Leading scientists with PhDs in biochemistry and genetics explain why evolution is mathematically impossible. Discover evidence from hormone complexity, genetic conservation, and probability calculations that support intelligent design over naturalistic origins. In this Science Conversations episode, explore compelling arguments from credentialed researchers including: **Professor David Gower** - Emeritus Professor of Steroid Biochemistry, University of London. Explains how hormone regulatory systems demonstrate irreducible complexity requiring a Creator. **Dr. John Cramer** - Senior biochemist, University of Guelph. Reveals how "archaic bacteria" are actually MORE complex than regular bacteria, contradicting evolutionary timlines. **Dr. James Allen** - Former Senior Lecturer in Genetics, University of Stellenbosch. Former atheist turned creationist who demonstrates genetic conservation patterns that evolution cannot explain. **Dr. John Baumgardner** - Research scientist, Los Alamos National Laboratory (PhD Geophysics). Mathematical probability analysis proving even trillions of years wouldn't allow enough mutations for basic proteins. This is Part 3 of our series examining credentialed scientists who reject Darwinian evolution based on empirical evidence from their specialized fields. Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Can scientists reject evolution without religious bias? Discover why leading scientists like Francis Collins, Anthony Flew, and Thomas Nagel argue evolution is impossible based on biochemical complexity and intelligent design evidence.In this episode of Science Conversations, we explore how prominent scientists from secular universities challenge Neo-Darwinism, not from religious conviction, but from examining reproducible scientific evidence. Learn about the academic pressures scientists face when questioning evolution and why the evidence for intelligent design continues to grow stronger. Featured Scientists Discussed:• Francis Collins - Human Genome Project Director• Anthony Flew - Nobel Prize Winner & Former Atheist• Thomas Nagel - Philosophy Professor, NYU• Jerry Fodor - Philosopher & Evolution Critic Key Topics Covered:✅ Why mutations cannot produce complex biochemical systems✅ Academic freedom challenges in evolutionary biology✅ The difference between reproducible evidence vs. assertions✅ Jerry Fodor's "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings" controversy✅ Richard Dawkins vs. Jonathan Sarfati debate analysis Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode. Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity. KEY TOPICS COVERED:• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified• Alternative cosmology models and evidence• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins. Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode. Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity. KEY TOPICS COVERED:• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified• Alternative cosmology models and evidence• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins. Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Leading astronomers expose fatal problems with Big Bang theory including dark matter, cosmic background radiation issues, and evidence for supernatural creation. Discover why this cosmological model relies on unobserved fudge factors and contradicts astronomical observations. Key topics covered:- Dark matter and dark energy as unproven constructs- New Scientist open letter from top astronomers including Hilton Arp- Alternative explanations for cosmic microwave background radiation- Supernova remnant evidence supporting young universe- Fully formed spiral galaxies contradicting Big Bang predictions- Planetary magnetic field measurements indicating recent creation This Science Conversations episode reveals how the Big Bang theory survives only through adjustable parameters while growing astronomical evidence supports biblical creation accounts. Perfect for those interested in creation science, biblical cosmology, and alternative scientific perspectives. Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Scientists REJECT Big Bang theory due to impossible mathematical odds! Discover why leading physicists found fatal flaws in this cosmological model. Universe fine-tuning reveals evidence for design. Join Kaysie Vokurka in Science Conversations as she explores fundamental problems with Big Bang cosmology. From the mysterious "singularity" and fourth-dimensional hyperspace, to Fred Hoyle’s legendary critique, learn why the odds of our universe forming by chance are mathematically impossible. Key topics include: What the Big Bang Theory actually claims—and common misconceptions Fred Hoyle’s rejection and the origin of the “Big Bang” name Fine-tuning of carbon atoms and universal constants Mathematical impossibilities: odds as low as 1 in 10^10^123 Why hyperspace expansion lacks evidence Cosmological constant precision requirements Evidence pointing to intelligent design Expert analysis breaks down the complex physics and mathematics that challenge naturalistic explanations for the universe’s origin—revealing why the evidence points toward supernatural creation. Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Carbon-14 dating controversy: measurable carbon-14 found in dinosaur fossils, coal, and billion-year-old diamonds. Discover why these findings challenge radiometric dating and the evolution timeline. Unlock the shocking science behind carbon-14 dating! This episode explores how measurable carbon-14 has been found in materials supposedly millions or even billions of years old—like coal, dinosaur fossils, and diamonds. Dr. John Ashton reveals why these results challenge conventional geological timelines and support young earth creation science. Learn about key issues with radiometric dating, including cosmic ray formation, Earth's magnetic field, atmospheric carbon variations, and calibration problems. Plus, real-world dating errors from European artifacts and fossil wood! Join Kaysie Vokurka for Science Conversations as we dig into the facts, the flaws, and the fascinating evidence that’s rewriting the story of Earth’s age. Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts

How accurate is radiometric dating? Discover shocking problems with radiometric dating methods, wild inconsistencies in rock ages, and why rocks of known age often test as millions or billions of years old. Science Conversations exposes the truth about radiometric dating accuracy with real scientific evidence and critical thinking. Join host Kaysie Vokurka as she interviews a leading scientist to reveal:• Why different radiometric dating methods (rubidium-strontium, potassium-argon, lead-lead, samarium-neodymium) produce wildly different ages for the same rock sample.• Documented cases where rocks of known historical age (like Hawaiian lava flows and Mount St. Helens) are dated as billions of years old.• How selection bias and “cherry-picking” of results shape the accepted geological timeline.• Evidence from top institutions (Australian National University, peer-reviewed textbooks) challenging the reliability of radiometric dating.• The need for a critical reevaluation of dating methods in modern science. If you’re passionate about science, critical thinking, or want to understand the real evidence behind radiometric dating, this episode is for you. Subscribe for more Science Conversations exploring science, faith, and evidence-based discussion. Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Radiometric dating accuracy questioned as creation scientist exposes carbon dating flaws, geological dating problems, and uniformitarian assumptions. Major scientific evidence challenges millions of years timeline with erosion rates, catastrophic geology, and biblical flood model supporting young earth creation science. Join Kaysie Vokurka on Science Conversations as we investigate the fundamental problems with radiometric dating. This episode unpacks the circular reasoning, key assumptions, and scientific inconsistencies that challenge the supposed reliability of geological dating. Discover how catastrophic events, erosion rates, and the biblical flood model present a radically different timeline. Key Topics:• Radiometric dating assumptions & limitations• Circular reasoning in geological dating• Uniformitarian vs catastrophic geology• Erosion rates vs deep time• Isochron dating methodology flaws• Young earth evidence from creation science Related Content:• Creation Science Evidence• Biblical Flood Geology• Young Earth Scientific Evidence Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Groundbreaking DNA research is shattering the evolutionary timeline! In this eye-opening episode of Science Conversations, Dr. John Ashton reveals explosive scientific evidence showing life on Earth simply cannot be millions of years old. What You’ll Discover: • DNA’s Time Limit: Human DNA accumulates 90,000 errors in just 6,000 years. By 6 million years, 3% of our genetic code would be damaged—making long-term survival impossible.• Genetic Decay Accelerates: Over 10,000 genetic diseases now catalogued, and the number keeps rising.• Soft Tissue Shockers: Collagen, muscle fiber, and DNA fragments found in dinosaur fossils supposedly 70 million years old—biologically impossible!• Living Bacteria in Ancient Salt: Viable bacteria discovered in “250 million year old” salt crystals—contradicting evolutionary dating.• Mitochondrial Mayhem: Just 1% of genes control 10% of our DNA’s function, and errors here rapidly lead to organism failure.• Mutation Rates Confirm Young Life: Dr. John Sanford (Cornell University) calculates a maximum realistic age for life on Earth: 10,000–100,000 years, more closely matching the biblical creation timeline. Why You Haven’t Heard This in School: Mainstream science textbooks rarely mention these findings, but top journals like Nature are publishing the data. The evidence is converging on a young Earth, supporting the Bible’s account and challenging the radiometric dating methods taught as fact. Don’t miss the finale of our radiometric dating series! Subscribe for more faith-affirming, evidence-based science that reveals God’s truth. Check out our other podcasts: Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

The evidence is overwhelming: radiometric dating methods simply don’t match up with real-world geological data. In part 2 of this explosive series, Kaysie Vokurka and Dr. John Ashton dig even deeper into the evidence that’s shaking the foundations of evolutionary timelines.What You’ll Discover in This Episode: • Why erosion rates prove continents couldn’t possibly survive for billions of years• Ocean sediment thickness reveals Earth’s true age (not the claimed 2.5 billion years)• Volcanic evidence that completely upends evolutionary dating• Where all the missing sediment went—according to biblical flood geology• How Grand Canyon rocks show impossible preservation over supposed millions of years Dr. Ashton shares jaw-dropping calculations: at current volcanic output rates (1 cubic mile per year), Earth should be buried under 12 miles of volcanic material if it were truly billions of years old. Instead, measurements show only 34 million years’ worth—a massive discrepancy that mainstream science can’t explain. The Biblical Flood Model Explains the Evidence: • Rapid sedimentation during catastrophic global events• Massive volcanic activity during the “fountains of the deep”• Mountain uplift explains marine fossils found at high elevations• Fossil preservation demands rapid, large-scale burial Key Evidence Highlighted: • Tambora volcano (1815): 25–70 cubic miles ejected in a single event• Lake Taupo: 260 cubic miles of material released• Historical lava flows radiometrically dated at millions of years when actually decades old This is part 2 of 3 in our radiometric dating investigation. Subscribe for more faith-affirming science content that challenges evolutionary assumptions with real evidence. Check out our other podcasts:Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

The age of the earth and radiometric dating. Evolutionary theory depends on assumed long ages of the earth, with fossil bearing strata estimated to be hundreds of millions of years old. Radiometric dating results appear to support and validate these long timeframes. Does all available data converge with this? Other evidence, such as continental and mountain erosion rates, does not align with these long time-periods and instead presents a much younger earth. How does this impact evolutionary assumptions? Check out our other podcasts: https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

The great flood of Noah. The book of Genesis records the lifespan of key individuals that lived on earth before the flood. It also accurately records when the flood occurred and the age of key individuals after the flood. While the age of those who lived before the flood averaged 900 years, the ages of those living after the flood dropped dramatically to 100-200 years within a few generations. How realistic are these lifespan records? Is there any evidence that supports these ages, along with a dramatic age reduction in a post-flood world scenario? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

The great flood of Noah.The flood story tells us that humanity was destroyed by the floodwaters except for 8 people who were spared on the ark. These people multiplied and spread out over the earth after the flood. The Bible records the genealogies of the first generations to be born after the flood, and notes that at a certain point, they spread out extensively over the earth. Is the historical evidence for the founders and starting points of ancient nations consistent with the Biblical record? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

The great flood of Noah.The Biblical flood story has been passed off as mythical by many. While there is no doubt that the story is miraculous, extra-biblical records of an ancient "flood story" are incredibly consistent with the Bible's account. These additional flood stories are found in cultures all over the world. What does all this mean for the story of a global flood? Is the story realistic? Is the historical evidence consistent?  Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts 

Evidence for the flood. Fossils in sedimentary layers provide clues regarding the nature and dynamics of rock formation conditions. Fossil footprint trackways provide significant evidence for catastrophic conditions. They paint a picture of all kinds of animals fleeing to higher ground while wading through fast moving water. Polystrate fossil trees also point to a dramatic past. Stripped of their tops and roots, these logs floated in an upright position and were buried in the same orientation through multiple different layers of sediment. These logs often contain fossils of animals and sea creatures mixed together. All of this evidence is most consistent with a global catastropic flood...an event which even explains the Ice-Age!   Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock layers lie conformably over each other, without evidence of erosion between them. This is the case even when the layers are unconventional. For example, entire sections of layers are missing in some locations, which represents gaps of tens to hundreds of millions of years, according to the conventional geologic column. Yet there is no evidence of erosion where the missing layers should be. In other instances, older rocks are situated on top of younger rocks, and do so over dozens of square kilometres. Once more, the layers sit perfectly over one another without surface disturbance. What explains this kind of evidence best? Long-age processes or a single global flood event? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock makes up about 75% of the earth's surface - a type of rock primarily laid down by water. Sedimentary rock strata combinations have the same deposition patterns around the world. In addition, single, continuous, layers of sedimentary rock can cover areas stretching hundreds of thousands of square kilometres and contain numerous fossils. How did these rocks form? By small, local, catastrophic conditions or a single, global flood situation? If local and spread out over millions of years, why is there a distinct lack of erosion between rock layers? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Fossil evidence for evolution. Many rock layers contain fossils of both extinct species and species that exist today. This presents a fascinating opportunity to see if the species alive today have evolved compared to their fossilised ancestors. Research examining this found no change between the species, despite the assumed age of the fossils being millions of years in the past. If evolution occurred and continues to occur, why haven't the species alive today changed dramatically? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Fossil evidence for evolution. Certain rock layers contain numerous different fossilised organisms not found in the layers below them. Cambrian rock is a good example of this. Cambrian fossils are all fully-formed species - no intermediates. The layers underneath have no intermediates either, nor evidence of erosion which would suggest missing rock layers. The fully-formed species just suddenly appear in the so-called "Cambrian Explosion". Where are the intermediate fossils? What does this mean for evolution? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts