Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Business
Society & Culture
History
Sports
Technology
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts115/v4/be/c9/88/bec988e9-961c-6d98-0c8b-2358794cbc47/mza_14656457174900730016.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
The Catholic Thing
The Catholic Thing
60 episodes
7 hours ago
The Catholic Thing is a daily column rooted in the richest cultural tradition in the world, i.e., the concrete historical reality of Catholicism.
Show more...
Christianity
Education,
Religion & Spirituality,
News,
News Commentary
RSS
All content for The Catholic Thing is the property of The Catholic Thing and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The Catholic Thing is a daily column rooted in the richest cultural tradition in the world, i.e., the concrete historical reality of Catholicism.
Show more...
Christianity
Education,
Religion & Spirituality,
News,
News Commentary
Episodes (20/60)
The Catholic Thing
The Mother of God, Virgin in the Act of Giving Birth
By Michael Pakaluk
Did the Virgin Mary suffer the trauma of labor and its pains? Not a few preachers at Christmas Mass speak as if Mary did. But a long tradition in the Church presents a very different picture.
First, what does Scripture say?
"She gave birth to her son, the first-born, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger." (Luke 2:7). As the Catholic Encyclopedia observes, such language implies that Mary did not go through ordinary labor. Moms after labor are not in a position to stand up, get swaddling clothes, wrap their baby, and walk across the room to place him in a manger. Others must do this for them. Joseph is conspicuously not mentioned.
Luke also changes his language, from Elizabeth's case to Mary's. The change is not easy to see in English. He says about Elizabeth that "the time for Elizabeth to carry was completed, and she begat (egennēsen) a son" (1:57), using a word which means that this son sprang from her. But about Mary, Luke writes: "the time for her to carry was completed, and she bore (eteken) her son" (2:7), using a softer and ambiguous word, which in Greek is used for the gestation as well as parturition.
Besides, there are words in Greek for labor (see Matthew 24:8, Galatians 4:19). Wouldn't Luke the physician have deliberately employed these words, if Mary went through labor? For clearly, her labor would have been significant.
Then there are the Old Testament passages interpreted by the Fathers to mean that Mary's virginity was a like a gate, or a wall, through which nothing went in or out.

Consider Ezekiel, 44:2: "And the Lord said to me, 'This gate shall remain shut; it shall not be opened, and no one shall enter by it; for the Lord, the God of Israel, has entered by it; therefore, it shall remain shut.'" Of this verse, St. Ambrose says (Letter 42):
Why is it hard to believe that Mary gave birth in a way contrary to the law of natural birth and remained a virgin, when contrary to the law of nature the sea looked at Him and fled, and the waters of the Jordan returned to their source. . . It is not past belief that a man came from a virgin when a rock bubbled forth a flowing stream, iron floated on water, a man walked upon the waters. If the waters bore a man, could not a virgin give birth to a man [hominem virgo generare]?
The mode of birthing for a virgin bearing the God-man must be miraculous, St. Ambrose insists, just as her mode of conception of the God-man is miraculous.
Or consider Song of Songs, 4:12: "A garden locked is my sister, my bride, a garden locked, a fountain sealed." Of this verse, St. Jerome says (Against Jovinian, I.31, "That which is shut up and sealed stands for the mother of our Lord who was a mother and a Virgin."
Surely, we detract nothing from Mary's motherhood if we say she did not suffer labor. She was already fully a mother when she conceived Jesus: "And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?" (Luke 1:43), said most probably when Jesus was a blastula in a fallopian tube of Mary.
In God's intention for Creation, childbearing did not involve any trauma or pain: these are part of the penalty of the Fall. (Genesis 3:16) Then why should Mary, free from Original Sin from the moment of her conception, be subject to this penalty, any more than she was subject to disordered concupiscence?

Sometimes a Christian woman will choose to give birth without anesthesia, in solidarity with their sisters in the past, or to embrace some of the due penalty for sin - but not because she'd be less of a mother if she took pain relief. Similarly, no one believes that a mother who gives birth by C-section is thereby less of a mother.
Nor can one say that Mary's pain of childbirth was meant to be a pattern for us. Catholic hospitals place crucifixes over birthing beds, not pictures of Mary in labor. His own crucifixion, Our Lord says, is the proper pattern for a woman's throes of labor. (John 16:21) And wasn't Mary's role to suffer precisely...
Show more...
22 hours ago
5 minutes 38 seconds

The Catholic Thing
Gate of Heaven and Mother of God
By Saint John Henry Newman.
Mary is called the Gate of Heaven, because it was through her that our Lord passed from heaven to earth. The Prophet Ezekiel, prophesying of Mary, says, "The gate shall be closed, it shall not be opened, and no man shall pass through it, since the Lord God of Israel has entered through it - and it shall be closed for the Prince, the Prince Himself shall sit in it." Now this is fulfilled, not only in our Lord having taken flesh from her, and being her Son, but moreover, in that she had a place in the economy of Redemption; it is fulfilled in her spirit and will, as well as in her body.
Eve had a part in the fall of man, though it was Adam who was our representative, and whose sin made us sinners. It was Eve who began, and who tempted Adam. Scripture says: "The woman saw that the tree was good to eat, and fair to the eyes, and delightful to behold; and she took the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave to her husband, and he did eat."
It was fitting then in God's mercy that, as the woman began the destruction of the world, so woman should also begin its recovery, and that, as Eve opened the way for the fatal deed of the first Adam, so Mary should open the way for the great achievement of the second Adam, even our Lord Jesus Christ, who came to save the world by dying on the Cross for it.
Hence Mary is called by the holy Fathers a second and a better Eve, as having taken that first step in the salvation of mankind which Eve took in its ruin. How, and when, did Mary take part, and the initial part, in the world's restoration? It was when the Angel Gabriel came to her to announce to her the great dignity which was to be her portion.
St. Paul bids us to "present our bodies to God as a reasonable service." We must not only pray with our lips, and fast, and do outward penance, and be chaste in our bodies; but we must be obedient, and pure in our minds. And so, as regards the Blessed Virgin, it was God's will that she should undertake willingly and with full understanding to be the Mother of our Lord, and not to be a mere passive instrument whose maternity would have no merit and no reward.
The higher our gifts, the heavier our duties. It was no light lot to be so intimately near to the Redeemer of men, as she experienced afterwards when she suffered with Him.
Therefore, weighing well the Angel's words before giving her answer to them - first she asked whether so great an office would be a forfeiture of that Virginity which she had vowed. When the Angel told her no, then, with the full consent of a full heart, full of God's love to her and her own lowliness, she said, "Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it done unto me according to thy word." It was by this consent that she became the Gate of Heaven.

[And "Mother of the Creator."]
This is a title which, of all others, we should have thought it impossible for any creature to possess. At first sight we might be tempted to say that it throws into confusion our primary ideas of the Creator and the creature, the Eternal and the temporal, the Self-subsisting and the dependent; and yet on further consideration we shall see that we cannot refuse the title to Mary without denying the Divine Incarnation - that is, the great and fundamental truth of revelation, that God became man.
And this was seen from the first age of the Church. Christians were accustomed from the first to call the Blessed Virgin "The Mother of God," because they saw that it was impossible to deny her that title without denying St. John's words, "The Word (that is, God the Son) was made flesh." And in no long time it was found necessary to proclaim this truth by the voice of an Ecumenical Council of the Church.
For, in consequence of the dislike which men have of a mystery, the error sprang up that our Lord was not really God, but a man, differing from us in this merely - that God dwelt in Him, as God dwells in all good men, only in a higher measure; as the Holy Spirit dwelt in Angels and Proph...
Show more...
1 day ago
5 minutes 21 seconds

The Catholic Thing
On the 'Happy' in Happy New Year
By Francis X. Maier
Pascal Bruckner, the political philosopher, is a classic French intellectual. Raised Catholic and educated in Jesuit schools, his adult thought is thoroughly secular. But he has a keen intellect, a clever pen, and a lively skepticism. And, to his credit, he applies it with vigor to a wide range of sacred cows - including the God-vacant modernity of which he himself is a creature.
One of Bruckner's key targets is the cult of counterfeit happiness that, in his view, rules our age. On the one hand, he argues that religious faith infantilizes its followers. "It is typical of Christianity," he writes, "to have overdramatized our existence by subjecting it to the alternative between hell and paradise. . . .Pass or fail: Paradise is structured like a school."
Can the meager sins of our tiny world - Bruckner asks derisively - earn endlessly disproportionate torment in the next? Yet at the same time, he notes that man's repudiation of God has not produced freedom, but a vulgar universe of advertising instead. In effect, what was liberated by humanity's perceived psychic and sexual coming of age "was less our libido than our appetite for unlimited shopping."
For Bruckner, we've become little more than the "galley slaves of pleasure." Every new distraction, gadget, and tech marvel drives our hedonism more deeply into its own exhausted punishment.

Past cultures accepted suffering as a normal, often meaningful, element of life. Happiness was seen as fragile and transient. Real joy was exceptional. For Bruckner, our age, especially in the West, has turned such thinking upside down. We're expected - in effect, we're commanded by 24/7 marketing - to be happy with the deluge of options presented to us.
When we're not, we're failures; or worse, deviants. "Happy Honda Days" become a sacrament of the consumer holiday season. As a result, despite mountains of contrary evidence in the real world, we insist on a spirit of mandatory optimism; we're "the world's first societies that make people unhappy, not to be happy."
In the end, modernity has "raised human hopes so high that it can only disappoint us." And this provides a bitter revenge for religions: "They may be in bad shape, but what succeeded them isn't doing so well, either."

True, that. Bruckner is strong medicine. No one will confuse him with Mr. Glad Pants. His lack of religious faith looks suspiciously like a case of self-inflicted blindness. And despite (or perhaps because of) his Jesuit background, his grasp of Christianity seems barely adolescent.
But on the final day of an old year and the brink of a new one, Bruckner's thoughts are nonetheless worth considering. Around the world tonight people will be wishing each other a happy new year. Yet the lights will be out in the Maier household by 10 pm. The idea of celebrating a giant electric ball falling at midnight in Manhattan to welcome in another hangover January just doesn't tickle the heartstrings.
So what exactly can "happiness" mean in an age of noise and manufactured excitement - an age, not by accident, rich in anxiety and conflict? And what about joy? We're still in the Christmas season, the very reason for "joy to the world."
For both C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien, happiness and joy are related, but finally very different things. This becomes clear throughout their fiction and other writings. In Tolkien, happiness is always in some sense selfless. It flows from doing what's right, even at great cost. It's tied to sacrifice, friendship, faithful service, fulfilling one's appointed purpose, and the enjoyment of simple pleasures in the natural world. Lewis likewise saw happiness as a matter of this-world satisfaction, the fruit of success, comradeship, innocent pleasures, and basic comforts.
Note that none of the above easily survives in a culture of constantly teased and escalating appetites. In fact, the happiness of a society - consider the state of our own - seems inversely proportional to the self-fo...
Show more...
2 days ago
6 minutes 10 seconds

The Catholic Thing
Incarnation Wonder
By Randall Smith
Many have likely seen the amazing photos from the James Webb Space Telescope showing thousands of galaxies. Not just stars, mind you, but galaxies, each of which is filled with trillions of stars. Now imagine those thousands upon thousands of galaxies condensed down into an infinitely dense point the size of - nobody really knows - but let's say, the size of a baseball. Something like this is the picture we have of the Big Bang Theory of the beginning of our universe. It may or may not be what actually happened, but we can conceive of it as a possibility.
I mention the possibility merely as a way of wrapping our minds around what is involved in the Incarnation. The Creator of all those galaxies and every atom and quark in them - the infinite Source of the Being and Goodness of whatever exists - constricted Himself down to the size of a baby - to the size of an embryo. In the movie Aladdin, the genie mentions the paradox of having "phenomenal cosmic power" in an "itty bitty living space." He's not even close to the greatness of the power or the smallness of the space.
In Philippians 2:7, Paul says that Christ "emptied himself" of his divinity and took on our humanity. Do we quite understand how radical a claim that is? The Incarnation isn't like Apollo or Zeus appearing to someone or taking control of a human body for a while. Those "gods" are localized entities, not as vast as the entire universe. The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob - God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit - is more vast than the universe itself.
All that is hard enough to get our heads around. Actually, I don't think we can ever really get our heads around it. We don't even know what "dark matter" is, or what's inside a black hole, or why the Higgs Boson does what it does. Whereas God not only knows those things completely, He made them, and they only continue to exist because He is keeping them in existence. The difference between that "mind" and our minds is like the difference between a cherry tomato and the entire galaxy - only now you need to multiply that difference by the biggest number you can think of, and you'd still not be close.
Okay, so now try to get your head around the notion that it's that God who actually loves us. Not only does He take notice of us, like you might notice a moderately interesting pebble at the beach, which would be startling enough. There has to be more interesting stuff to gaze at in the universe than me. There are more interesting things on this desk than me. But God not only notices, He actually loves us.
How do we know that? Why would we think that He even cares? The laws of quantum physics don't care about the world or you. They just are. Why would anyone come to the rather startling conclusion that the universe is a gift of boundless, infinite love? It's not immediately apparent just from looking at things in the world, so we should be very understanding when some of our fellow citizens find it difficult to believe.

Christians believe that the evidence for this all-pervading creative love is found in the Incarnation. A God bigger than we can even imagine chooses to become incarnate in an embryo smaller than we can see with the naked eye. It certainly turns everything upside down. Pope Benedict XVI wrote somewhere that this is like balancing the well-being of the entire cosmos on the head of a pin.
The most powerful force in the entire universe became incarnate in perhaps the most powerless thing we can imagine. Is there anything more powerless than a baby? God has not only "taken on our humanity," He has taken on our humanity at its weakest and most defenseless. And then, He goes even further and does the one thing the classical Greek gods could never do: die. He dies for us, taking on Himself both our sin and our death to vanquish both. Again, we need to be understanding of people who can't quite wrap their heads around this. It's a lot.
But we should at least be clear about this. If Christ is not ...
Show more...
3 days ago
5 minutes 58 seconds

The Catholic Thing
The Holy Innocents
By Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas
The Church, "expert in humanity" (as Pope Paul VI put it), knows that the mystery of Christmas (like that of Easter) is so great that it cannot be adequately plumbed - let alone celebrated - in a single day. And so, taking a page out of our Jewish liturgical heritage, the Church gives us an octave observance - eight full days to consider the central doctrine of the Incarnation, enabling us to reflect on it from a variety of perspectives, not unlike holding a diamond up to the sun to appreciate its beauty from many different angles.
Throughout the Christmas Octave, we encounter a number of saints' feasts. Do these commemorations serve as distractions from the central mystery of the Octave? Not at all - because, as St. Paul teaches us, "God is glorious in His saints." (2 Thessalonians 1:10) Indeed, we can say that the very first fruits of the Incarnation are saints, the comites Christi (the companions of Christ), and in this week, the majority of them are martyrs - privileged "witnesses" to Christ: Stephen, the so-called "proto-martyr" (Dec. 27); Thomas à Becket, the medieval defender of the freedom of the Church (Dec. 29); and also, the Holy Innocents, really the first to shed their blood for Christ.
We are introduced to the "Holy Innocents" by St. Matthew (Chapter 2 Verses 16-18) after he has told us of the visit of the Magi, whom Herod wanted to use as "reconnaissance" men to determine the identity of this "newborn King of the Jews." Not obtaining the information he desired, Herod resorts to mass murder to ensure his competition is dead, ordering the execution of all male babies under the age of two in Bethlehem.
The Collect for the day's liturgy notes that these little ones confessed the true faith, "not by speaking but by dying." Indeed, the very word "infans" in Latin means one who cannot yet speak! The prayer goes on to ask the Lord for the great grace "that the faith in you which we confess with our lips we may also speak through the manner of our life."
The Office of Readings for the feast treats us to a reflection of Quodvultdeus, a fifth-century bishop of Carthage in North Africa and a spiritual son of the great St. Augustine. The author addresses a question to the absent Herod: Why are you afraid, Herod, when you hear of the birth of a king? He does not come to drive you out, but to conquer the devil. But because you do not understand this you are disturbed and in a rage, and to destroy one child whom you seek, you show your cruelty in the death of so many children.
The Church in the United States has seen in the Holy Innocents the forerunners of the millions of babies slaughtered through legalized abortion. And we have witnessed the fear and rage of those ensnared in the culture of death. But why such rage? The vast majority of pro-lifers offer a kindly protest. The rage is born, no doubt, because - deep down - everyone knows the truth of what is happening in the abortion clinics.

The Church in America - especially the hierarchy - have made numerous mistakes in the post-Vatican II era. One area in which the Church shines, however, is in her unrelenting pro-life witness. Ours was a lone voice in the immediate wake of Roe v. Wade. In fact, the pro-abortionists used our solitary witness to play the anti-Catholic card, hoping to make the issue appear as a sectarian Catholic issue.
Our Catholic school system provided strength and youthfulness to the pro-life movement. A few years ago after the March for Life in Washington, D. C., a journalist in favor of "abortion rights" noted in the Washington Post (also strongly pro-abortion) that he was "expecting to write about [the March's] irrelevance." But admitted: "I was especially struck by the large number of young people among the tens of thousands at the march." He highlighted the fact that the vast majority came from Catholic schools who "were taught from an early age to oppose abortion."
Europeans are stunned by the vitality of the pro-l...
Show more...
4 days ago
6 minutes 8 seconds

The Catholic Thing
Imitating the Holy Family
By Fr. Paul D. Scalia.
The collect for today's feast prays, "O God, who were pleased to give us the example of the Holy Family, graciously grant that we may imitate them." Now, that's a tall order. After all, the Holy Family was exceptional. Inimitable, one might say. Joseph and Mary were indeed married. But their marriage was unlike any other. Jesus was indeed their Son. . .but not in the usual sense.
Still, this collect and the intuition of the faithful throughout history indicate that there is, in fact, something to be imitated here. And capable of imitation. Now, that doesn't mean tugging the Holy Family down to our level. Rather, what we encounter in a unique and unrepeatable way in the Holy Family reveals what is true for every family.
First, the Holy Family begins with the love of Joseph and Mary. Many Christians might see their marriage as something of a fiction. Mary was going to have a baby and there needed to be a husband/father in the picture. Hence the depictions of the doddering old Joseph trying to keep up with Jesus and Mary.
But God doesn't traffic in make-believe. Joseph and Mary loved one another with an authentic spousal love, even if it was lived out in a unique manner. She entrusted herself and her vowed virginity to his protection. He gave himself in love as her spouse and guardian. What each desired for the other was the holiness to which God called them. Her sanctity inspired his generous response to God and his protection enabled hers.
Just so, the holiness of a family begins with the love of the spouses. This isn't the romanticized "soulmate" theory that ironically leads to infidelity and broken families. No, it's the simple spousal love discerned by a bride and groom that prompts them to vow permanence, fidelity, and openness to children. It is the daily choosing to love one another that not only keeps those vows intact but also deepens them.
Second, although Joseph and Mary never had conjugal relations, they were nevertheless open to life - obviously, in an exceptional way. The Child born of Mary is the fruit of their union. Their marriage already existed at the time of Christ's conception. It was within their marriage that He was conceived. It was due not only to her faith in God but also to her trust in Joseph that Mary could say Yes to the angel. This singular openness to life brought the Lord of Life into the world.

"Be fruitful and multiply." That is God's first and thus most fundamental command. As with all His commands, it's for our good, and flouting it only brings us sadness. A couple's openness to children - and, even better, their generosity in receiving them - indicates trust in God's providence and a willingness to be stretched in self-giving. That openness and generosity in turn become a means of sanctification, of growing in trust and self-giving. The ordinary sacrifices of mothers and fathers have been woven into the fabric of Christian holiness.
Third, the Holy Family had a clear purpose. Indeed, a mission. Christ had been entrusted to the marriage of Joseph and Mary. Their mutual love established the home where He was received and where He "advanced in wisdom and age and favor before God and man." (Luke 2:52) In short, their purpose was Jesus. Everything about their love and their home was ordered towards Him and His mission.
Every family has a mission and purpose. On a natural level, the family brings many benefits to society (and as the family unravels, we're sadly discovering how many of those benefits will be lost). But the ultimate purpose of the family is beyond this world. Indeed, as with the Holy Family, the purpose of every family is Jesus Christ. To give Him a dwelling place in the home, among the members. To increase in knowledge and love of Him, to grow in the capacity to imitate Him.
Finally, the Holy Family prayed. Given the presence of the Incarnate Word and the Immaculate Conception in their home, their prayer would have been unique. But in another sense, it wa...
Show more...
5 days ago
5 minutes 30 seconds

The Catholic Thing
Benedict's Maestro Makes Music for Leo
By Fr. Raymond J. de Souza.
High culture - and the spiritual appreciation of high culture - returned to the Vatican this month. Pope Leo XIV is quietly restoring some recent traditions, such as personally celebrating Holy Mass on Christmas morning, not done since 1994. Earlier this month, he brought back the classical sacred music concert.
Sixty years ago, at the conclusion of Vatican II, some "messages" were read to various groups; one was to artists, including musicians:
The Church of the council declares to you, if you are friends of genuine art, you are our friends. The Church needs you and turns to you. Do not refuse to put your talents at the service of divine truth. Do not close your mind to the breath of the Holy Spirit.
A few months later, in April 1966, St. Paul VI made this friendship manifest by attending a concert at the St. Cecilia auditorium near the Vatican. Four years later, in honor of his priestly golden jubilee, Beethoven's Missa Solemnis was performed in his presence in St. Peter's Basilica itself.
Post-conciliar papal patronage of classical music reached its apogee forty years ago. St. John Paul the Great, on a visit to Austria in 1983, met the celebrated Herbert von Karajan, who suggested that a magnificent Mass setting should be performed at a Pontifical Mass. John Paul agreed.
In 1985, for the feast of Saints Peter and Paul, Karajan conducted Mozart's Coronation Mass in St. Peter's. The Vienna Philharmonic was joined by renowned soloists, including Kathleen Battle. It was the final great moment of the "conductor of Europe's" career, and the elderly and infirm Karajan received Holy Communion from the Holy Father himself. He would die four years later, reconciled with the Church, with which his relationship had been fraught.
The grand papal concerts continued, with another highlight coming in 1994, when John Paul held a concert to commemorate the Shoah, conducted by Gilbert Levine in the Paul VI Audience Hall. It was a moment of high history and intense emotion. The chief rabbi of Rome sat beside the Holy Father. Richard Dreyfuss recited the Kaddish. Cardinal Jean-Marie (born Aron) Lustiger of Paris, whose mother was killed at Auschwitz, embraced Levine. It was music fulfilling its highest vocation.
Pope Benedict XVI had a high appreciation for music, and was a musician himself, playing Mozart on the piano. It was fitting then that this year the Ratzinger Prize for distinguished achievement in scholarship and culture was awarded to his longtime friend, Maestro Riccardo Muti.

Even better, after something of a suspension of papal concerts under Pope Francis, the prize was conferred by Pope Leo XIV himself at a concert offered by Muti in the Paul VI Hall. He chose Luigi Cherubini's Coronation Mass of Charles X, composed in 1825. Muti chose the Mass on its bicentennial, a moment in which sacred music itself (briefly) reasserted its presence in the cultural and spiritual patrimony of France after the vandalism of the revolution and terror. Charles X's coronation was the first since 1775, and the last for the French monarchy.
In receiving the prize, Muti spoke with affection for Pope Leo, recalling his many years as musical director of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra. Muti mentioned that he had conducted Haydn's Seven Last Words of Our Savior on the Cross at Holy Name Cathedral in Chicago, with Cardinal Cupich narrating the work.
Muti further recalled Benedict's thoughts about sacred music. In 2015, Benedict received in retirement an honorary doctorate from the Pontifical University John Paul II of Kraków and the Kraków Music Academy. He spoke on that occasion of the "three places" whence music comes - the experience of love, the experience of sadness, suffering, and loss, and the encounter with the divine:
The quality of music depends on the pureness and greatness of the meeting with God, with the experience of love and of suffering. The purer and the truer that experience is, the purer and greater the mus...
Show more...
6 days ago
5 minutes 55 seconds

The Catholic Thing
Christmas Joy
By Stephen P. White
The history of salvation is long. It begins, as we read in Genesis, even before Creation itself. Before space and time were, God already was preparing all that would unfold. The ultimate culmination of that story is as yet unknown, though it has been revealed to us in part. Our own part in the story of salvation is unfolding every moment. And while God comprehends all from outside of time, our own actions and choices cooperate (or not) with the plan which He laid down before the foundation of the world.
We human creatures are not eternal beings; we have a beginning. While our bodies are mortal, our souls are not; there is no end to us. Unlike God, we are changeable - mutable, in the language of theologians and philosophers - in both our mortal bodies and our immortal souls.
From the study of physics we learn about the conservation of mass and energy, by which all the mass and energy that ever was or will be already exists. Carl Sagan famously observed that we are "star dust," which is true in one sense. But the celestial origins of our material existence do not tell the whole story. We are more than recycled bits of the Big Bang's leftovers. Much more.
With the creation of every new soul, an entirely new thing comes into existence. The composition of the cosmos changes in kind, not just degree. When a new person comes into existence, reality itself is altered forever. Souls are not star dust, neither do they pass away.
And so there are new things - genuinely new things - which come into existence every day. Changes - irrevocable, eternal changes - happen all around us. New souls come into being. Souls are marked indelibly with baptism or by holy orders. Souls are parted, for the time being, from their mortal bodies. Souls are judged. And they are saved or they are damned.
The history of salvation, told in something like its fullness, is a story not only of Creation, but of God's continual intervention. God visits His people. He makes covenants with them. He calls them to Himself. He chastises them and shows them mercy. He delivers them from bondage. He keeps His promises.

The central event in this long tale of salvation history is, of course, the greatest New Thing in all Creation. An angel appears to Mary, and she conceives by the Holy Spirit: the Word made flesh. A child is born in Bethlehem. He grows in wisdom and favor before God and man. He is tempted. He is without sin. He preaches the coming of the Kingdom and good news to the poor. He performs great miracles. He is betrayed, suffers, dies, descends into hell, rises, and ascends to the right hand of the Father. He sends the Holy Spirit. He feeds His people with His own body and blood. He keeps His promises.
The scope of this glorious mystery is so vast that it can be difficult, if not impossible, to behold all at once. The Church, in her wisdom, recalls it through the rhythms of the liturgical year. We savor one moment at a time through our successive feasts. The whole is always there, but we encounter it most often in some particular facet: the life of some great saint, the commemoration of great moments in the life of our Lord or of the Blessed Virgin, whole seasons of penance and rejoicing.
It is at Easter, and particularly the Easter Vigil, that the Church draws our eyes to the broadest horizon. We hear the whole story of salvation history, and the full glory and import of the Resurrection is made as plain to mortal minds as our liturgy and praise can make it. Easter joy is cosmic, triumphant, exhilarating. Easter joy is all trumpet blasts and blinding light. Easter joy is apocalyptic in the oldest sense: a revelation of what was previously hidden in the divine mind.
The joy of this season, Christmas joy, is of a different timbre altogether. Christmas joy is humble, quiet, less exalted, somehow more profoundly. . .human. The joy of Christmas is as different from that of Easter as the smile of a sleeping baby is from a triumphal march of the K...
Show more...
1 week ago
5 minutes 38 seconds

The Catholic Thing
A King is Born: Christ the Lord
By Fr. Thomas G. Weinandy, OFM Cap.
Luke's Gospel provides a rather detailed rendering of Jesus' birth. Because Mary "kept all these things, pondering them in her heart," she must have given her eyewitness account to Luke. Thus, the historicity of what is declared should not be challenged. Within Luke's written words, we hear Mary's spoken words.
So, Luke/Mary gives the historical setting of what would take place. Caesar Augustus decreed that a census should be taken throughout the Roman Empire. Everyone went to their home city to be enrolled. Thus, "Joseph also went up to Galilee, from the city of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be enrolled with Mary his betrothed, who was with child."
Joseph's lineage is theologically significant. He is from "the house of David," and so he must register "in the city of David," Bethlehem. It was here that David was born, and God told Samuel to anoint David king. "Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brothers; and the Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon David from that day forward." (1 Samuel 16:13)
Moreover, God later, speaking through Samuel, declared. "When your [David's] days are fulfilled and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come forth from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. He will build a house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever." (2 Samuel 7:12-13)
These prophetic promises are now being fulfilled as Joseph journeys to Bethlehem to be enrolled. The son to be born of Mary in the city of David is the Lord's anointed, the one who is filled with the Holy Spirit, having been conceived by the overshadowing of the Holy Spirit. He is the king of the everlasting Davidic kingdom, and his throne will last forever.
All this is founded upon Joseph's royal lineage, for he is of the house of David. Thus, Joseph is of foundational theological importance, for without him the child to be born of Mary would not be the fulfillment of God's ancient prophesies. He would not be the king of God's everlasting Davidic kingdom.
Now, while Joseph and Mary were in Bethlehem, "the time came for her to be delivered. And she gave birth to her first-born son and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger, because there was no place for them in the inn." There was nothing miraculous in the manner of His birth. If such was the case, Mary would have informed Luke, and he would have stated what was the nature of the miracle.
What is unusual is that, finding no room in the inn, Mary gave birth to Jesus in a stable, and so she placed him in a manger. He who will sit upon the royal throne as the king of David's everlasting kingdom is born in humble lowliness and unassuming poverty.

All of the above is implied within the context of Joseph's lineage as being from the house of David. No one has yet declared his royalty or spoken of his identity. Everything up to this point in Luke's narrative is simply normal - a baby was born of Mary in a stable in Bethlehem. However, in the midst of this normality, something will now be announced that is extraordinary.
"And in that region, there were shepherds out in the field keeping watch over their flock by night." This too is normal. This is what shepherds do. However, "an angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were filled with fear."
What has taken place on earth may have appeared normal, but the heavenly realm knew otherwise. One of the Lord's heavenly angels, engulfed in the Lord's glory, appeared to the shepherds. Though the shepherds were afraid upon beholding such a spectacular sight, the angel said to them:
Do not be afraid; for behold, I bring you good news of great joy which will come to all people; for to you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.
Rather than being a...
Show more...
1 week ago
6 minutes 3 seconds

The Catholic Thing
That He Will Come Again
By David Warren.
The road to Catholicism is not necessarily straight or smooth, and it may have been wiped out, for instance, by a mountain avalanche just when it was coming into view. In my case, even where there were no memorable avalanches, it took me half a century to get there, from my standing start in pre/post Protestantism.
For me, who had to convert even to become a secular Anglican, what kept me from Catholicism at the end was a combination of stubbornness (which I mistook for faith), and "family values," i.e., the need to prevent a divorce (mine). But when I was finally thrown out of my home, I became a free man.
Just like that, I then betrayed the Archbishop of Canterbury, and "poped."
This was a marvelous experience, for thanks to family law, I was also reduced to primitive poverty. This felt more authentic.
The Catholic Church herself seemed suddenly transformed. She no longer looked like a (rather flabby) sect. She actually began to detach herself from historical time, allowing me to wander freely and easily through her many periods, and to stand both inside and outside the centuries.
It just WAS, a complete THING, unlike any other thing or collection of things which I had ever seen. It no longer required an effort of imagination, for one could use one's eyes.
And I didn't need to judge, as I had been wont to do, and had been doing while keeping myself out. I realized the Church required prayer and not rebellion. She is not a "protest" against anything.
I thought it might restrain ME, for having been, as it were, white and English for too long (five centuries); yet I was freed from this anxiety, too, as well as lightened of goods. "My way is easy, and my burden is light." The need, or obsession, with material progress had disappeared.
We live in a world of efficient cooks, with their chopping blades. You are on one side or the other of a sharp knife, or a dull one in the case of Episcopalianism.
Heresies may be necessary to define a church, and blackguards to enforce the rules, but I think we can say that Christ's order is not the police order we see governing the world.
The question of what puts you in, or what takes you out, is like the other big questions. They may not be appealed to a "humane" court of law. If you have loved others as yourself, and put God atop your list of commandments, you are probably in.

And if you make peace, even in war, with the cause of justice, you may not survive, but have a chance of being right. Get rid of your modern prejudice against the free speech of Crusaders.
"We must have faith," which is something we can't check in immigration documents. But actually, one of the first things I learned, on the outside of worldliness, is that faith is not something one has. For that sort of thing cannot be mislaid, it can only be abandoned, to restore your faithlessness.
One could be "pro-" Catholic, and I certainly was, but what is a "pro-" unless edging towards membership in the divine body? And what is a genuine Catholic unless he is a bad Catholic? That's why the essence of Catholicism is now found when one is going to Confession.
It requires heroism, and of such a serene kind, that non-Catholics are actually embarrassed by it.
Faith isn't a physical thing, or we might claim to be faithful even to a set of antiquarian facts. Certainly, as a Protestant, I had this much "faith," and wished to have more.
I would join enthusiastically into arguments over whether Christ had even existed, whether the list of disciples was real, whether the "B.V.M." (the Anglican term for the Mother Mary) took part in the Dormition or Assumption, what was the third party of the Trinity. Or any other thing I now think plausible, but used to debate, usually from the atheist position in high school. But I found one could more easily stir things up by defending Humanae vitae.
That is what faith is not: gibberish. Nor is it "belief" in the facticity of anything at all, which we derive from history. It would not...
Show more...
1 week ago
6 minutes

The Catholic Thing
St. Jerome and the Lion
By Brad Miner
Then one of the elders said to me, "Do not weep. See, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has conquered, so that he can open the scroll and its seven seals."
Revelation 5:5
There's a story (likely a legend echoing the earlier Roman tale of Androcles and the lion) that one day in his study, St. Jerome (c. 342-420), hard at work translating the Holy Bible into Latin, had a visit from a lion. The lion had a splinter in its paw and begged the saint to remove it, which Jerome did, after which man and beast became inseparable.
Being a cat lover, I would very much like to have a lion as a friend, although not as a pet. I've seen videos of a South African "lion whisperer," who raised some abandoned lion cubs and stayed friends with them over the years, so that when he walks out into the veld and calls for them, they come running and jump up to put their paws on his shoulders and lick his face.

So, the story about Jerome and the lion could be true.
Many artists have depicted the scene, although, in earlier centuries, some of them did so without ever having seen a lion, and those lions resemble cats, dogs, or gargoyles. However, there were Asiatic lions in the desert in Israel when Jerome was living there, although by the time he was working on the Vulgate in Bethlehem, lions would have been a rare sight indeed.
But it could have happened. Because God was surely at work in Jerome's life, and maybe Jerome liked cats, and, as a reward for his sanctity, the Lord decided to give him the very biggest one.
In many Renaissance and later paintings, Jerome is shown in his cardinalitial regalia, but that's an anachronism. The cardinalate did not become a Church office until nearly three centuries after Jerome went to heaven. Memento mori images figure in some portraits of Jerome, as in the skull in Caravaggio's St. Jerome Writing (above).
In one of the earliest paintings of him, by Pinturicchio, the saint is half-naked, contemplating a crucifix that he has affixed to a branch of a small tree. On a rock to Jerome's left is another book that I'd like to think is his notebook. To his right is a nicely bound codex of the Hebrew Scriptures, perhaps. Or, more likely, it's a "first edition" of the Vulgate. In any case, it's slightly covered by his red cardinal's hat.

And next to the hat is the lion, who looks out at us warily. Or maybe it's a look of worry, because Jerome holds a rock in one hand, which he has been using to mortify his flesh. (So says the tradition.) His other hand gestures towards the open notebook as he gazes at the radiating image of Christ, fides quaerens intellectum. The lion hopes we'll pass by quietly and allow the saint to get on with his holy work.
My favorite painting of the saint and the big cat is St. Jerome in His Study by Niccolò Antonio Colantonio. Its composition is rich in detail. Here is Jerome
intent on removing a thorn from the paw of a melancholic and docile lion with a sort of scalpel. The wooden shelves behind him are crowded with a formidable still life of books, letters, scrolls, hourglasses, scissors, sealing wax, knotted cloths, ribbons, and writing instruments, carefully described and struck by the light. His cardinal's hat is prominently displayed on a table, and mice below, in the shadows, are gnawing on the papers that have fallen to the floor.

This suggests that, whether or not he kept a lion, Jerome would certainly have benefited from having a housekeeper. But at least Colantonio gives him a very regal lion.
This is all fanciful. But Jerome is truly among Catholicism's (and the world's) greatest scholar-evangelists. Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus - we call him Jerome - had been the confidential secretary to Damasus the first, pope from 366 to 384, and it was Damasus who tasked him to do a thorough revision of the Bible - both Testaments.
Jerome was the man for the job. A convert to Christianity, he had previously lived a life of indulgence not unlike the young St. Augus...
Show more...
1 week ago
6 minutes 34 seconds

The Catholic Thing
Of Light and Darkness
By Robert Royal.
Yesterday was the winter solstice, the point at which, because of variations in the way that the Earth orbits the Sun, night is longest, the "darkest day of the year." (It's also my birthday, and for some who have followed me over the years, I suspect, a dark day in a more than astronomical sense.) Maybe because of that accident of birth, I've always been struck by the line in Genesis, "And God said let there be light, and there was light." I've even, in my wavering efforts to learn Biblical Hebrew, memorized the original, וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, יְהִי אוֹר; וַיְהִי-אוֹר. Vayomer Elohim yehi or, vayehi or. Before that (if that's the right way to put it, since time has not been created yet), God is winding up to deliver the pitch, so to speak. And he does in what follows: "God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness."
Many things depend on that division - though, as we'll see below, not, ultimately, in the sense you might think. In a way, it's no surprise that it was a Jewish scientist, Albert Einstein, who first discovered the fundamental role of light in creation. Nothing can exceed the speed of light in our universe. Einstein's personal religious beliefs are a matter of debate, but is it wholly an accident that someone steeped in the Jewish tradition could have worked his way to that truth?
That whole tradition is with us, deeply, in this season. The birth of a baby is - or always should be - a cause for celebration. But that this baby entered our world around its darkest days is also surely more than a coincidence. People today tend to dismiss such speculations as "medieval." But as in many of the paradoxes of the Faith, the darkness is not incidental or merely symbolic or even - we'll come back to this - something left behind. In a deep sense, the darkness is also the reason for the season. Would light be so important without it?
If you think about it, too, why is it that Jesus was born at night? We only know that because the good Luke includes this detail: "Now there were shepherds in that region living in the fields and keeping the night watch over their flock." (Luke 2:8) It's fitting because the Jewish prophetic tradition suggests that night is the everyday reality in which we find ourselves.
In Handel's Messiah, which you should make a point of listening to every year at this time for your enjoyment but also edification, you'll hear a lot about God's glory and how we should be thankful to Him for redeeming us. "The people who sat in darkness have seen a great light."(Isaiah 9:2) And why are they sitting in darkness?

At a live performance last week, the section that most went home was, "And who shall abide the day of his coming?" which Handel selected from the prophet Malachi (Chapter 3: Verse 2). You would think that after all the darkness and suffering in the world, we'd all be glad to see Him. But the murky world that Original Sin and individual sins have laid upon us - and that we're so attached to - is a world that we don't give up easily. The Christian tradition reminds us that many of us will fear Christ's Second Coming. Even at His First Coming, there were those, like Herod, and later the Pharisees and Sadducees, who didn't exactly jump for joy at seeing Him.
We like Christmas, as it has become now, for obvious reasons. Gifts, parties, food, (Catholic) beverages, family, friends, good cheer, caroling, and at least minimal gestures of goodwill towards men. Even a secularist, rampant commercialism aside, might find all that a welcome respite from the grimness of the everyday. It's all quite Dickensian. But for a Christian, the grimness goes far deeper. Which is why the joy is all the greater.
And yet in the end, perhaps we need to put in a good word for darkness. The darkness around us and inside in our earthly existence is, in its way, part of God's mercy. Like all the trials and tribulations that stem from sin, as we see in Scripture, darkness is a spur to look...
Show more...
1 week ago
6 minutes 14 seconds

The Catholic Thing
A Thousandfold Intuited
By Fr. Benedict Kiely
A few months ago, I was lucky enough to be in the capital city of Slovakia, Bratislava, formerly Pressburg, staying in the beautiful Old Town, to speak at a conference. To say it is charming makes it sound like a wedding-cake creation; it charms because it is intact and as it should be, not ersatz and artificial, a Catholic town, in creation and in fact.
Navigating its very walkable streets (a weekend break would be ideal to see all that is necessary), you see that multiple churches are open and in use, with, on a Sunday, many families with numerous children spilling out into the small squares. Unlike its Czech neighbor, in Slovakia the Faith appears healthy, a sign of encouragement for those who believe any revival of the Faith in Europe will come, in good part, from its Central and Eastern nations.
St. Martin's Cathedral, in the very heart of the Old Town, is a small 15th-century Gothic jewel, simple and devout, dedicated to St. Martin of Tours, whom the populace claims as their own, which is technically correct, as parts of Slovakia were in what was called Pannonia.
This cathedral has seen kingdoms rise and fall - the kings of Hungary were crowned there. And there is a small shrine to the last Habsburg Emperor, Blessed Karl. In the lifetime of an elderly citizen, it also saw the horrors of the two most destructive atheistic ideologies ever known, Nazism and Communism. Both of those cruel systems attempted, as Herod tried and failed, to kill the rival to their earthly power, the true King, whose reign shall never cease.
As the Gospel was about to be proclaimed that Sunday, the organ prelude thundered, an acclamation, in the true sense, for a person of great dignity, a royal person. It was a greeting for the Word, who would appear in Scripture and Sacrament, most truly in His Real Presence - the bread and wine transformed into His Body and Blood. It's still as difficult to discern His divinity in those elements, just as it was a baby in a crib, except with the gift of faith, given to Shepherds and Magi.
The cathedral, as every church, humble chapel, or even, in necessity, table or Mass rock, is Bethlehem, the House of Bread, the royal palace of the hidden king.
There seemed to be something very appropriate about that triumphant organ. As Bishop Barron has written, during the reign of Caesar Augustus, trumpets and acclamations would greet the one perceived to be the King of the known world. Yet in silence, in "the fullness of time," the true King appears, not acclaimed by trumpet and organ, unknown, but recognised and adored by rough shepherds and wise seekers from the East.

He has no earthly army, but something much greater, the army of the Heavenly Host. The great and the good, if they even hear of the event, laugh it to scorn, a very contemporary reaction to the Gospel. Yet the story, as Chesterton said, is "plain enough to be understood by the shepherds, and almost by the sheep."
God confounds worldly wisdom with His hidden foolishness. "He came unto His own, and His own knew Him not." Why did they not recognise Him, whom all the prophets had foretold?
It was partly the "mystery of iniquity," of course, and the extraordinary simplicity of His birth. There is more, though: a God so close, so weak, so defenseless, is almost too much to accept, and therefore contradictory to the concept of divine omnipotence.
It is still the fashion, of those outdated critics of Christianity who have yet to realise their once fashionable views are now passé, to claim that, because pagan legends and myths included tales of a Virgin birth, or the appearance of a God in human form, this proves the Christmas tale to be just that: a tale like all the others. Hilaire Belloc, who punctured pomposity and intellectual cant with the weapon of his pen, quite accurately noted that "these are not pagan legends transformed. They are pagan foresights inherited."
As St. Paul identified, in his evangelism at the Areopagus, the nearby...
Show more...
1 week ago
6 minutes 12 seconds

The Catholic Thing
Flannery O'Connor and the Mass of the World
By Daniel B. Gallagher
When I first began devouring Catholic fiction in college, I couldn't figure out why J. F. Powers immediately struck a chord with me and Flannery O'Connor (this year is the centenary of her birth) did not. It wasn't that one was better than the other. Judging from their prose, they are both extraordinary stylists.
What I failed to recognize back then is now obvious to me. I was born in Pittsburgh, raised in Chicago, and educated at the University of Michigan. When I first read O'Connor, I knew much more about trains, factories, and blizzards than I did about heatwaves, fried shrimp, and peacocks. Everything I knew about racial segregation I read from books, including O'Connor's.
The Midwest is far from an egalitarian utopia, but it certainly lacks the Southern class structure upon which so many of O'Connor's plots turn. If I had been a more imaginative reader, stories like "Everything That Rises Must Converge" would have taught me something about a culture and a place of which I had absolutely no experience.
Yet I did know a thing or two about alcoholic priests and the affected robustness of many Midwest Catholic institutions, ranging from Notre Dame to the Knights of Columbus. Powers' stories made me laugh and showed me the narrative possibilities of an author who can wittily describe Midwest Catholic and clerical culture through the eyes of the rectory cat.
Since moving to Savannah a couple of years ago and working within blocks of O'Connor's childhood home, all of that has started to change for me. It didn't take long to meet people like Manley, the conniving Bible salesman in "Good Country People," and the self-righteous Grandmother in "A Good Man Is Hard to Find."

I've watched peacocks unfurl their plumage on O'Connor's Andalusia Farm in Milledgeville and knelt in the same pew O'Connor prayed as a girl living a stone's throw from Saint John the Baptist Cathedral. Even though I'll always be a Midwesterner, I'm starting to wrap my mind around what it meant for O'Connor to be a Southerner.
But I don't think I'll get very far, and that's okay. Because if I've learned anything from re-reading O'Connor in this centenary of her birth, it's that I'll never have to wrap my mind around her Southernness completely to understand her - at least not in the way a Southerner understands her.
Everywhere I go, I can't help but be a Midwesterner, just as O'Connor couldn't help being anything but a Southerner, be it in Iowa, New York, or Connecticut. Her one visit to Europe only reinforced her desire to stay put in the South.
While collecting her wits in Rome, she joked that she and her mother Regina - her sole companion on the journey - would "probably end up behind the Iron Curtain asking the way to Lourdes in sign language," adding that "my will is apparently made out of a feather duster." Her 14-year battle with lupus would make us think otherwise, but if she simply meant that she lacked the strength not only to put up with the inconveniences of traveling but to adapt to the cultures it took her to, it's a point well taken.
In O'Connor's mind, my boyhood home of Chicago - where Powers sets the first part of his great novel Morte d'Urban - is as far away from Milledgeville as Rome. Every detail of her five-day stint at the University of Chicago in 1959 "assisting" young female writers was unbearable. Living in the dormitory, O'Connor was obliged to give a public lecture that no one attended and then sit with the girls "drinking tea every afternoon while they tried to think of something to ask me. The low point was reached when - after a good ten-minute silence - one little girl said, 'Miss O'Connor, what are the Christmas customs in Georgia?'"
O'Connor found a way to apply this fierce loyalty to home to her soul as well. She would not tolerate a lack of integrity when it came to prayer, be it hers or that of others. Writing to her good friend Janet McKane, she describes an attempt to plow through Karl Rahner's On...
Show more...
1 week ago
5 minutes 50 seconds

The Catholic Thing
The Ecclesiastical Front in the War on Christmas
By John M. Grondelski
A suburban Boston Catholic parish ignited a controversy this Advent when its outdoor Nativity scene replaced the figure of the Baby Jesus in His crib with a sign, "ICE was here." The pastor contends the display moves "beyond static traditional figures and evokes emotion and dialogue."
A new battlefront is emerging in the "War on Christmas." For years, the "war on Christmas" was primarily a confrontation with encroaching secularism: many Americans' first encounter with the "naked public square" was the city hall park from which the traditional Nativity scene had been evicted, usually by court order. As wokeness spread, "Happy Holidays" became the euphemism for the holiday that dared not speak its name.
But the "War on Christmas" seems to have taken on a new frontline: Christians wanting to co-opt Christian symbolism as agitprop for political causes. The 2025 cause célèbre is immigration law enforcement.
News reports confirm that using crèches as partisan props is not limited to Massachusetts. In Illinois, one Nativity scene apparently features a Baby Jesus whose hands are zip-tied, the detention tactic used by ICE. Another has Jesus in a gas mask, an allusion to tactics used to disperse those illegally obstructing federal law enforcement activities.
As is typical of many controversies today, we're being presented with the claim that there are two sides to the question. Critics of the actions call it sacrilegious, using religious symbols for ideological purposes. Its defenders call it adapting the Gospel message to contemporary issues, causing people to grapple with applying Jesus's teachings to the times.
But there's a limit to this perspectivism. In Fiddler on the Roof, every time Tevye's daughters challenge him with some new issue, he's depicted mulling things over in his head. "'On the one hand….' 'On the other hand….' 'On the other other hand ….'" But, at a certain point, when Chava marries outside the faith, he raises his arms in a powerful gesture and shouts, "'No! There is no other hand!."
Suburban Boston and other Catholic venues in this fair land need a Tevye.

A manger scene - especially one in public - has one purpose: to give visible public witness to the truth of Christ's Incarnation: the Son of God made man. That is the purpose of every crèche scene. Anything that gets in the way of that message - whether by displacing, diluting, or distracting from it - does not belong there.
Certain brands of "political Catholics" - especially those prone to "accompanying" the Zeitgeist - appear afflicted by a peculiar form of ecclesiastical navel-gazing. They seem to forget that no small part of the world does not share their faith in God, much less in Christ, and even less in their political caricature of Christ.
In many Western societies, God, for increasing numbers of people, is as fictional as Santa Claus. Pope Leo warned against a "neo-Arianism" that accentuates Jesus as a great humanistic, ethical teacher, or prophet - maybe even poster boy for political causes, but one who gets tongue-tied in professing his divinity.
When that is the way of the world, Catholics who overlay the clarity of that religious message with others - including messages they perhaps deem "religious," but are arguably subordinate - compromise the Gospel. Such gestures divide the Church.
Press coverage sometimes suggests as much, noting how Catholics are visiting the South Dedham manger scene to "take sides" about it. No Catholic should have to "take sides" in front of a Nativity scene. No Catholic viewing it should have to confess any political profession alongside his profession of faith.
If he does, there's something gravely wrong there. This is not a denial of the Church's social teaching or corporal works of mercy, but a defense of the integrity of Catholic devotional symbolism.
The last two pontificates attached a premium to "ecclesial unity," which has primarily meant suppressing any manifestations of sympathy for the ...
Show more...
2 weeks ago
5 minutes 35 seconds

The Catholic Thing
A Pro-Life Christmas
by Michael Pakaluk
But first a note from Robert Royal: Several readers have recently written to ask what happened to our longtime columnist David Carlin. His son, Joshua, just contacted us to say that he passed away on December 12 (obiturary here). Dave was not only a forceful writer and thinker, as his work here consistently demonstrated. He was that rarest of rare birds: a pro-life Democrat. He kept up his work well into old age, and many of us remember him fondly. Requiem aeternam dona ei Domine.
Now for today's column...
Let's start with the "O Antiphons." They began yesterday. There are seven of them, and they end on December 23. Then, with Christmas Eve and Christmas, they make nine - a novena - which is a period of expectation, the same in number as the months of pregnancy.
So, the lead up to Christmas is like a leading up to birth.
It's fine and all to discourse about the O Antiphons, but to hear them in situ, it is necessary to go to Mass for those seven days, or to pray Vespers. If the first, and we receive Holy Communion, we repeatedly express our hope of receiving the Lord by, well, receiving the Lord.
If the second, we join Mary in celebrating the growing child within her, as she does in her Magnificat.
Moreover, since we are not Pelagians, and if we are sober and are convinced that through our own efforts we are incapable of giving rise to anything divine in us, we will also believe that the graces won from attending Mass those days, or praying Vespers, will change us, to make us more receptive to receiving the Child.
Then, everything about Christmas breaks down the barrier between born and unborn. Take the O Antiphons again. Famously, their first initials form an acrostic (Sapientia, Rex, etc.) which if taken backwards spell ero cras. You will hear it said that this means in Latin "tomorrow I will come," as if, "I come into the world."
Not so, it means "tomorrow I will be."
But (you say) He already is: before Abraham was, He is. (John 8:58) Indeed, and therefore it must mean "be for you," that is, become apparent to you, as for instance to the shepherds. Which is to say that in the womb he is saying that tomorrow you will see me, who now is unseen.
The statements about his life made by Zechariah in the "Benedictus," perhaps even in the Lord's presence (if Mary stayed for the circumcision) are all in the past tense - e.g. "he has visited his people." True, this priest is using the so-called "prophetic past" - to refer to something so certain in the future that it must be expressed with the necessity of the past. But at the same time, he is referring to what that two-week-old embryo has already done.
And then, Catholics hold that Mary did not go through labor, and there was no disturbance of the birth canal or of her virginal integrity, so that the infant appeared to us by passing through her body as the Lord was later to pass through walls.

I don't think that anyone ever claimed that someone changed from being a "clump of cells" to being human by walking into a room. Nothing could more clearly show the continuity and identity of born with unborn.
But Christmas tears down other justifications for abortion as well. "Every child a wanted child"? (Please take what I am about to write with appropriate reverence.) Jesus was not a "wanted child" by Mary. This is certain. She believed she would be a virgin. When the angel greeted her, she "was troubled at his saying, and thought with herself what manner of salutation this should be." (Luke 1:29, Douay-Rheims).
She asks, famously, "How shall this be done?" She did not say, "I have been planning to have a child," or "How providential that you arrive just when Joseph and I were thinking that we could afford a child!" But, yes, immediately the child becomes "wanted": "Be it done to me according to thy word." She denies any "autonomy" she might have claimed to have.
We often hear, "Who are you or I to say to a woman that she must accept all the burdens of raising a child?...
Show more...
2 weeks ago
6 minutes 58 seconds

The Catholic Thing
On Santa's Secret Police
By Francis X. Maier
The Mahoney and Maier clans have been best friends for half a century. Our kids - their eight, our four - grew up together and remain close. Kim, the oldest Mahoney sibling, is godfather to our youngest son. A former Marine Corps fighter pilot, he's now an admirable Catholic husband and dad. As a child though, and one with precocious genes; well, that's a different story. Somewhere around the age of reason - seven or so - he asked his mother if there really were a Santa Claus. His mother, a committed truth-teller, said no, but Santa's a beautiful part of the Christmas spirit. To which Kim replied, "If there's no Santa, I don't believe in God either."
This is impressive, if flawed, kid logic. It raises some useful questions about Santa and the entire North Pole propaganda machine.
Consider Elf on a Shelf (hereafter ES). He's a Christmas favorite. The typical marketing copy for ES goes like this: "Ever wonder how Santa crafts his Nice list? Well, Santa has a trusted Scout Elf assigned to every family around the world. He'll find a spot in the family's home to sit and watch all day long. Each night, he'll fly back to report to Santa at the North Pole to tell him all your stories and adventures."
Isn't that sweet? Maybe, but think about it. A skeptic might note that he also reports all your mistakes and failures and bad behavior. The whole ES operation might be subsidized by the coal industry. Worse, Santa's little helper might actually be working for, or at least sharing your personal data with, Krampus, who's quite a different kind of Yuletide creature - it's just a rumor, but where there's smoke, there's usually fire. And isn't it just a bit odd that ES pops up all over the house, uninvited, in the weeks before Christmas with his cute puckish smile, androgynous build, and Aryan blue eyes?
One might reasonably ask: Does jolly old St. Nick really need a branch of Elfdom that functions like the Stasi?
Let's face it: Elf on a Shelf is an ambiguous figure; enigma incarnate. Is he a friend and champion of children everywhere? Or just another minion of consumer capitalism; a servant of grasping Xmas commerce, and arguably a paid informant for unknown interested parties? These are serious questions.
I'll come back to them in a moment. Meanwhile, I have a confession. My wife and I are not just complicit in the Père Noël/Father Christmas/Santa Claus racket. We're veteran agents of the tale; basically a Santa's Workshop agitprop team for decades.

Cleaning out a basement closet earlier this month, we found some 20 years' worth of annual 3'x2' homemade Santa's elf charts - the complete set of North Pole personnel files on our now-adult children. The purpose behind the charts, all those years ago, was simple. Each night starting December 1 through Christmas Eve, Santa's real elves (us) would visit the Maier household and leave a kind of "performance review" - there's no kinder way to put it - on each of our kids.
The kids really got into it. They believed in the elves, or at least pretended to, right up to the brink of junior high. Sure, the December chart sometimes bred sibling grievance and finger-pointing. That's life in a healthy family. But it could also lead, especially in the last week before the Big Day, to modest efforts at conduct reform.
The elves would offer each child some helpful overnight life-coaching in a few scrawled words - Don't bite your brother," etc. - but what really mattered were their five graded categories of daily kid behavior: gold star (wonderful work!), silver star (good job!), green star (ok, but you can do better), red star (you're taking the road less traveled, in the wrong direction), and the dreaded black mark (hope you like coal, kid). Happily, these particular elves were guilty of grade inflation. Black marks were few.
So what's the point of all the above?
Walking with J.R.R. Tolkien in 1931, C.S. Lewis dismissed myths as "lies breathed through silver." Only after his conversion c...
Show more...
2 weeks ago
6 minutes 50 seconds

The Catholic Thing
Annoyed and Frustrated at Mass
By Randall Smith
I am often annoyed and frustrated at Mass. Not with the Mass, mind you. I used to get annoyed and frustrated a lot with the way Mass was done when I first became Catholic. But some of that craziness from earlier years seems to have subsided somewhat. Or maybe it's just that I'm fortunate in the places I go to Mass these days. Mostly, I'm just grateful to be going to Mass at all. A lot of people don't have that luxury, or they risk their lives to go.
No, I get annoyed and frustrated with myself, because my mind wanders. I find that strange and troubling. Strange, because it's Christ Himself present. Troubling, because if I can't get myself to listen to God, then who would I listen to?
I mean, if Christ was present not in the accidents of bread and wine, but as He appeared to the disciples in the upper room after His crucifixion, would my mind wander then? Would I be wondering, "Wow, it's Jesus, but what am I going to have for lunch?" or "These are the words of life, but did I remember to send my students that email?" Would I have to say: "What's that, Lord? What did you say? I'm sorry, my mind wandered." That would be more than a little embarrassing.
The Scriptures are God's own inspired words, but my mind still wanders when I'm listening to them. If God appeared to me in a vision and said, as He did to John the Apostle, "Listen and write this down!" would I be only half-listening and have to ask Him to repeat Himself? Did St. John say, "Wait, God, what was that? I lost my train of thought. I just remembered a funny joke Matthew used to tell."
What kinds of things does my mind wander to? Well, one day, I was kneeling during the consecration, and while my mind was wandering, I thought, "Maybe I should write an article about how my mind wanders at Mass." Now that's just perverse. I thought I heard something the other day about staying awake and "keeping alert." But it's fuzzy, because my mind wandered to what I am going to put on my syllabus next semester.
One thing (among many) I admire about the Byzantine liturgy, which we in the West should consider, is that before the Scripture readings, the priest announces: "Wisdom! Be attentive!" I love that. It's a good reminder.
Maybe in the Western Church, we need a bigger "windup" before the Scripture readings - something that indicates liturgically: "Okay everybody, breathe deeply, shake out the cobwebs, and get your brains in the right space. This is the word of God, so let's all just. . . pay attention!" Perhaps this is the purpose of having preparatory periods like Advent and Lent.

So too, it would be nice if the homily helped us remember the readings. My wife has a points system for homilies, and the priest gets extra points if he mentions all the readings - big points if he mentions the Psalm for the day in the homily, which oddly, almost no one ever does. This is strange because they're always so great, and they are in one of the most commented-upon books of the entire Bible.
But for me, reverence at Mass would be remembering the Lord is here, so pay attention! This is important. This is the key to my whole life. Without this, I'm lost. Everything else is pretty much secondary.
So, what can I say? It's frustrating and annoying. Mass could be done better; that might help. But one lesson of the Scriptures seems to be that, even if Jesus is on top of a hill or out in a boat or walking in a crowd along the street, I should strain my ears and my soul to pay attention. But I don't.
Perhaps the problem is, as T. S. Eliot says, "Humankind cannot bear very much reality." It's true; there are days when I am blown away that the God of all Creation cares enough to speak to us, and it's just a bit much. Wait, He did what? God incarnate touched some guy? He wept? He died on a Cross? Sometimes, it just blows all my circuits.
But, as much as I'd like to say the problem was always bound up with some deep metaphysical awe, the truth is, I don't listen to my neighbors all that...
Show more...
2 weeks ago
6 minutes 4 seconds

The Catholic Thing
An 'Aide-Memoire' for Pope Leo
By Robert Royal
But first a note:
Friends: I want to thank all of you who gave generously to our end-of-year fundraising campaign - for both your material and moral support. It means a great deal to us to hear from you about how much you appreciate our work. We strive to make TCT as good as it can be, every day, 365 days a year. Your encouragement helps keep us at our tasks. And we hope to do even more and even better in the year to come. (As a bit of a foretaste, I've written a more extensive column this morning that I hope will help shape several conversations in the Church, here and abroad, in 2026.) We're in basically good shape financially now, looking ahead, and given the continuing gifts we expect to receive between now to the end of the year. So thanks to all our readers, donors and not, for keeping TCT alive and flourishing. Keep reading. Spread the word about The Catholic Thing.
Now for today's column...
Offering advice to a pope is a presumptuous thing - for anyone. In the Church of synodality, however, where everyone is supposed to have a voice - and be listened to - perhaps not so presumptuous as once upon a time. Still, such counsel should be offered in a spirit of loyalty and concern, as a kind of aide-memoire - in the classic diplomatic sense of providing a leader with information and analysis. Not about dogmas, Creeds, and long-settled matters such as any pope should already know. But as a help in understanding how things, important things, stand, which a pontiff may not be adequately aware of, shaped as he is by what the French elegantly call a déformation professionelle, and what we Americans, more technologically minded, regard as an "information silo."
So let me embark on this diplomatic task, just as a personal exercise (as if one had been asked), made slightly more complicated by the fact that Pope Leo is an American who has mostly lived abroad for much of his adult life. And half-sees, perhaps half doesn't, what I'm about to say.
I start from the recent controversy over the relationship between Europe and America, because it's about much more than politics - and is revealing. I'm in perfect agreement with the pope's recent remarks that the Transatlantic Alliance is of the utmost importance. And I concur that some of the ways that the Trump Administration has couched its recent National Security Strategy (NSS) might give an unsympathetic or hasty reader the impression that America is about to give up on Europe.
But this would be to overlook a deeper commitment to Europe, indeed to something cultural and - dare one say - religious, far more important than political, economic, and military policies, which come and go. As the NSS says early in a section titled "What Do We Want": "We want to support our allies in preserving the freedom and security of Europe, while restoring Europe's civilizational self-confidence and Western identity." (Emphasis added.) And, therefore, what the NSS is seeking to promote, as well as to warn about, is - more properly understood - something about which the Roman Pontiff himself should be concerned. Deeply.
Where the NSS is critical of "Europe," it's mostly speaking of the progressive and unaccountable European Commission, which is the real policy-maker in the European Union. The EU is a body developed over decades in the aftermath of the disaster of World War II with the hope of forever banishing such intra-European destruction. And to a large degree and for a long time, it worked, thanks to the influence of three heroic Catholic figures: Konrad Adenauer in Germany, Robert Schuman in France, and Alcide de Gasperi in Italy (the latter two now up for formal sainthood, not just for their political contributions, but the holiness of their lives).
And behind them all stood the Christian Democracy elaborated by the great Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain, which exposed and rebutted the anti-human principles of the twentieth-century totalitarianisms - Communism, Fascism, Nazis...
Show more...
2 weeks ago
11 minutes 10 seconds

The Catholic Thing
Our "Confinement"
By Fr. Robert P. Imbelli
If memory serves (an increasingly dubious supposition), my theatrical debut occurred in the first grade, when I played an elderly Civil War veteran. My opening lines ran: "Here it is Decoration Day, and I'm confined to my bed, too old to be in the parade." Having now attained eighty plus seven, it's probably prudent to inform a younger generation that "Decoration Day" was the name of the holiday we now celebrate as "Memorial Day." Decoration Day received its name from the practice of decorating the graves of those who had served their country and paid the ultimate price.
But what evoked the eighty-year-old memory was the word that lingered on the tongue of a seven-year-old: "confined." At the time, it probably elicited associations with measles or whooping cough and being unhappily "confined" to bed, though, happily, excused from school. Now, living in a retirement residence, the associations are rather with walkers, wheelchairs, and hospital stays - less pleasant prospects and confinements.
But even these pale before the "confinement" recalled in today's gospel for the Third Sunday of Advent. John the Baptist, confined in prison, straitened, physically and spiritually, poses the anguished question: "Are you the one who is to come, or should we look for another?" (Matthew 11:3)
"Confinement" bears the sense of being "bordered," "limited," set within "boundaries." In this sense we are all "confined:" by physical abilities, natural endowments, ultimately, by our common mortality. As the psalmist ruefully concedes: "The years of our life are threescore and ten, or even fourscore if we are strong. . .but they are soon gone and we fly away." (Psalm 90:10)
Of course, we, sons and daughters of Adam and Eve, all too often rebel against limits and restrictions, against mortality. Ernest Becker's The Denial of Death remains, even after fifty years, a pellucid diagnosis of our personal and cultural plight. We are enthralled by the insinuation: "You will not die. . .you will be like God." (Genesis 3:4-5)
So, we strive to snatch the fruit that promises unending life, limitless possibility, mastery of our destiny. Dante memorably depicts the three beasts - lustful desire, unbridled power, frenzy for fame - that tantalize and allure us by their spurious promise, even as they derail our journey to true life.
It takes no great imaginative skill to picture their prominent contemporary embodiments. They are featured daily, though diversely, on Fox and CNN. It takes more probing discernment to confess one's own complicity. So, we too implore with the psalmist: "teach us to number our days, that we may attain wisdom of heart." (Psalm 90:12)
Yet considering "confinement" more closely may yield further insight. The word might slyly contain its own reversal. There is, for instance, that strangely suggestive "con." Together we share limits; we border one another; we are bound tightly to each other. Confined, we rub shoulders one against the other - for weal and woe. "Aye, there's the rub!" Or the solution. Perhaps even an opening to salvation.

Confined, we appear diminished, reduced, solitary. Solitary confinement is a frightening facsimile of Hell. But break the word apart and a transforming reality may appear. "Con-finis:" a common end. We share together a goal, a purpose, not by nature, but by sheer grace. The grace of him who is to come; indeed, who is ever coming: the Christ of God.
"But who may abide the day of his coming? And who can stand when he appeareth?" (Malachi 3:2) And even Handel's dulcet tones cannot soften the starkness of the query.
"Go, announce to John what you see and hear: blind see, lame walk, lepers are cleansed. Even the dead come to life, while good news reaches the poor. And truly blessed is the one who does not find me scandalous."
The true scope of the scandal has only begun to be revealed on this Advent Sunday. We must first traverse this season of expectation and the mysterious wonder of Chr...
Show more...
2 weeks ago
7 minutes 12 seconds

The Catholic Thing
The Catholic Thing is a daily column rooted in the richest cultural tradition in the world, i.e., the concrete historical reality of Catholicism.