Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, uncensored interviews that expose what really goes on behind the headlines: 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What happens when a reality TV contestant calls out the hypocrisy of the industry that cancelled him? In this explosive episode of Heretics, George Gilbert — the Big Brother contestant removed from the house after alleged “offensive behaviour” — sits down with Andrew Gold to finally tell his story. And this time, he’s naming names. George opens up about what really happened inside the Big Brother house — and why he believes Celeb Big Brother stars Danny Beard and Danny Potts are guilty of the same double standards the show pretends to condemn. From selective outrage to producer manipulation, George argues that Big Brother has become less about social experimentation and more about moral posturing for ratings. Andrew presses him on every controversial point: What exactly happened between George and the celebrity contestants? Are TV personalities preaching tolerance while practising exclusion? How does the show decide who gets “redeemed” and who gets cancelled? And is Big Brother now an ideological battleground instead of a reality show? George doesn’t hold back. He describes what it’s like to be judged by the same people who, off-camera, say and do the very things they claim to condemn. He argues that the modern entertainment industry has lost its authenticity — trading truth for virtue signalling and genuine debate for performative outrage. This isn’t a PR rehab interview — it’s a candid, uncomfortable, and revealing look at what happens when reality TV meets the culture war. Whether you agree with George or not, his story forces a question: how honest are the people calling others “problematic”? 💬 Tell us in the comments: Do you think George is right about the hypocrisy — or is he just trying to clear his name? Hit Subscribe for more fearless Heretics interviews with people who dare to call out double standards — and keep being a heretic. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb5u1XrInaw #GeorgeGilbert #BigBrother #HereticsPodcast #AndrewGold #DannyBeard #DannyPotts #CancelCulture #RealityTV #Hypocrisy #MediaControversy #FreeSpeech #CultureWar #HereticsClips

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, evidence-led interviews that challenge media orthodoxy: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Is Greta Thunberg a grassroots truth-teller—or the most effective PR product of our time? In this explosive Heretics conversation, journalist and author Ashley Rindsberg joins Andrew Gold to argue that much of Greta’s global aura is the result of carefully engineered narratives, compliant media, and platforms like Wikipedia that can tilt the record in real time. Rindsberg lays out how reputations are manufactured, protected, and weaponised—and why, in his view, the public rarely sees the full picture. Inside the episode, Ashley breaks down: 👉 How editorial gatekeeping and “reliable sources” policies can sanitize criticism and amplify praise 👉 The pipeline from activist talking points to headline “consensus,” and why debate gets framed as “denial” 👉 How paid editing/PR laundering and talk-page “consensus” can freeze critical details on Wikipedia 👉 Why Google results and AI training data then recycle that slant across the entire web 👉 Simple checks to verify before you believe: read Talk pages, compare diffs, triangulate sources, follow the PR money Andrew’s calm, forensic style keeps the discussion on receipts, process, and accountability—not ad hominem. Expect a rigorous look at the climate-activism media complex: how funding flows shape coverage, how labels like “misinformation” police the discourse, and how reputations harden into unchallengeable myths. Whether you admire Greta or question her brand, this interview asks the uncomfortable questions: Who writes the story? Who benefits? And what happens to dissenters who try to edit the narrative? If you’ve ever trusted a Wikipedia summary, a Google knowledge panel, or an influencer’s “organic” rise, this conversation will change how you read the internet—and how you judge power. Editorial note: The episode presents Ashley Rindsberg’s analysis and opinions for public-interest debate. Watch, share, and tell us where you stand. #AshleyRindsberg #GretaThunberg #Heretics #AndrewGold #Wikipedia #MediaBias #PR #InformationWarfare #SearchBias #AITrainingData #Censorship #FreeSpeech #ClimateDebate #Disinformation

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, evidence-led interviews that challenge media orthodoxy: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Is Greta Thunberg a grassroots truth-teller—or the most effective PR product of our time? In this explosive Heretics conversation, journalist and author Ashley Rindsberg joins Andrew Gold to argue that much of Greta’s global aura is the result of carefully engineered narratives, compliant media, and platforms like Wikipedia that can tilt the record in real time. Rindsberg lays out how reputations are manufactured, protected, and weaponised—and why, in his view, the public rarely sees the full picture. Inside the episode, Ashley breaks down: 👉 How editorial gatekeeping and “reliable sources” policies can sanitize criticism and amplify praise 👉 The pipeline from activist talking points to headline “consensus,” and why debate gets framed as “denial” 👉 How paid editing/PR laundering and talk-page “consensus” can freeze critical details on Wikipedia 👉 Why Google results and AI training data then recycle that slant across the entire web 👉 Simple checks to verify before you believe: read Talk pages, compare diffs, triangulate sources, follow the PR money Andrew’s calm, forensic style keeps the discussion on receipts, process, and accountability—not ad hominem. Expect a rigorous look at the climate-activism media complex: how funding flows shape coverage, how labels like “misinformation” police the discourse, and how reputations harden into unchallengeable myths. Whether you admire Greta or question her brand, this interview asks the uncomfortable questions: Who writes the story? Who benefits? And what happens to dissenters who try to edit the narrative? If you’ve ever trusted a Wikipedia summary, a Google knowledge panel, or an influencer’s “organic” rise, this conversation will change how you read the internet—and how you judge power. Editorial note: The episode presents Ashley Rindsberg’s analysis and opinions for public-interest debate. Watch, share, and tell us where you stand. #AshleyRindsberg #GretaThunberg #Heretics #AndrewGold #Wikipedia #MediaBias #PR #InformationWarfare #SearchBias #AITrainingData #Censorship #FreeSpeech #ClimateDebate #Disinformation

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, good-faith debates that mainstream TV won’t touch: 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What should justice look like after the killing of Charlie Kirk? In this intense, tightly argued episode, death-row lawyer Clive Stafford-Smith explains why he believes the death penalty is the wrong answer—even in the most emotionally charged cases. Drawing on decades defending people facing execution, Clive challenges the idea that capital punishment delivers safety, closure, or fairness. Expect sharp pushback, uncomfortable hypotheticals, and clear, testable claims. We dig into the questions everyone’s asking but few can answer clearly: • Does capital punishment deter violence—or just satisfy a desire for retribution? • What actually serves victims’ families: years of appeals, or swift certainty without executions? • How often do wrongful convictions, prosecutorial errors, and bias contaminate capital cases? • If not the death penalty, then what? Whole-life terms, restorative options, or evidence-based prevention? • What would a victim-first justice system fund tomorrow: investigations, witness protection, mental-health triage, community risk management? Clive also lays out the hard numbers on cost, error rates, and outcomes, and explains why countries that moved away from executions didn’t slide into chaos. He argues that credible accountability and fewer future victims should be the north star—not media headlines or political point-scoring. Whether you agree or not, you’ll leave with a sharper understanding of the trade-offs: deterrence vs. justice, punishment vs. prevention, emotion vs. evidence. 💬 Join the discussion below: If you were writing policy today, what single reform would most reduce future harm—tougher sentences, smarter monitoring, or expanding prevention and support for at-risk communities? Hit Subscribe for more uncompromising conversations with thinkers who don’t play it safe—then share this episode with someone who disagrees with you. That’s how ideas get tested. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0CQVL46Wj0&t=26s #CliveStaffordSmith #DeathPenalty #HereticsPodcast #AndrewGold #Justice #PublicSafety #CapitalPunishment #LawAndPolicy #VictimsRights #EvidenceBasedPolicy #Debate #LongformConversation

Subscribe to Heretics Clips here 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What would you do if one tweet ended your career in one of the world’s biggest bands? Former Mumford & Sons banjo player Winston Marshall joins Heretics to reveal, in his own words, why he walked away from global fame — and how a single moment of honesty turned his life upside down. This is the uncensored truth about the controversy that shook the music world. Winston opens up about the backlash he faced after expressing his political opinions on BLM and Antifa, the tsunami of social media outrage that followed, and how the fallout began to strain his relationship with his bandmates. In this powerful interview, we dig into: The tweet that sparked an international firestorm How public pressure forced him to choose between his values and his career Why he believes cancel culture is dangerous for artists and free speech The behind-the-scenes tension inside Mumford & Sons during the controversy Life after leaving one of the most successful folk-rock bands of all time How he rebuilt his career and voice outside the music industry spotlight 💥 This is not the PR spin. It’s the real story — raw, reflective, and at times explosive. Whether you agree with Winston or not, you’ll see a side of the music industry that rarely makes the headlines. 👉 Was leaving Mumford & Sons the biggest risk of his life… or his only option? 👉 What did his bandmates say behind closed doors? 👉 And does he regret speaking out? Winston talks candidly about fame, freedom of speech, and the personal cost of standing by your beliefs in today’s cultural climate. 📺 Watch the full conversation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkLJeJbPies If you want more Heretics interviews with truth-tellers, free-thinkers, and controversial voices, subscribe now to Heretics Clips and never miss an episode. #WinstonMarshall #MumfordAndSons #HereticsPodcast #CancelCulture #BLM #Antifa #FreeSpeech #MusicIndustry #FolkRock #Controversy #BritishMusic #TruthTellers #HereticsClips

👉 Subscribe now to Heretics Clips for more unfiltered, no-holds-barred conversations: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos “Why I am SUING Nigel Farage & Reform – It’ll Get NASTY” – Rupert Lowe Why is Rupert Lowe preparing to sue Nigel Farage and Reform UK? In this explosive interview with Andrew Gold, Rupert Lowe breaks his silence on the bitter internal battles within Reform — and warns that things are about to get nasty. Lowe, a businessman, former MEP, and outspoken critic of Britain’s political elite, claims that Reform UK has betrayed its own promises of transparency, trust, and integrity. And at the centre of this storm sits Nigel Farage, the party’s figurehead. What went wrong between the two men who once shared a vision for political reform? Lowe lays it bare. 🚨 Inside this interview, Rupert Lowe reveals: Why he is ready to take Nigel Farage and Reform to court The betrayal and dishonesty that pushed him to legal action How internal party feuds are undermining Reform’s credibility Why Reform UK risks becoming the very thing it claims to oppose What the public needs to know about its leadership and future But this isn’t just about personal grievances. Lowe argues that his clash with Reform exposes a wider truth: that Britain’s political movements, even those promising change, are vulnerable to corruption, self-interest, and betrayal from within. If Reform cannot hold itself together, how can it claim to lead the country? 👀 What exactly did Nigel Farage and Reform do to provoke a lawsuit? 🔥 Is Rupert Lowe exposing uncomfortable truths the party wants hidden? ❓ Could this legal battle be the beginning of Reform’s downfall? This is one of the most controversial and revealing interviews Rupert Lowe has ever given. If you want to understand the tensions tearing Reform apart, the stakes of Lowe’s legal challenge, and what it means for Britain’s political future, this is essential viewing. 🎥 Watch the FULL podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2Sc1JfB-Gw&t=1874s #RupertLowe #NigelFarage #ReformUK #HereticsClips #BritishPolitics #PoliticalScandal

👉 Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless conversations that expose hypocrisy and challenge groupthink: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos When Salman Rushdie faced a fatwa after publishing The Satanic Verses, it was a defining moment for free speech in Britain. But decades later, has Labour — or the wider political class — learned anything? According to Tom Slater, editor of Spiked, the answer is a resounding no. In this fiery Heretics episode, Andrew Gold and Tom Slater dive deep into the failures of Labour and the Left to defend free expression in the age of identity politics and Islamo-woke cultural capture. Instead of standing with writers like Rushdie, Labour has increasingly sided with the forces of censorship, appeasement, and ideological conformity. 🔥 Inside this interview, you’ll uncover: Why Salman Rushdie’s fatwa still matters today — and what it reveals about the cowardice of Britain’s elites. How Labour abandoned universal free speech in favour of pandering to identity blocs. The disturbing alliance between Labour and the Greens that normalises anti-free speech rhetoric. Why figures like Graham Linehan and Rylan Clark find themselves at the sharp end of cancel culture. How multiculturalism, once sold as inclusion, has morphed into a tool for silencing criticism. The media’s complicity — from Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart to Sopel & Maitlis — in protecting progressive dogmas. What this cultural shift means for ordinary people who just want honesty, debate, and common sense in politics. This is not just about Rushdie — it’s about the future of free speech in Britain. If the lessons of the fatwa have been ignored, what dangers lie ahead? Tom Slater and Andrew Gold dismantle the myths, expose the double standards, and reveal why Labour’s failure to stand up for free thought is so dangerous. If you care about freedom, truth, and resisting the creeping tide of censorship, this is the conversation you can’t afford to miss. 📺 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY-CqsGNpEA #SalmanRushdie #LabourParty #TomSlater #Heretics #AndrewGold #HereticsPodcast #Fatwa #FreeSpeech #CancelCulture #IdentityPolitics #IslamoWoke #UKPolitics #CultureWar #SpikedOnline #GreenParty #PoliticalHypocrisy #UKLabour #ProgressivePolitics

What if the man the media branded as the “face of racism” actually hates racists? In this explosive interview, Tommy Robinson sets the record straight — and exposes what the BBC already knows but refuses to admit. For more raw and unfiltered conversations that challenge the official narrative, subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Robinson has long been one of Britain’s most controversial figures. For years, the press painted him as a dangerous extremist, a bogeyman to be feared. But is that image based on truth — or on a carefully constructed smear campaign? In this conversation, filmed at his hidden location abroad, Robinson breaks down who he really is, what he really believes, and why the establishment is so desperate to silence him. Far from embracing racism, Robinson declares in no uncertain terms: he despises racists. So why does the media continue to ignore this? Could it be that acknowledging it would unravel the story they’ve been selling for years? And if the BBC knows this truth, why do they continue to push the same tired narrative? There has been a growing reappraisal of Robinson in recent years, with public intellectuals like Douglas Murray and Jordan Peterson praising aspects of his work and courage. Once dismissed as a fringe agitator, he’s now being seen by some as a truth-teller exposing what others are too afraid to say — on topics like immigration, radical Islam, and political correctness. This is Robinson as you’ve never seen him before: candid, reflective, and unflinching. Whether you agree with him or not, his words raise urgent questions about free speech, censorship, and the role of the media in modern Britain. Why does the establishment work so hard to silence dissent? What truths are being buried in the name of “tolerance”? And can Britain really call itself free if voices like Robinson’s are demonised rather than debated? 👉 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiBsZErTk7Y&t=4s 👉 Subscribe to Heretics Clips for more fearless interviews that strip away the spin and reveal what’s really going on. #TommyRobinson #BBC #Immigration #Islam #AntiWoke #HereticsClips

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for raw, unfiltered conversations with icons who actually say what they think. In this episode, Robbie Williams tells Andrew Gold why he can’t write another “Angels”—and what happens to an artist when a single song becomes a shadow you can’t step out of. Watch to hear the pressure, the fear, the craft, and the truth behind the hit that defined a generation. Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Why does creative lightning strike once—and why is it so hard to summon again on command? Robbie pulls back the curtain on the alchemy of songwriting: the accident, the obsession, and the timing you can’t fake. He talks candidly about chasing that same transcendence and the uncomfortable reality that audiences expect miracles on schedule. Is the next classic one honest verse away—or is trying to top a masterpiece the surest way to kill it? Robbie opens up about the strange bargain of fame: how adoration and ridicule arrive in the same breath, why he still doomscrolls the comments, and how that noise creeps into the studio. He speaks about anxiety, ADHD, and the creative rituals that keep him writing when the stakes feel impossibly high. You’ll hear the difference between making a hit and making something true—and why he’s choosing truth. We revisit the early days—Take That, the breakout, the solo leap—then sit with the artist he is now: older, funnier, sharper, and more self-aware. He unpacks ego, faith, and the nagging inner voice asking, “Was ‘Angels’ the peak—or just one chapter?” Expect stories, jokes, and moments of naked honesty that only Robbie can deliver. If you’ve ever wondered how stars live with their greatest work—or how creative people keep going after the world crowns one song “the one”—this is the conversation you’ll replay. Part confession, part craft masterclass, and completely Heretical. 🎧 Watch the full interview and tell us what “Angels” means to you. #RobbieWilliams #Angels #HereticsPodcast #HereticsClips #AndrewGold #Songwriting #MusicIndustry #ADHD #MentalHealth #Fame #CelebrityCulture #BritishPop #TakeThat

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, unfiltered conversations that dig beneath the headlines: 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What does it really take to get kicked off Big Brother in 2025? In this explosive Heretics interview, George Gilbert — the contestant ejected from the show after a viral controversy — finally tells his side of the story. Accused of making a “controversial comment” that crossed the line, George explains exactly what was said, how the producers handled it, and why he believes the show has become a reflection of a society terrified of open conversation. George pulls no punches. He reveals what life inside the house was truly like — the constant surveillance, the performative politics, and the feeling that one wrong sentence could end your career. But is that fair? Andrew Gold presses him on every angle: what was actually said, what he meant by it, and whether he regrets it. Was this a genuine mistake, or another case of cancel culture spiralling out of control? We dive into the bigger questions: • Has Big Brother become a moral court instead of a social experiment? • Do producers engineer outrage for ratings, then disown the fallout? • Is free speech still possible in entertainment — or has everything become a trap for public shaming? • And what does this say about Britain’s wider culture of offence and fear in 2025? This is not a rant — it’s a raw, revealing look at what happens when reality TV collides with modern outrage. George opens up about the pressure, the aftermath, and what happens when the country you entertained suddenly turns against you. 💬 Tell us in the comments: Was Big Brother right to remove George, or has censorship gone too far? Hit Subscribe for more fearless Heretics conversations with people who challenge the mainstream — and keep being a heretic. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb5u1XrInaw #GeorgeGilbert #BigBrother #HereticsPodcast #AndrewGold #CancelCulture #FreedomOfSpeech #RealityTV #MediaControversy #FreeExpression #HereticsClips #Censorship #OutrageCulture #Debate #ControversialInterview

👉 Subscribe now to Heretics Clips for bold, unfiltered conversations that challenge everything you think you know about morality, justice, and power. https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What does it feel like to watch someone die — legally? In this gripping episode, human rights lawyer Clive Stafford-Smith takes us inside the haunting world of death row. Having defended some of the most notorious prisoners in America, Clive has witnessed the unthinkable: the execution of a man he believed was innocent. 💥 In this conversation: The horrifying reality of witnessing an execution in the electric chair. What it’s like to look into the eyes of a condemned man moments before death. How Clive copes with the psychological toll of trying — and failing — to save lives. Why he believes the death penalty is not just unjust, but evil. The moral cost of a justice system that kills in the name of law and order. Clive Stafford-Smith isn’t just any lawyer. He’s one of the most fearless human rights defenders alive today — the founder of Reprieve and a man who has spent his life fighting state-sanctioned killing. But in this raw, emotional conversation, he opens up about the times he lost. About the men he couldn’t save. About the nightmares that never go away. This isn’t a polite debate — it’s a confrontation with death, conscience, and the very idea of justice. Clive and I clash on everything from faith to punishment to whether some crimes ever deserve mercy. But through that tension comes something rare: an honest look at what it means to be human in a system built to destroy. ⚖️ What would you do if you had to defend someone everyone else called a monster? 💭 And could you live with yourself if the state killed them anyway? 👇 Let me know in the comments what you would have asked Clive. And if you believe in fearless, uncomfortable truth — subscribe to Heretics Clips for more conversations that dig where others stay silent. 🎧 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0CQVL46Wj0&t=26s #CliveStaffordSmith #DeathPenalty #Execution #HereticsPodcast #HumanRights #ElectricChair #CapitalPunishment #JusticeSystem #WrongfulConviction

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, good-faith interviews that others won’t touch: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What really happened behind the headlines of Haut de la Garenne and other historic UK abuse scandals? In this gripping Heretics conversation, former Scotland Yard detective and whistleblower Jon Wedger sits down with Andrew Gold to share his first-hand perspective on how sensitive cases are opened, built—and, in his view, too often quietly stalled. Focusing strictly on Wedger’s testimony, this episode explores the contested history surrounding high-profile allegations (including those linked in the public domain to former Prime Minister Ted Heath), and the cultural forces Jon says make accountability so hard. Inside the interview, Jon explains: 👉 How investigations move from tip-off to intel to evidence, and where he believes process breaks down 👉 Why jurisdictional gaps, siloed teams and reputational risk can derail momentum 👉 The warning signs professionals and the public should recognise—online and offline 👉 What whistleblowers, he says, face inside institutions: reassignments, reputational smears, and pressure to “stand down” 👉 Practical fixes: independent oversight, better data-sharing, victim-first safeguarding, and real protections for officers who raise concerns Andrew’s calm, forensic style keeps the conversation on facts, procedure and paper trails, not sensationalism. Wedger walks through casework mechanics, reflects on months where he says he identified scores of suspects, and outlines reforms he believes would actually help victims while restoring trust in policing and media. Whether you agree with his conclusions or challenge them, you’ll hear a rare, practitioner-level look at how complex investigations unfold—and why some lines of inquiry, he argues, simply fade without explanation. This may be one of the most urgent and uncomfortable Heretics episodes yet: precise, procedural and relentlessly focused on safeguarding and accountability. If you care about institutional integrity, historical truth, and protecting the vulnerable, this conversation will test assumptions and raise difficult—but necessary—questions. Editorial note: All claims discussed are presented as Jon Wedger’s allegations and opinions for public-interest discussion. Viewers are encouraged to examine available evidence and make up their own minds. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFSBxf4YWrA&t=3091s #JonWedger #Heretics #AndrewGold #HautDeLaGarenne #TedHeath #UKPolicing #Whistleblower #Safeguarding #InvestigativeJournalism #BritishEstablishment #HistoricalAllegations #Accountability #CSE

🔥 Something is seriously wrong with Britain. In this explosive Heretics interview, Charlie Downes of Restore Britain (Rupert Lowe's movement) warns that what’s coming will be WORSE than a civil war. From mass immigration and identity politics to grooming gangs, tribalism, and the collapse of English identity – is the UK sleepwalking into disaster? In this conversation, Charlie Downes and Andrew Gold explore whether Britain can survive the cultural rot, political corruption, and social fragmentation that threaten to tear the country apart. Is Nigel Farage the answer? Can Reform UK or Restore Britain offer a way out? Or are we already on a path towards inevitable violence and breakdown? If you care about free speech, immigration, English identity, or the future of Britain – this is a must-watch. 💬 What do you think – is Britain heading for collapse, civil conflict, or renewal? Drop your thoughts below. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpByhkLiG48 #civilwar #hereticspodcast #andrewgold

MET Police Tried to Turn Me Into an Undercover "ASSET" – Tommy Robinson What happens when the police secretly try to recruit you as an undercover asset? In this explosive interview, Tommy Robinson reveals how the MET Police attempted to manipulate him, why he refused, and what it says about the state of free speech and policing in Britain today. For more raw, unfiltered interviews that challenge the mainstream narrative, subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos For decades, Tommy Robinson has been one of the most controversial figures in Britain. To some, he was painted as the face of racism. To others, he has been a whistleblower exposing uncomfortable truths about immigration, Islamism, and the failures of the political establishment. But now, with praise from intellectual heavyweights like Douglas Murray and Jordan Peterson, Robinson is undergoing a remarkable reappraisal. In this rare, face-to-face conversation — filmed at his hidden location abroad — Robinson lays out his side of the story in a way you’ve never heard before. Why did the MET Police really want him as an “asset”? What secrets did they hope he would reveal? And what does it say about the desperation of the authorities when they turn to one of their fiercest critics for help? The interview doesn’t shy away from controversy. Robinson speaks openly about immigration, radical Islam, policing, and censorship, drawing on his personal experiences at the centre of Britain’s culture wars. Whether you agree with him or not, his account forces you to confront questions the media avoids: Is Britain sacrificing truth for political correctness? How deep does the state’s surveillance and manipulation go? And can free speech survive in an era where dissenting voices are targeted rather than debated? 👉 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiBsZErTk7Y&t=4s 👉 Subscribe to Heretics Clips and hit the bell for more fearless conversations that push past the spin and expose what’s really going on. #TommyRobinson #METPolice #Immigration #Islam #AntiWoke #HereticsClips

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, evidence-led interviews that challenge the gatekeepers: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Is Wikipedia a neutral encyclopedia—or an information chokepoint where inconvenient stories vanish? In this explosive Heretics conversation, journalist and author Ashley Rindsberg joins Andrew Gold to examine what he argues was a coordinated effort to downplay or delete coverage of Iryna Zarutska’s murder on Wikipedia. Rindsberg lifts the lid on how editorial “consensus” is manufactured, how reliable-sources lists can be used to sideline reporting, and why these behind-the-scenes battles matter far beyond one page. Inside the interview, Ashley breaks down the mechanics of narrative control he sees at work: 👉 Talk-page pile-ons and speedy reverts that make contested facts look “settled.” 👉 Deletionism and notability debates that can bury emerging stories before they’re widely reported. 👉 Source deprecation/whitelisting that privileges some outlets while blacklisting others—shaping what counts as “truth.” 👉 How Wikipedia bias can cascade into Google, classrooms, and even AI training data, hard-coding a slanted version of events into the information ecosystem. Andrew’s calm, forensic questioning keeps the focus on receipts, process, and accountability: diffs, noticeboard threads, policy loopholes, and the incentives surrounding a billion-dollar world of PR laundering and paid editing. Rindsberg argues that once an editorial line hardens on Wikipedia, it propagates everywhere—from search snippets to knowledge panels—creating a reputational reality that is extremely difficult to challenge. Whether you see Wikipedia as a public good in need of reform or a captured system, this conversation gives you practical tools to verify before you believe: reading talk pages, comparing page histories, checking for templated warnings, and triangulating sources beyond the encyclopedia. If you’ve ever trusted a Wikipedia summary—or wondered why a story you know is missing—this episode will change how you read the web. Editorial note: The discussion presents Ashley Rindsberg’s analysis and opinions for public-interest debate. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFrfxjb_Iw0&t=1949s #AshleyRindsberg #Wikipedia #IrynaZarutska #Censorship #Heretics #AndrewGold #MediaBias #ReliableSources #Deletionism #InformationIntegrity #SearchBias #AITrainingData #FreeSpeech #Disinformation

Subscribe to Heretics Clips now for explosive interviews that pull no punches: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Why are autistic girls increasingly vulnerable to being drawn into trans activist groups? In this revealing Heretics interview, psychotherapist and Genspect founder Stella O’Malley explains the psychological, social, and cultural factors behind this growing phenomenon. Stella is internationally known for her work challenging aspects of modern gender ideology. As someone who wanted to be a boy when she was young — and is now deeply relieved she didn’t receive puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones — she brings both personal insight and professional expertise to this controversial subject. In this eye-opening conversation, you’ll discover: Why autistic girls are especially susceptible to targeted messaging from trans activist groups. How traits like literal thinking, social isolation, and intense identity searching can make them vulnerable. The tactics used to recruit and affirm these girls before proper psychological assessment is done. Why Stella believes gender-affirming care often ignores deeper mental health issues. The long-term risks of medicalising teenage distress with irreversible interventions. How online communities and social media algorithms fuel rapid-onset gender dysphoria. Stella also discusses her work with Michael Shellenberger and Mia Hughes on the WPATH Files — leaked documents that, she argues, expose a lack of safeguarding and medical accountability in the trans healthcare industry. With her organisation Genspect, Stella advocates for exploratory therapy and a cautious, evidence-based approach — especially for neurodiverse youth who may be struggling with anxiety, depression, or trauma unrelated to gender. This is a frank, challenging, and deeply human conversation that pulls back the curtain on one of the most heated debates of our time. Whether you agree with Stella or not, her perspective on the intersection of autism, adolescence, and gender politics will give you plenty to think about. ➡️ Watch the full interview now and join the discussion in the comments: How should society safeguard autistic girls from ideological targeting? 🎥 Full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2LQBdLSkyQ #gender #antiwoke #heretics #StellaOMalley #Genspect #WPATHFiles #autism #transgenderdebate

🔔 Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless conversations that challenge the mainstream: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Why is the UK media so afraid of Tommy Robinson — and why is a Polish MEP the one brave enough to say it out loud? In this explosive interview on Heretics, Dominik Tarczyński joins Andrew Gold to expose what he calls Britain’s cultural decay, cowardice, and collapse under the weight of political correctness. Tarczyński, one of Europe’s most outspoken politicians, explains why Poland rejected illegal migration, how “tolerance” is being weaponised by woke institutions, and why silencing figures like Tommy Robinson only fuels public anger. From European identity and radical Islam to the media’s moral hypocrisy, he doesn’t hold back — calling out the BBC, Westminster elites, and the UK press for creating what he calls “a nation scared of the truth.” 🔥 What really happens when someone dares to speak against mass immigration? 🔥 Why does Tarczyński believe Poland’s policies could save the West? 🔥 And what’s his message to British leaders who label him “far-right”? This conversation dives deep into the war for Western identity, the crisis of free speech, and what Europe’s future might look like if current trends continue. Whether you agree or disagree with him, Dominik Tarczyński is a voice that demands to be heard — and this episode will leave you questioning what freedom really means in modern Britain. 🎙️ About Dominik Tarczyński A Member of the European Parliament for Poland’s ruling Law and Justice Party, Tarczyński is known globally for his fiery defence of national sovereignty and his viral declaration that Poland would not accept “even one illegal migrant.” His speeches at the European Parliament have made headlines worldwide for their unapologetic stance against woke ideology, censorship, and globalism. 💡 If you’re tired of media spin and censorship, subscribe to Heretics for unfiltered interviews with the world’s most controversial voices. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9phrhrz3gY&t=2385s #DominikTarczynski #TommyRobinson #HereticsPodcast #FreeSpeech #ImmigrationCrisis #AndrewGold #Poland #WokeCulture #UKPolitics

In this explosive interview, Andrew Gold sits down with businessman and politician Rupert Lowe to discuss why he believes Rachel Reeves is bankrupting the country. From reckless economic policies to Britain’s mounting debt crisis, Rupert pulls no punches in exposing what he sees as the dangerous consequences of Reeves’ leadership. If you want more unfiltered conversations like this, make sure you subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Is Rachel Reeves the right person to steer Britain through one of its most turbulent economic periods? Or is she pushing the UK closer to long-term decline? Rupert Lowe argues Reeves is part of a political class that has consistently failed ordinary citizens while protecting the interests of Westminster insiders. Andrew and Rupert go beyond the headlines to ask the uncomfortable questions: Who is really pulling the strings behind Britain’s economic policies? Why are working families paying the price for political incompetence? And can the UK economy survive leaders who prioritise ideology over practical solutions? This is a fiery, controversial conversation that gets to the heart of Britain’s economic and political crisis. Whether you agree or disagree with Rupert Lowe, his perspective on Rachel Reeves and the future of the UK will challenge you to think differently about where the country is heading. 👉 Don’t miss out on more interviews that cut through the noise. Subscribe now to Heretics Clips for bold conversations that expose what the mainstream won’t. #hereticspodcast #rupertlowe #reform #rachelreeves #ukeconomy #andrewgold

Subscribe to Heretics Clips now for explosive interviews that pull no punches: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos How does a teenager living in 1970s Yorkshire, under the shadow of one of Britain’s most infamous serial killers, become a lifelong radical feminist? In this gripping Heretics interview, journalist, author, and activist Julie Bindel reveals how the Yorkshire Ripper murders changed the course of her life — and shaped her commitment to fighting for women’s rights. Bindel, who has spent decades campaigning against male violence, recalls growing up during the Peter Sutcliffe killing spree, when fear gripped communities and women were told to change their behaviour rather than expect protection from the authorities. She explains how the police’s treatment of the victims — and the media’s indifference to women’s safety — lit a fire that turned her into a radical feminist determined to challenge a culture that excuses misogyny. In this candid conversation, you’ll discover: What it was like to live in the epicentre of the Yorkshire Ripper investigation. How victim-blaming shaped public perception of the murders. Why Bindel believes the police failed women during the case. How these events pushed her into a lifetime of activism. The connections she draws between 1970s misogyny and today’s gender politics. Why male violence against women remains her core campaigning focus. Andrew Gold digs into Bindel’s journey from a working-class teenager in Leeds to a leading radical feminist voice. Together, they explore how this early experience of systemic failure still informs her work today — from challenging dangerous offenders being placed in women’s prisons to fighting for sex-based rights in the face of modern ideological battles. Bindel’s story is more than just a personal memoir — it’s a powerful indictment of a justice system that too often sidelines women’s safety. She argues that the lessons from the Yorkshire Ripper era are still painfully relevant, and that ignoring them risks repeating history. Whether you agree with her politics or not, Julie Bindel’s testimony is a raw, urgent reminder of why feminism exists in the first place. ➡️ Watch the full interview now and join the conversation: Do you think society has learned from the Yorkshire Ripper murders — or are women still being failed today? 🎥 Full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WntY0N6ndxY&t=1241s #JulieBindel #Heretics #YorkshireRipper #RadicalFeminism #WomensRights #MaleViolence #FeministActivism #PeterSutcliffe #SexBasedRights

👉 Start by subscribing now to Heretics Clips for fearless conversations the mainstream won’t touch: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos 🔥 Few political figures divide opinion like Margaret Thatcher. Hated by some, revered by others, she remains one of Britain’s most transformative leaders. In this gripping interview, broadcaster, writer, and comedian Mark Dolan makes the provocative case that Thatcher — often branded as “anti-working class” — actually empowered working people, giving them ownership, aspiration, and a renewed sense of nationhood. 👉 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtF-Us3rLGM Mark Dolan, best known for Balls of Steel on Channel 4 and now a sharp voice on GB News, dismantles decades of lazy caricatures about the “Iron Lady.” Instead, he shines a light on how Thatcher’s policies of home ownership, privatisation, and economic liberalisation broke down class barriers and gave millions the chance to control their own destinies. This isn’t the version of Thatcher you’ve been told about in university lecture halls or by the progressive media. This is Thatcher as the unlikely champion of the ordinary Briton, a woman who stood against union dominance, challenged the establishment, and put power back into the hands of individuals rather than elites. In this wide-ranging discussion, Dolan explores: Why Thatcher’s vision of nationhood resonates today more than ever. How her critics often ignore the working-class families who thrived under her leadership. The cultural legacy of Thatcherism — and why it still drives so much of Britain’s political debate. Why the left continues to demonise her, decades after she left office. This is more than just history. It’s about what Thatcher’s Britain means for us now, in an age of globalisation, identity politics, and declining trust in institutions. Dolan asks the big question: Is there anyone today with the courage, conviction, and clarity to do what Thatcher did? 👉 Stay to the end, where Dolan reveals what modern leaders can learn from Thatcher’s boldness — and why he believes her message of individual responsibility and empowerment is the antidote to today’s culture of dependency and division. #MargaretThatcher #MarkDolan #Nationhood #WorkingClass #IronLady #GBNews #AntiWoke #HereticsClips