Looking ahead to 2026, Nick "GrimmGreen" Green and Professor Tikki Pang share their hopes and predictions for tobacco harm reduction worldwide. From clear, science-based messaging about vaping and nicotine pouches to the dangers of prohibition and illicit products, they discuss what changes are needed - and what might realistically happen. Discover their insights on creating safer alternatives and amplifying the voice of harm reduction in public health.

In 2025, the world saw both progress and setbacks in tobacco control. Sweden became officially smoke-free through effective risk-reduction policies, while Mexico implemented strict bans on vaping and harm-reduction tools, fueling black markets and uncertainty. Meanwhile, countries like Chile are leading the way with regulations that recognize safer alternatives.

In this video, experts Carmen Escrig and Ian Fearon discuss the global shift in tobacco harm reduction and the fight against prohibitionist policies. From Spain to the UK, brave policymakers are challenging outdated laws and advocating for science-based regulations that save lives. As we look toward 2026, there is hope for a world where adult smokers have safer alternatives and governments prioritize public health over ideology and lobbying. Discover the challenges, victories, and the growing momentum for change in tobacco regulation worldwide.

A powerful closing address from David Sweanor, a pioneering public health lawyer, delivered at the 12th Global Forum on Nicotine (GFN). In this concluding keynote, he reflects on the diverse perspectives within the tobacco harm reduction community, the challenges posed by opposition to new technologies, and the global momentum toward reduced-risk nicotine products. David highlights historical patterns of resistance to innovation, the importance of genuine public health principles, and the accelerating shift away from combustible cigarettes worldwide. An inspiring call to action for advocates, researchers, consumers, and industry leaders working toward a smoke-free future.

Global Forum on Nicotine 2025 Closing remarks by David Sweanor by GFN.TV

As policymakers look ahead to 2026, experts from Ireland and the United States share one clear hope for tobacco harm reduction: protect vape flavors. In this discussion, Dr. Garrett McGovern and AG Tom Miller explains why flavors are critical to keeping adults away from smoking - and why banning them could backfire, leading to higher cigarette use, including among youth. He argues that enforcing age restrictions, not eliminating flavors, is the real solution. U.S. perspectives echo this view, calling for regulatory clarity, approval of reduced-risk alternatives, and public health efforts that move smokers away from combustible tobacco.

As 2026 approaches, policymakers face a critical choice: continue repeating failed tobacco strategies or finally listen to science, consumers, and real-world evidence. In this discussion, Fiona Patten and Fernando Bueno examine why Australia’s tobacco tax revenue has collapsed, how harm reduction products like vaping are being wrongly regulated, and what countries like Sweden and New Zealand have done differently to dramatically cut smoking rates. The message is clear: less ideology, more evidence and a smarter, risk-based approach to public health.

Discover how oral nicotine pouches could represent the next frontier in tobacco harm reduction, with a deep dive into their chemistry, toxicology, and real-world use data compared with cigarettes and traditional snus. In this Science Lab session, Chris presents new evidence on toxicant reduction, biomarkers of exposure and potential harm, pharmacokinetics, and user behavior across different markets, followed by an engaging Q&A on addiction, product satisfaction, and study design.

Join us for a fast-moving roundup of the most significant tobacco harm reduction developments of 2025. From FCTC COP11 controversies and global bans to new scientific insights, advocacy efforts, and major policy shifts, Will Godfrey breaks down the year’s biggest stories. Discover where progress is being made, where setbacks continue, and how real-world consumers are shaping the future of safer nicotine.

Join GFN.TV and Michael Landl from the World Vapors Alliance as they break down COP11’s impact on tobacco harm reduction. Discover how countries challenged WHO recommendations, delayed restrictive measures, and pushed for evidence-based policies. Learn what this means for EU regulations, harm reduction strategies, and the global fight for safer nicotine alternatives.

Join Joanna Junak on GFN News as she speaks with Kurt Yeo, co-founder of Vaping Saved My Life, about the key moments and conversations surrounding COP11. Kurt shares his impressions from the unofficial Good COP 2.0 meeting in Geneva and offers insights into the broader discussions on harm reduction and tobacco policy.

YouTube’s new AI enforcement wave looks less like a policy update and more like the World Health Organization’s crusade against nicotine. In this worrying GFN Interview, GrimmGreen shows how safer-nicotine content is now being flagged as “medical misinformation” under rules that echo the WHO’s narrative: nicotine equals harm—no nuance allowed. After sixteen years as one of the most trusted voices helping adult smokers escape combustible tobacco, GrimmGreen is once again fighting to keep his channel alive. Featuring: NICK GREEN “GrimmGreen” Vape Lifestyle & Advocacy, Content Creator @GrimmGreen

Next in our Science Lab sessions, Chloe Rose PhD presents on the importance of properly designed studies and trials to determine the safety and relative risk of nicotine products.

In this exclusive GFN News interview, Joanna Junak speaks with Nancy Loucas, CAPHRA Executive Coordinator, about the fallout from COP11 in Geneva and the controversial Dirty Ashtray Award given to New Zealand. Despite achieving significant reductions in smoking through regulated vaping and progressive harm reduction policies, New Zealand was criticized by the WHO FCTC Secretariat and its supporting NGOs. Nancy explains why this award reflects a shift away from evidence-based public health priorities and highlights the growing tension between harm reduction strategies and prohibitionist tobacco policies.

Misunderstanding nicotine delivery: a discussion on nicotine pouches. PMI's Carrie Wade and Gizelle Baker discuss the problems with comparing nicotine content of pouches with combustible tobacco. #GFN25 Science Lab discussions

This GFN Voices 2025 episode brings together advocates, scientists and campaigners from around the world to share why the Global Forum on Nicotine matters, how tobacco harm reduction is being misunderstood, and why honest communication, access to safer products and open debate are essential for helping people move away from smoking.

In this episode of Science Lab, we break down the latest research comparing traditional cigarette smoking with heated tobacco products (HTPs). Using evidence from multiple clinical studies, she explains how switching completely from smoking to HTPs affects biomarkers of exposure, biomarkers of potential harm, reported symptoms, and overall risk profiles.

Former Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller—America’s longest-serving AG and a principal architect of the Master Settlement Agreement—joins GFN.TV with a clear warning: the U.S. is making extraordinary progress against combustible tobacco, yet the public isn’t hearing about it. Smoking has collapsed to historic lows, youth vaping has fallen 70% since 2019, and millions of adults have shifted to far safer non-combustible nicotine products. By any honest measure, it’s one of the most significant public-health successes in decades. So why isn’t tobacco control talking about it? Featuring: TOM MILLER Former Iowa Attorney General Founder, Miller Monitoring and Consulting, LLC.

Nigeria is experiencing increasing health impacts from smoking, and experts argue that harm reduction—not prohibition—is key to saving lives. In this GFN News episode, Joanna Junak interviews Uche Olatunji and Yusuf Adebisi on the major barriers to tobacco harm reduction in Nigeria, including widespread misinformation about nicotine and a lack of educational resources. They discuss community outreach, science-based alternatives, and the critical roles of universities and the media in shifting public perception. Learn how evidence-based harm-reduction strategies can help Nigerians make safer, informed decisions.

The media play a key role in shaping debates around THR. It is essential that information they communicate is accurate and reflects science and evidence. Misinformation and the impact it can have on consumers, and public health generally, is something we should avoid. A lack of knowledge, expertise and time to verify information provided – often by NGOs that allege to be working on behalf of public health – can lead to damaging narratives that serve nobody’s interest. How can we foster positive relationships with media to represent THR accurately and challenge those who seek to undermine it?