In this episode, I reflect on Japan’s growing emphasis on tourism as a national strategy and ask what it reveals about the country’s current direction. Tourism is often presented as a hopeful engine for economic revival, yet it is typically a labor-intensive, low-productivity sector that struggles to support long-term stability. By looking at issues such as demographic decline, aging society, and limited wage growth, this episode questions whether tourism can truly address Japan’s deeper structural challenges. Rather than offering easy answers, the discussion explores why tourism has become an appealing option—and what may be overlooked when it is treated as a central solution.

In this episode, I explore why living freely has become increasingly difficult in modern society. Although we often hear that values are more diverse and people are free to choose their own paths, the reality may be the opposite. By comparing postwar Japan with the present, I argue that earlier eras were restrictive but gave real weight to personal choices. Today, countless lifestyle “templates” circulate through social media, making deviation feel easy but shallow. What appears to be freedom often means borrowing pre-made stories. True freedom, I suggest, requires refusing borrowed narratives and fully accepting one’s own position and responsibility.

In this episode, I examine the concept of “Three-Nothingism” and how it has evolved in modern Japanese society. Originally used in the 1970s to describe apathy among youth, the term has transformed into a new configuration: no ideology, no criticism, and no engagement. This is not a sign of laziness or ignorance, but a rational survival strategy in a society where taking a stance carries risk. By comparing past cultural “detachment” with today’s permanent withdrawal, this episode argues that choosing not to think, criticize, or engage has become a fully developed social and political attitude—one uniquely optimized for contemporary conditions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

●ビジネス日本語学習者のための無料メルマガ講座⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://my162p.com/p/r/odSmegng⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

●ビジネス日本語学習者向けブログ

ビジネスのために日本語を学んでいる人のための情報を発信しています⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://businessnihongo555.blogspot.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this episode, I explore how “storytelling” has shifted from a tool for communication into a mechanism for hiding desire. In contemporary society, individuals, companies, and even states are expected to justify their actions with purpose, meaning, and moral narratives. Yet beneath these stories often lie simple, unspoken desires: comfort, approval, power, or control. Rather than confronting these motives directly, polished narratives function as moral cover, deflecting responsibility and neutralizing criticism. As stories grow larger and cleaner, true intentions become harder to see. This episode questions the modern faith in storytelling and argues that refusing to wrap desire in narrative may be a more honest stance.

In this episode, I examine why so-called “establishment-friendly experts” — government advisors, media commentators, consultants, and influencers — tend to survive, succeed, and accumulate wealth in the 21st century. Rather than attacking individuals, this talk analyzes the structural reasons behind their stability. These figures rarely lie outright; instead, they selectively frame problems in ways that protect organizations, sponsors, and existing power structures. This approach minimizes risk, avoids enemies, and leads to long-term financial rewards. By contrast, those who question structures and assign responsibility often remain economically disadvantaged. This episode explores that trade-off and asks listeners to consciously choose where they stand — not morally, but structurally.

In this episode, I reflect on how repeated exposure to AI-generated animal videos may quietly reshape our sense of ethics. These videos are cute, harmless, and comforting—but they depict beings that cannot be hurt, exhausted, or disappointed. As we grow accustomed to relationships without risk, pain, or responsibility, our emotional responses begin to detach from real, living others. This is not a critique of technology itself, nor of people seeking comfort, but an examination of what happens when ethical awareness loses its reference point. I explore how convenience and emotional safety may slowly erode our capacity to engage with real human vulnerability.

This episode examines Japanese TV programs that introduce local companies and factories, especially those aired during the New Year holidays. While these shows present clean workplaces, smiling employees, and strong “teamwork,” they leave out crucial information. What happens if you don’t join company events? Does refusing after-work drinking affect your evaluation? These questions are never asked. Japanese viewers often read between the lines, but outsiders cannot. The programs portray harmony as universal, erasing those who didn’t fit and quietly left. This is not a criticism of companies or television, but an analysis of what remains unsaid—and how corporate culture selects who stays visible and who disappears.

In Japan, year-end and New Year television used to be loud, emotional, and full of forced meaning. Viewers were told to reflect, feel inspired, and set new goals. Today, that atmosphere has quietly disappeared. Modern holiday TV is calm, repetitive, and avoids demanding anything from the audience. This episode explores why this shift happened. It argues that television has not declined, but that society itself has become exhausted by meaning, reflection, and life lessons. Interestingly, while TV withdraws from meaning, podcasts and audiobooks have become places where people willingly engage with heavier thoughts—alone, through their headphones.

In this year-end episode, I reflect on a simple but often overlooked truth: real connection is not created by language alone. You can study a foreign language for years and still feel no bond with certain people, while sometimes sharing deep understanding with someone despite limited words. Communication goes beyond vocabulary and grammar—it rests on values, worldview, and shared emotional rhythm. I also explore how “being natural” or “speaking honestly” is often an act, especially in politics and public life. True understanding comes from sensing what lies beneath words. Thank you for listening this year, and I wish you a thoughtful and peaceful new year.

This episode explores what “confidence” really means in an age obsessed with self-esteem and certainty. Rather than treating confidence as strength, loudness, or unwavering belief, this talk reframes it as the willingness to act while fully accepting the possibility of being wrong. Drawing on everyday examples from work, politics, and self-help culture, the episode critiques performative confidence and exposes how apparent certainty often masks deep anxiety. True confidence, it argues, is quiet, flexible, and capable of revision. In an uncertain world, the ability to hold responsibility without clinging to absolute correctness becomes the most realistic and humane form of confidence.

In this episode, Shigeki analyzes why “lightness” becomes the optimal survival strategy inside Japanese corporations. This is not a personal attack or a moral critique, but a structural explanation. In organizations where decisions change frequently, responsibility is blurred, and evaluation criteria are unclear, taking everything seriously can lead to exhaustion. Those who survive tend to detach emotions from words, tolerate contradictions, and switch positions quickly. What appears as superficiality is actually a functional adaptation. This episode explains why sincere, logically consistent people often burn out—and why incompatibility with such systems is not a personal failure, but a mismatch of environments.

In this episode, I analyze the rise and decline of “meaning-free” YouTubers and explain why that era is coming to an end. Early YouTube thrived on vlogs that avoided opinions, responsibility, and ideology, offering viewers a sense of freedom from overproduced media. However, once this style became a template, it lost its power. As living costs, global instability, and social anxiety increased, viewers began to see “natural” and “carefree” creators as irresponsible rather than comforting. Today, audiences seek clarity, position, and accountability. The creators who survive will be those willing to take responsibility for meaning—and accept being disliked.

In this episode, I explore a mindset often praised in modern society: the belief that “not thinking deeply, yet still winning” is a virtue. We examine how ideas like being “natural,” “easygoing,” or “not overthinking” are used to justify success without reflection. This mindset works well when supported by youth, energy, luck, or favorable circumstances—but it becomes fragile over time. As those advantages fade, the absence of accumulated thought reveals its cost. This episode is not an attack on individuals, but a structural critique of how anti-intellectual values are quietly rewarded, and why, in the long run, only sustained thinking remains a reliable asset.

In this episode, Shigeki explores the hidden dangers of overvaluing “trust” and “credibility” in business and society. While trust is often praised as the foundation of success, he argues that it does not create culture, discovery, or innovation. Trust functions mainly as a system that prevents mistakes and discourages deviation from the norm. Through historical examples such as Christopher Columbus, the episode shows that breakthroughs come first—and trust is assigned afterward. When societies prioritize safety, past performance, and risk avoidance, creativity fades. This talk challenges the belief that accumulating trust leads to progress, and asks what is lost when we play it too safe.

In this episode, I examine the hidden dangers that emerge when life-advice content becomes intertwined with neoliberal self-responsibility thinking. While life coaching and self-help often appear kind and supportive, they can quietly shift blame onto individuals who are already vulnerable. When failure is explained only as a lack of effort or mindset, thinking stops and responsibility is simplified. This structure is especially profitable as content, yet deeply harmful as guidance. I contrast today’s advice industry with earlier forms of life counseling that were constrained by distance, credibility, and non-commercial motives. Not all advice heals—some advice binds.

In this episode, I examine how the word “salaryman” has quietly reshaped individual identity in Japanese society. Unlike professions defined by skills or expertise, “salaryman” describes people only by how they are paid, not by what they do. This linguistic habit ties identity to companies rather than personal abilities, making it difficult to describe oneself outside organizational affiliation. I explore how this structure developed, why it feels normal in Japan, and how it can hollow out individual identity over time. This is not a critique of workers, but an analysis of language, structure, and the quiet costs they create.

In this episode, I explore a simple but uncomfortable truth: modern humans still live with primitive brains. While technology, AI, social media, and financial systems have evolved at breathtaking speed, our neural structure remains largely unchanged from that of early humans. Likes on social media trigger the same reward systems as tribal approval around a campfire. Fear, anger, and anxiety arise faster than reason. By examining brain structure, dopamine, and social behavior, this episode explains why modern life feels overwhelming—and why we so easily fall back into instinctive reactions. Understanding this gap between civilization and biology may be the first step toward regaining control.

In this episode, I examine the hidden structure of bullying embedded in Japanese comedy culture. Many forms of “humor” rely on humiliation, pain, and rigid hierarchies, where mocking others is normalized as entertainment. I argue that this structure mirrors power dynamics seen in schools, workplaces, and cases of workplace harassment. By disguising aggression as jokes, responsibility is avoided and symbolic violence becomes invisible. This is not a problem of individual character, but of social design. Through this analysis, I invite listeners to rethink laughter, power, and the cultural systems that quietly legitimize harm in everyday life.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

●ビジネス日本語学習者のための無料メルマガ講座⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://my162p.com/p/r/odSmegng⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

●ビジネス日本語学習者向けブログ

ビジネスのために日本語を学んでいる人のための情報を発信しています⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://businessnihongo555.blogspot.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this episode, I take a critical look at the phrase “Don’t look for the blue bird,” a piece of advice often repeated by successful people in business and career discussions. While it sounds wise and comforting, this idea is usually spoken after success has already been achieved. I examine how this message functions less as life wisdom and more as a convenient ethic for corporate organizations, encouraging obedience and discouraging exploration. Searching, changing paths, and questioning one’s environment are not weaknesses. For many people, especially early in their careers, exploration is a necessary and legitimate part of growth.

In today’s business world, speaking itself has become a form of value. On social media and in side-hustle culture, polished language often matters more than real results, experience, or substance. This episode explores how empty theories and fashionable buzzwords have replaced genuine value, while those who actually create, build, and understand rarely speak up. Looking back at Japan’s postwar manufacturing culture and comparing it with today’s storytelling economy, this talk examines the growing gap between content and commentary. It argues that the future belongs not to those who talk the most, but to those who can unite real substance with honest language.