comfortable reading basic alerts, understanding the numbers, and holding a focused conversation about risk. The goal is simple, which is turning confusing identifiers and scores into a practical guide for everyday prioritization.

Threat modeling is a structured way to think about how systems might be attacked before any real harm occurs. Instead of picturing hacking as mysterious magic, threat modeling turns it into a calm, methodical review of what could go wrong and how serious each problem might be. For beginners, it provides a guided path to notice important details that usually hide in plain sight, like how data moves or where passwords are typed. The goal is not to scare anyone but to build steady confidence in understanding systems more clearly. In this episode, the focus stays on simple situations such as a small website or home network that feel familiar and concrete. You will see how to name what matters, how an attacker might approach it, and what damage could follow. The mindset is curious, not paranoid, and always focused on systems rather than people. Thinking like an attacker safely means asking structured what if scenarios and then writing them down clearly. By the end, threat modeling will feel like an everyday thinking tool rather than an advanced specialty.

Cyber attacks rarely happen as single isolated moments; they usually unfold in connected stages over time. When headlines talk about a breach, they often focus on the final impact, such as stolen data or encrypted files, and they skip the many earlier steps that made that result possible. A beginner who only sees the ending can feel confused, surprised, and powerless to respond effectively. An attack lifecycle view changes that feeling by breaking the event into understandable pieces, each with its own purpose and warning signs. Instead of thinking about a mysterious hacker pressing one magic button, the learner sees a chain of actions that must succeed in order. That chain can be studied, described, and interrupted in multiple places with simple controls. Seeing attacks as lifecycles is the starting point for using the Cyber Kill Chain and the MITRE ATTACK framework effectively.

Many people first meeting cybersecurity feel lost in a storm of disconnected tools, rules, and scary headlines about breaches. Without a shared map of attacker behavior, every new term or alert can feel random and hard to compare meaningfully. The MITER ATTACK matrix gives that shared map by organizing real attacker behaviors into a picture that people across roles can read together. In this episode we stay with the beginner viewpoint and slowly unpack what that matrix actually is in very simple language. You will hear how the columns and cells of the matrix describe attacker goals and concrete moves rather than magic or mystery. We will separate tactics, which are high level goals, from techniques, which are specific methods, so the pattern becomes easier to recognize. Along the way we walk through one or two short attack stories and keep tying each step back to the matrix layout. Then we show how defenders on blue teams, ethical hackers on red teams, and nontechnical managers all use this same picture differently. By the end, the wall of boxes feels less like an exam cheat sheet and more like a useful everyday reference for understanding threats. The goal is simple, because you finish feeling able to open the ATT&CK matrix and describe what you are seeing with real confidence.

The Cyber Insights podcast breaks down NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 in plain English so first-time learners and busy leaders can act with confidence. In this episode, we translate the big shifts—especially the new Govern function—into everyday decisions: who owns risk, how to map what the business relies on, and how to turn outcomes into habits people actually follow. You’ll hear clear examples across Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover, with practical language you can reuse in plans, policies, and board updates.

Expect a calm, no-hype walkthrough designed for audio: simple definitions, concrete scenarios, and takeaways you can apply this week. Tuesdays are for Cyber Insights & Education at Bare Metal Cyber, and this episode keeps that promise—short, useful, and focused on results. Developed and produced by BareMetalCyber.com.

The capstone week brings together all prior concepts, emphasizing integration as the defining quality of resilient design. Students learn that resilience arises not from isolated tools but from coherent architectures that link cryptography, identity, networks, applications, and supply chains into a unified strategy. Frameworks such as NIST CSF, ISO 27001, FAIR, and OWASP are revisited as guides for aligning technical measures with organizational priorities.

Case studies contrast failures of design—flat networks, poor identity controls—with examples of resilient architectures that contained damage and supported rapid recovery. Governance, communication, and humility are emphasized as traits of effective leadership. Learners finish the course prepared to explain trade-offs, design layered defenses, and lead with adaptability. The ultimate outcome of secure design is trust—confidence that systems will function reliably even under attack.
 Produced by BareMetalCyber.com

This week addresses the rapidly evolving threat landscape. Ransomware is studied from its early origins to its present role as a multimillion-dollar business model, while advanced persistent threats demonstrate the persistence and adaptability of state-sponsored actors. Insider threats add complexity, highlighting the difficulty of defending against misuse of legitimate credentials. Frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK, STRIDE, and DREAD provide structured ways to map adversary behavior and anticipate weaknesses.

Students examine case studies including ransomware attacks on healthcare and the SolarWinds compromise, illustrating the systemic and human consequences of modern campaigns. Defensive strategies such as zero trust, microsegmentation, threat hunting, and layered defense are explored, alongside the challenges of cost and complexity. By the end of the week, learners will recognize that adaptability is the defining characteristic of resilience, requiring continuous monitoring, cultural change, and leadership commitment.
 Produced by BareMetalCyber.com

Applications and APIs form the backbone of digital services, enabling everything from online banking to global supply chains. Students study common weaknesses cataloged in the OWASP Top 10, including injection, misconfiguration, and weak session management, as well as the specific risks of mobile and API security. Case studies of T-Mobile and Peloton highlight how weak APIs expose sensitive data, while the persistence of SQL injection shows that technical knowledge alone is not enough—cultural and organizational discipline are required.

Attention is also given to testing methodologies such as static, dynamic, and interactive analysis, as well as runtime protections. Learners explore the secure software development lifecycle, where security is embedded from design through deployment. By the end of this week, students will appreciate that application security is both technical and cultural, demanding governance, training, and communication alongside tools and frameworks.
 Produced by BareMetalCyber.com

Modern infrastructure has evolved from physical servers to cloud-native platforms, redefining both opportunities and risks. Students explore Infrastructure as Code, continuous integration and delivery, and the challenges of configuration drift. Case studies of pipeline compromises show how trusted automation can be weaponized, with vulnerabilities propagating across environments at unprecedented speed. The rise of the software supply chain as a critical risk vector, highlighted by SolarWinds, Log4j, and the XZ backdoor, demonstrates the systemic nature of modern threats.

Students examine supply chain visibility through tools such as Software Bills of Materials, as well as verification practices like digital signatures and reproducible builds. Frameworks including NIST SP 800-204D and OWASP pipeline guidance are introduced to provide structure. By the end of this week, learners will understand that resilience depends on both governance and technology, and that securing supply chains requires coordinated responsibility across developers, leaders, and regulators.
 Produced by BareMetalCyber.com

This week highlights the role of architecture as the skeleton of security. Students learn how flat networks and perimeter-based models have failed under modern conditions, with the Target breach serving as a cautionary case. Defense in depth, segmentation, and microsegmentation are introduced as structural strategies for containing adversaries. The rise of zero trust architecture reframes trust as something to be earned continuously rather than assumed, while the lifecycle of SSL and TLS illustrates how protocols evolve to meet new demands.

Learners explore architectural trade-offs, where gains in performance or convenience often come at the expense of visibility and control. Case studies of Heartbleed and DigiNotar demonstrate how shared components and certificate authorities create systemic risks. By the end of the week, students will understand that secure design is about resilience and adaptability, balancing usability, cost, and complexity while embedding monitoring, redundancy, and recovery at the core.
 Produced by BareMetalCyber.com

With the dissolution of traditional network perimeters, identity has emerged as the central gatekeeper of enterprise security. This week explores authentication, authorization, and access control as critical building blocks of trust. Students examine the weaknesses of passwords, the rise of multi-factor authentication, and the push toward passwordless and biometric methods. Federation protocols such as SAML, OAuth2, and OpenID Connect are studied for their role in enabling single sign-on and cloud adoption, while case studies of breaches at T-Mobile, Peloton, and Okta illustrate the dangers of misconfiguration and overreliance on central providers.

Attention also turns to insider threats, zero trust architecture, and machine identities, revealing how risk extends beyond human users. Learners explore how least privilege, monitoring, and governance provide defense against misuse of legitimate credentials. By the end of this week, students will understand why identity is both a technical and cultural challenge—an evolving frontier where usability, governance, and security converge.
 Produced by BareMetalCyber.com