The internet is full of opinions, and not all of them are kind. This week, Ben and Nathan dig into a reddit thread, reacting to some of the tougher criticisms aimed at the Demon and our co-hosts.
Also in this episode:
- Ben and Nathan react to Washington’s decision to retroactively lower its bar passage score
- A listener asks whether applying Early Decision makes sense for top law schools
- Whether a law school increasing its class size improves your odds of admission
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library
0:00 Making a Last Push on Next LSAT
7:18 Should I Take the LSAT Again?
23:48 Washington Lowering Bar Passage Requirements
42:03 We Read Our Mean Comments
1:03:10 Law Schools Increasing Class Sizes
1:11:22 Can Early Decision Be Beneficial?
1:22:55 Personal Statement Gong Show
1:39:40 Word of the Week — penumbra
The FTC submitted a letter to the Texas Supreme Court supporting its decision to drop the ABA as the state’s official accreditor. Ben and Nathan agree that the ABA has been slow to modernize and often lags behind student needs, but they don’t fully align with the FTC’s reasoning.
Also in this episode:
A listener asks whether to choose a part-time or full-time law program.
Whether to cancel an official score that comes in lower than a prior LSAT.
A personal statement with an unusually bold opening.
Links Mentioned:
FTC Letter to Texas Supreme Court
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library
Questions? help@thinkinglsat.com
0:00 When to Take Practice Tests
6:11 FTC Claims the ABA is a Monopoly
21:43 Full-Time vs. Part-Time Law Programs
29:47 Tips from Departing Demons
35:02 Performing Worse on the First Section
43:19 Cancelling a Lower Score
46:45 Personal Statement Gong Show
Ben and Nathan dig into a striking chart showing dozens of schools clustering their LSAT medians at 150 and 160, while almost nobody reports 149 or 159. They break down why schools chase these round-number medians, how it leads to irrational admissions behavior, and what it means for applicants trying to play the rankings game.
Also in this episode:
- How applying without a GPA can affect your admissions chances
- Success stories from Demon students who crushed the November LSAT
- Why the University of North Carolina has climbed so quickly in the rankings
Links Mentioned:
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library
0:00 Retaking to Beat New Medians
5:37 Applying with No GPA
14:05 November LSAT Success
20:05 The Irrational Pursuit of Round LSAT Medians
27:20 Lower Scores When Timed
34:50 Meeting with an Admissions Counselor
39:35 What’s the Deal with University of North Carolina
55:56 Word of the Week — Prolixity
A listener writes in asking how to handle the pressure of their final official LSAT attempt. Ben and Nathan remind them that their highest score on record, a 165, is already strong enough for full scholarships at many law schools. They encourage the listener to let go of perfectionism, be comfortable with not finishing a section, and approach test day expecting incremental improvement.
Also in this episode:
- An update on an LSAC cheating allegation
- Ben and Nathan react to the ABA lifting its probation of Cooley Law
- Advice from Demon students who recently crushed the LSAT
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library
0:00 Update on Cheating Allegations
5:24 ABA Lifts Probation for Cooley
10:50 How to Approach Your Last Official Attempt
21:44 Tips from Departing Demons
34:25 Chances at a T14 as a Super kJD
41:10 Pearls vs. Turds
43:27 Personal Statement Gong Show
57:12 Word of the Week — Percolation
A listener writes in after a disappointing first round of scholarship offers. Ben and Nathan explain that initial offers are rarely a school’s best, they’re just the starting point. They reassure the listener that more and better offers are still on the way.
Also in this episode:
- Whether taking the January LSAT is too late to apply this cycle
- Questions about Harvard’s Junior Deferral Program
- A deeper look at one of the newest members of the T14: WashU
Links Mentioned:
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library
0:00 - Is the January LSAT Too Late?
23:45 - Receiving Bad Scholarships
35:24 - When Do I Know When I’m Ready?
43:05 - Follow–Up on Cheating
45:18 - Harvard’s Junior Deferral Program
1:07:45 - Demon Team Tracker
1:09:19 - What’s the Deal with… WashU
1:36:54 - Word of the Week — Propinquity
A listener writes in asking whether they should retake a 173, worried that a future attempt could be lower. Ben and Nathan explain why they should be willing to use all four remaining attempts: law schools only care about your highest score, and every point, especially for higher scores, can turn into thousands of dollars.
Also in this episode:
- When applicants can expect scholarship responses from law schools
- Advice from Demon students who crushed the LSAT
- Another brave contestant steps up for the Personal Statement Gong Show
Links Mentioned:
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library
0:00 - Following the Demon Way
3:30 - When Will I Hear Back on Scholarships?
9:31 - Medians Above 4.00
24:25 - Tips from Deparing Demons
31:40 - Should I Retake a 173?
36:35 - Light at the End of the Tunnel
50:56 - Personal Statement Gong Show
1:05:23 - Word of the Week — Anachronism
When LSAC accused a student of cheating, claiming his score jump had “Powerball odds,” Ben and Nathan dig into the details. They break down LSAC’s vague statistical claims and explain why big score increases are both possible and common for serious students. They also urge the student to document their prep to show clear evidence of progress.
Also in this episode:
Early 1L and 2L law firm hiring trends
A student asks whether to keep taking undergrad classes to boost their GPA
Should you ask law schools for an application fee waiver?
Links Mentioned:
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library
0:00 - Is It Ever Worth Paying for Law School?
23:40 - LSAC Accuses a Student of Cheating
49:20 - 1L and 2L Law Firm Hiring Trends
56:37 - Should I Keep Taking Classes?
1:03:37 - Community Colleges Offering A+ Grades
1:09:59 - Pearls vs. Turds
1:15:06 - Should You Ask for a Fee Waiver?
1:19:44 - Word of the Week — Demarcating
Since the October score release, there's been some online chatter claiming the October LSAT was unusually difficult. Nathan and Ben respond to one student's concerns by pointing to numerous Demon students who crushed the LSAT this month. They remind listeners that every test administration sparks the same rumors, but the LSAT remains consistent from one test to the next. That consistency should inspire confidence. If your practice test scores match your goal score, you’re ready for the real deal.
Also in this episode:
- Ben and Nathan explore community colleges awarding A-pluses
- Demon students share their parting advice for LSAT success
- They critique a prep company that promotes a “blind review” score
Links Mentioned:
lsat.link/grades
Northeast Community College Course Search: https://reg-prod.ec.northeast.edu/StudentRegistrationSsb/ssb/term/termSelection?mode=search
Foothill College Course Search: https://foothill.edu/schedule/
Arizona State University Universal Learner Courses: https://courses.ulc.asu.edu/
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments.
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
0:30 - Was the October LSAT Harder?
7:45 - Drill Rating System
12:51 - Colleges with A-pluses
25:32 - Tips From Departing Demons
39:24 - Blind Review Score
53:08 - Lived Experience Essay
1:00:00 - Personal Statement Gong Show
1:07:55 - Word of the Week — incommunicado
Nathan and Ben highlight a notable increase in law school applications per the latest LSAC reports. These numbers have nervous students rushing to apply this cycle, even though they don't have a strong LSAT score. Nathan and Ben explain that November is already late. Instead, they encourage applicants to wait and apply next year to take advantage of the best scholarship opportunities.
Also in this episode:
Links Mentioned:
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” Segments.
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
0:30 - LSAC Volume Summary Report
10:10 - Following the Demon Philosophy
17:13 - When to Submit Applications
29:56 - Email from a Law School on Loan Limits
44:46 - Low LSAT Scores
51:27 - What’s the Deal with the University of Arizona
1:05:00 - Personal Statement Gong Show
1:12:28 - Word of the Week - impervious
Ben and Nathan explain why applying broadly maximizes admissions and scholarship opportunities. They advise students to consider waiting another cycle to submit the strongest application possible.
Also in this episode:
Links Mentioned:
Register for the Los Angeles LSAC Forum: http://lsac.org/lawschoolforums
Watch Episode 529 on YouTube
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments.
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
0:30 - Reading Every Passage Thoroughly
7:26 - “Where Have You Applied?” on Law School Apps
10:18 - Is It Still Worth Applying?
23:16 - Tips from Departing Demons
24:53 - To Waive, or Not to Waive
30:00 - What’s the Deal with Santa Clara Law?
51:02 - Personal Statement Gong Show
1:14:38 - Word of the Week - Guffaw
Ben and Nathan weigh in on New England Law’s conditional, full-tuition scholarships. They criticize conditional scholarships that can leave a majority of students paying full price. At most law schools, only top students (typically those already with scholarships) will secure six-figure jobs. The majority of the class foot the bill, taking out exorbitant loans while earning significantly less after graduation. Ben and Nathan encourage applicants to apply broadly and attend the right school at the right price.
Later in the show, they:
Break down UC Law San Francisco’s new $100 million campaign
Reassure a student who fears they’re progressing too slowly
React to WashU personally contacting applicants’ recommenders
Links Mentioned:
Register for the New York LSAC Forum
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” Segments.
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
0:32 - UC Law San Francisco $100 Million “Into the Future” Campaign
6:00 - Trusting the Process
13:48 - WashU Reaching out to Recommenders
29:30 - Policies on AI
39:15 - Caught Between Admissions Cycles
45:20 - Pearls vs. Turds
57:24 - What’s the Deal with New England Law?
1:13:05 - Personal Statement Gong Show
1:35:30 - Word of the Week
Ben and Nathan dig into the ABA’s decision to put Cooley Law School on probation and the broader issue of weak oversight in legal education. They also cover addenda for multiple LSAT scores, early acceptances, and retaking for better scholarships.
0:28 - Cooley Law on Probation by the ABA
Ben and Nathan react to the news that Cooley Law has been placed on probation by the American Bar Association for failing to meet bar passage standards. They question why the ABA continues to allow such programs to operate and highlight the risks for students who enroll in them.
24:45 - Addenda for LSAT retakes
Demon student Sam asks about Michigan Law’s recommendation that applicants submit an addendum if they’ve taken the LSAT three or more times. Nathan advises against volunteering information that could hurt an application and emphasizes that only your highest score matters.
37:43 - Early Application Is Key
A Redditor reports being admitted to the University of Hawaii with a generous scholarship. Ben and Nathan use the example to remind applicants that applying early gives them the best shot at admissions and scholarships.
57:09 - Retaking a 173 for Scholarships
Demon student Jack scored a 173 and wonders whether it’s worth retaking. Ben and Nathan say yes, especially if he’s targeting top schools. They advise him to wait another cycle and keep studying to become a stronger, more competitive applicant.
1:06:20 - UGA Law Lets Undergrads Skip the LSAT
The University of Georgia Law School now allows its undergraduates to apply using ACT or SAT scores instead of the LSAT. Nathan argues that this limits students to only UGA Law and weakens their scholarship leverage. Ben adds that the policy ultimately does a disservice to the students.
1:12:41 - Georgetown Law Group Interview
Demon student Jeremiah describes a Georgetown group interview where participants analyzed a hypothetical applicant. Ben and Nathan break down how to handle this kind of exercise: play along with the scenario, and show reasonable judgment.
1:20:11 - Personal Statement Gong Show
Casey takes the stage on the Personal Statement Gong Show, chasing Sophia’s record of 34 lines.
1:38:17 - Word of the Week: Dispositive
“The panel directed counsel to focus oral argument on the dispositive issues.”
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
Santa Clara Law is offering every admitted student a $16,000 scholarship to align tuition with the new federal loan cap for law school borrowers. Ben and Nathan discuss whether loan caps can rein in skyrocketing tuition, share wisdom from a departing Demon user, unpack the University of Miami’s AI essay prompt, and offer reassurance to students stressed by LSAT scheduling woes.
0:26 - Santa Clara Scholarships
Nathan and Ben react to Santa Clara Law’s new PLEDGE scholarship, which effectively lowers tuition to just under the $50,000 federal loan cap. Borrowing limits are a step in the right direction for controlling law school costs.
24:04 - Tips from a Departing Demon
Demon student Abigail, who improved her LSAT from 159 to 176, offers a parting piece of advice: take breaks. She encourages students to let the material settle and give themselves time to recharge. Nathan and Ben highlight her success as proof that steady, balanced preparation works.
28:34 - University of Miami AI Essay Prompt
Demon teacher Beatriz highlights Miami Law’s unusual essay prompt that requires applicants to use generative AI. Nathan and Ben credit the school for recognizing AI’s growing role in lawyering and suggest other schools should follow suit.
36:06 - Scheduling Woes Strike Again
A Reddit user vents about not finding a time slot for the October LSAT. Nathan reassures students that LSAC always opens more seats.
38:21 - Letters of Recommendation
Two listeners ask for advice on letters of recommendation:
Morgan debates which supervisor to ask for a letter of recommendation. Ben and Nathan recommend choosing the one who knows Morgan best.
Abo wonders if decade-old letters of recommendation can still be used to apply to law schools. The guys advise Abo to get updated letters.
47:51 - “Should I Stay or School I Go?”
An engineer is considering law school. Ben and Nathan encourage him to research the opportunities that patent law offers, but suggest that staying in engineering might lead to better career outcomes.
57:21 - What’s the Deal with Detroit Mercy?
Ben and Nathan investigate Detroit Mercy Law, which just got ABA approval for a fully online JD program. The guys explore what this approval could mean for legal education. They dig into the school’s stats and highlight its Canadian–U.S. dual degree.
1:15:35 - Personal Statement Gong Show
Cody takes the stage on the Personal Statement Gong Show, chasing Sophia’s record of 34 lines.
1:33:39 - Word of the Week - Augur
“The obligation to exercise reasonable professional skill and judgment—under either constitution—does not encompass an obligation to augur an about-face by the United States Supreme Court.”
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
Ben and Nathan dig into a law professor’s claim that law school tuition is collapsing and explain what that really means for future students. More than 80% of students receive institutional scholarships. A strong LSAT score and GPA set you up to take advantage of the broken system rather than fall victim to it.
0:31 - The Law School Tuition “Collapse”
Ben and Nathan discuss a blog post by Professor Paul Campos on declining law school tuition. From 2010 to 2023, average tuition dropped by $9,000 (adjusted for inflation). The guys remind listeners that only one in five students actually pays full price, and those who do are often the least financially equipped. Improving your LSAT score and GPA is the surest way to secure a scholarship and avoid paying for law school.
19:27 - Tips from Departing Demons
Ben and Nathan share advice from departing Demon students who crushed the August LSAT.
Olivia: Never give up.
Keisha: Treat your official test like your practice tests.
Sophie: Don’t rush! Slow down, and the improvement will come.
Andrea: Avoid law school debt by following the Demon way.
33:22 - Are Optional Essays Really Optional?
Susan wonders if she should submit optional essays with her applications. Ben and Nathan say: only if you have something good to add. LSAT and GPA remain the biggest factors in law school applications. For the top T14 schools, optional essays may be more useful to include. Ben also reminds Susan that her personal statement should show, not tell.
41:04 - How to Structure Studying
Katherine asks how to structure her study time for maximum improvement. Ben and Nathan advise her to focus on one question at a time, prioritizing accuracy, and to mix drilling with timed sections.
50:55 - Career Aspirations
A listener wonders if stating a desire to become a prosecutor could hurt their application. Ben and Nathan explain that vague career goals aren’t persuasive, but if you have concrete experience, a short mention is fine.
56:25 - Time for the Early Decision Talk
Ovadia is considering an early-decision application to a T14 school. Nathan is skeptical of her chances and warns that scholarships through early decisions are rarely full rides. They recommend applying broadly to maximize her scholarship potential and improving her LSAT if she’s serious about T14.
1:10:08 - Personal Statement Gong Show
Amanda, a past contestant, writes in to thank Ben and Nathan for their feedback. Then Britt steps up as the next Gong Show contestant. In this segment, Ben and Nathan read your personal statement until they reach an unforgivable mistake—then they ring the gong. The record to beat is 34 lines, set by listener Sophia.
1:23:07 - Word of the Week
The article presented the salient facts of the dispute clearly and concisely.
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
Ben and Nate review a letter from the ABA council chair outlining the standards behind ongoing accreditation revisions. Line by line, the guys conclude the same thing: the ABA underperforms in its efforts to protect law students, from the lack of transparency surrounding the actual price of law school to the ever-increasing cost of a legal degree. Protect yourself by crushing the LSAT, applying early and broadly, and attending the right school at the right price.
Watch Episode 524 on YouTube
0:31 – Tips from Departing Demons
Ben and Nate share the top tips from departing Demon students who crushed the August exam.
Andrew: Just read the damn words.
Mario: Don’t take an official test until your scores show you’re ready.
Stevan: Get greedy.
Megan: The advice to “slow down” applies to you.
Sam: It takes hard work.
7:59 – ABA Standards and Values
The ABA council chair’s recent letter highlights their guiding standards for revised accreditation. They claim to act in the name of consumer protection and professional integrity, but many of their standards read like lip service. Ben and Nathan point out how the ABA underperforms by its own values—especially around transparency. Simply put, the law school pricing system is stacked against students. This makes it vital to focus on the actual price paid rather than the sticker price. The best way to protect yourself: crush the LSAT and attend the right school at the right price.
36:26 – Is Going to an ABA School Necessary?
Gabriel is weighing a top-tier ABA school against a state-accredited option. While elite schools are useful for breaking into big law, the bigger question is whether you understand the path to practice. Price should still be your top concern. $75,000 isn’t cheap, but with the right LSAT performance, you can likely find a school for free.
44:35 – Practice Tests
Mehdi asks whether practice tests are still relevant after the latest changes to the LSAT. Ben and Nate suggest avoiding Reddit. The LSAT has always been a test of reading and comprehension. The removal of logic games doesn’t change that. Mehdi mentions planning for the November test. Ben and Nathan push back, insisting that choosing a test date in advance is premature.
53:32 – A JD Isn’t a Gravy Train
John shares a story about meeting a law grad now working at a building supply store. It’s a reminder that a JD alone doesn’t guarantee financial stability or prestige. Listeners should carefully weigh the cost of law school against realistic career outcomes.
56:00 – What’s the Deal with Mitchell Hamline School of Law?
Ben and Nate dive into John’s story by looking at the supply clerk’s alma mater: Mitchell Hamline School of Law, “Minnesota’s Law School of Choice.”
Check out all of our What’s the Deal with segments.
1:17:09 – Word of the Week: Lacunae
“A common law prosecution is not possible, therefore, unless there is a true gap in the statutory system, and today there are few lacunae.”
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
Ben and Nathan host a special marathon edition of the Personal Statement Gong Show. They kick things off by laying out the fundamentals of personal statements—what they are, what to write about, and when to start. Then, nine students face the gong, each vying to set a record and earn their place in Thinking LSAT Gong Show history.
Watch Episode 523 on YouTube
3:33 – Personal Statement, Not Resume Recap
Ben and Nathan introduce the starting point for a personal statement: bringing one bullet point on your resume to life. Your personal statement should show, not tell, how a particular experience from your resume is going to make you a successful law student and lawyer. One of the biggest mistakes you can make is trying to cover too many positions or experiences. The personal statement is a chance to illustrate your character, not an unnecessary resume recap.
9:41 – When to Start Writing
Isaac finds himself with several hours of free time every day, even after his LSAT studying. The guys give him the green light to start working on his personal statement, but the LSAT still has to come first. They also suggest spending time on professional development through networking and research to make informed decisions about his legal career.
17:46 – Personal Statement on Running
Just because you don’t have legal experience on your resume doesn’t mean you don’t have a valuable story to share. Riley asks about writing a personal statement about marathon running. While Ben and Nathan don’t dismiss the idea outright, they explain why it might not be the best option. Customer service, familiarity with regulation and compliance, and tenacity are among the lawyery attributes that Sean could highlight from his experience in retail and landscaping.
22:37 – Personal Statement Gong Show Marathon
In a special edition of the Personal Statement Gong Show, Ben and Nathan bring nine contestants who are looking to break Sophia’s record of 34 lines. The rules are simple: Ben and Nathan read until they find an unforgivable mistake—then ring the gong.
Check out all of our Gong Show Segments!
When you substitute understanding with gimmicks, you hamper your score now and in the long term. Tips like “10 questions in 10 minutes” or “If you don’t understand an answer, it’s probably correct” excuse poor reading and rushed test-taking. When you accept that the LSAT is easy and every question is solvable, you’re more likely to commit to a problem until you solve it. No shortcuts needed.
Watch Episode 522 on YouTube
0:40 – Structuring Study
Mila started with a 150 and plans to study two to three hours a day while in school. Ben and Nathan suggest limiting LSAT time to one focused hour and prioritizing perfect grades. After she’s secured perfect grades for the semester, she can switch to LSAT prep. Mila and other candidates looking to boost their GPA could also consider enrolling in a few community college courses that offer A+ grades.
5:21 – Undergrad Involvement in Pre-Law Clubs
Kyle wonders whether joining pre-law clubs is necessary. The guys explain that clubs and extracurriculars are negligible compared to GPA and LSAT. A 4.0 GPA paired with a great LSAT score will always outweigh résumé fluff. Schools may pretend otherwise, but admissions officers prioritize numbers.
15:17 – Graduate School Conundrum
Carson asks if finishing grad school before law school makes sense. Ben and Nathan point out that lawyers learn what they need on the job—grad degrees won’t add value. Universities push unnecessary certificates and programs because they profit from them. Don’t pair bad LSAT prep with wasted tuition. Learn freely, but don’t pay for credentials you don’t need.
26:53 – Pearls vs. Turds
Demon team member Beatriz shares a questionable piece of advice that one of her students heard from another prep company: “If you don’t understand what the answer is saying, it’s probably correct.” Turd. This advice is antithetical to the Demon approach. Wrong answers don’t need to make sense, but right answers do. If you understand the passage, you should be able to understand why the right answer is right. The LSAT is easy if you approach it correctly.
32:57 – UC Law San Francisco Welcome Email
Nate reads a verbose welcome email from his alma mater, UC Law San Francisco (formerly Hastings). It’s a wall of text showing what students pay thousands for—law school administrators framing business interests as justice. The email is more about promoting the school’s image than welcoming students.
39:50 – Choosing the Right Law School
Sean wants advice on picking the right school. Step one: get your best LSAT. Step two: apply broadly and early. Step three: compare offers. Rule of thumb: rank schools by cost, not prestige. If a more expensive school is ranked higher, double its rank and see whether cheaper options fall within that range. Going cheaper often means graduating at the top of your class, with better job prospects and stronger networks.
59:57 – Question Types
McKenna asks whether she should study question types. The guys explain that focusing on question types is a distraction. Meaning is in the words on the page, not labels. Most struggling students overemphasize question types instead of careful reading.
1:07:53 – Personal Statement Gong Show
Celebrity contestant and Demon teacher Kaley shares a lived-experience essay.
1:19:05 - Word of the Week - Inexorable
Among them was a rigid belief in the inexorable power of logic to change the opinions of others.
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
Ben and Nate break down the measurable cost of applying late in the law school admissions cycle. Your LSAT score has the most value on the day that applications open. By rushing your LSAT or applying late in the cycle, you sacrifice points and leave money on the table. With AI poised to disrupt the legal market, it’s more important than ever to go to law school for free.
Watch Episode 521 on YouTube
0:32 – AI Making Law School Obsolete?
Ben and Nate discuss an article from a former Google exec claiming AI will make law and medical degrees obsolete. The guys acknowledge that AI is improving, but it still makes mistakes. While they agree that a law degree isn’t a guaranteed gravy train, they also note that the law itself is a barrier to modernization, which will slow AI’s impact on legal education. The schools most at risk are bottom feeders churning out lawyers for grunt work. Their advice: don’t pay tuition at weak schools.
14:50 – LSAT Suspended in Mainland China
LSAC halts testing in China after evidence of cheating. A Reddit post earlier this year even advertised cheating services. While tough for honest test takers in China, applicants should appreciate LSAC’s effort to safeguard exam security.
24:03 – Cost of Delaying Apps
How late is too late? While early applications are stronger, it’s never worth rushing the LSAT. The best strategy is to get your best LSAT and then apply at the start of the next cycle. A University of Chicago Journal of Law and Economics article finds that delays weaken applications. Waiting 100 days is equivalent to dropping 2.1 LSAT points or 0.26 GPA points. Schools review applications in waves, and the earliest applicants are often the strongest. Missing the first wave, even by a day, can carry measurable costs.
Dynamic Decision-Making under Rolling Admissions: Evidence from US Law School Applications
47:43 – Main Point vs. Summary
A summary lists information, but a main point answers “why.” It’s what the author is trying to convince you of, not just what they said.
52:31 – Doing LR Backwards
Listener Blair wants to work backward in Logical Reasoning to combat fatigue. Ben and Nathan’s answer: If you’re scoring under 175, you shouldn’t be finishing sections anyway, so working backward means skipping easier questions to do harder ones. If you’re at 175 or above, then fatigue isn’t an issue.
59:28 – Score Plateaus
Listeners Trevor and Ireland feel stuck. The guys caution against chasing a single breakthrough. Progress comes from carefully reviewing and learning from every mistake, one question at a time.
1:04:42 – Personal Statement Gong Show
Listener Elena is the next Gong Show contestant. Ben and Nathan read her personal statement until they reach an unforgivable mistake—they then ring the gong. The record is 34 lines, set by listener Sophia.
Want in? Send in your statement by September 1, 2025, to be considered for the Gong Super Show.
1:07:20 - Word of the Week - Truism
The standard advice about writing is mostly truisms, like “Make a plan,” “Don’t use the passive,” or “Think of your audience.”
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
Ben and Nathan share strategies for using visualization to stay engaged in Reading Comprehension. They also explain that getting a full-ride to law school takes more than just a high LSAT score—your application timing, school choices, and willingness to walk away from weak offers all matter.
Watch Episode 520 on YouTube
0:28 – How Law Schools Guide Career Decisions
A Harvard alumnus describes losing his job in big law after publishing an op-ed criticizing the Trump administration. Nathan and Ben discuss how law schools recruit students under the banner of justice, but then steer them toward corporate law firms. The guys remind listeners: you can’t do public-interest work and make big-law money at the same time. Sending their students to big law is a choice that schools have a vested interest in.
9:27 – UC Law SF Sweatshirt Drive
Nathan shares an email from UC Law San Francisco (formerly Hastings) asking alums to buy sweatshirts for incoming 1Ls. He and Ben laugh at the school’s request for $40 sweatshirts while simultaneously charging students more than $50,000 in tuition per year.
21:16 – Visualizing Passages
Connor asks for advice on improving visualization skills in RC. Strong reading comprehension depends on pausing to visualize the text—especially when it’s abstract. Creating a mind map lets you evaluate each sentence and anticipate what’s coming next. If you’re not actively questioning and connecting ideas, you’re missing the forest for the trees.
34:01 – Proctor Troubles
Michael ran into issues with a proctor during his test and wonders if he should cancel his score. Ben and Nathan say there’s no advantage to canceling. The real question is whether his practice test results showed he was ready. Prepared students need not worry about minor test-day issues.
37:51 – Don’t Settle for Sub-Par
Mike has a 3.98 GPA and practice LSAT scores in the 170s. He’s considering applying in-state with a 166 but also wonders about his T-14 prospects. The guys advise Mike to take an additional gap year, score 170+, apply early, and secure scholarships at top schools, especially given his career aspirations.
44:17 – Conditional Full Ride
Theo adopted the motto of going to law school for free. After a gap year, he improved his LSAT, applied broadly, and accepted a full-ride scholarship to his top choice law school. The downside is that it’s a conditional scholarship. Nate encourages Theo to stick to his commitment not to pay for law school.
52:37 – Personal Statement Gong Show
Natalie is the next Gong Show contestant. In this segment, Ben and Nathan read your personal statement until they reach an unforgivable mistake—they then ring the gong. The record to beat is 34 lines, set by listener Sophia.
1:08:34 - Word of the Week - Waylay
I don’t want to waylay our meeting with this topic.
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
Ben and Nathan field a handful of questions with a common theme: they come from students who are moving too fast on the LSAT, attempting too many questions, and failing to understand what they’re reading. In other words, they’re rushing to failure.
The solution is simple: Attempt one question at a time. If you miss it, review until you understand why. Then, move on to the next one. Slow down, skip all the gimmicks, and the LSAT becomes easy.
Watch Episode 519 on YouTube
0:33 – Reading All Answer Choices
Sydney asks if she can skip answer choices once she finds her prediction. Skimming bad answer choices is fine, but you still need to glance at all of them. You also don’t have to read every word. As soon as an answer starts moving in the wrong direction, eliminate it confidently and move on.
8:35 – Master’s Degree to Make Up for a Low GPA?
Joe recognizes that his undergraduate GPA will hurt his admissions chances and is considering a master’s degree to improve his odds. Ben and Nathan note that his 4.0 GPA in his senior year already shows he can succeed in law school. Graduate grades won’t factor into his LSAC GPA. Joe should focus instead on removing bad grades from his transcript and getting the best LSAT possible.
13:37 – Mean LSAT Tweets
After a 144 diagnostic, Chris sends Nate an angry email. Ben and Nathan outline the Demon’s resources for improvement—if Chris wants to use them. They also note that academically strong students often approach the LSAT like school: skimming, rushing, and relying on outside knowledge—habits that hurt scores.
19:12 – Worst GPA You’ve Ever Seen
Rachel has a 1.73 GPA and just wants to get into law school. The guys commend her paralegal experience but explain that her only shot is with a strong LSAT. Given her situation, she should consider part-time or state-accredited programs to reduce cost and risk.
26:41 – Two-Word Accommodation Request
A Reddit student gets 50% extra time for “severe anxiety” with a simple two-word doctor’s note. Ben and Nathan highlight the ease of securing accommodations but remind listeners that they aren’t necessary to succeed.
34:30 – When to Take a Break
Blake feels burnt out after hours of daily studying with little progress. The guys point out that he’s prioritizing quantity over quality. They advise him to skip September, focus on learning, and wait to take the official test when he’s ready.
43:17 – ABA Journal
Ben and Nathan scoff at the latest ABA Journal, which addresses loneliness, gambling addiction, and the California bar exam mishap just on the cover. Inside? A first-page ad asking lawyers to donate more money to the ABA with a testimonial from a dental hygienist.
50:10 – What’s the Deal with Purdue Global Law School?
Peter wants to know if Purdue Global Law School, a California-accredited law school, is worth applying to.
1:09:40 - Personal Statement Gong Show
Sophia signs up as the next Gong Show contestant. In this segment, Ben and Nathan read your personal statement until they reach an unforgivable mistake, then they ring the gong. The number of lines to beat is 21—the record currently held by listener Danielle.
1:20:27 - Word of the Week - Ameliorate
The new tutoring program was designed to ameliorate students’ struggles with reading comprehension.
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.